London Fire Brigade Evidence - Wednesday 29th September 2021 (1/2)

29 September 2021 · Mr Millett QC (Counsel to the Inquiry), Gary Reason (former Director of Operational Resilience and Training, LFB) · 3:11:31
▶ Watch on YouTube Open in interactive viewer

Evidence from Gary Reason (former LFB Director of Operational Resilience and Training) regarding radio communications failures, BA equipment issues, response to Lakanal coroner's recommendations, and training rollout delays.

Key moments

Full transcript

00:21:06 good morning everyone welcome to today's hearing today we're going to continue hearing evidence from mr gary reason so would you ask mr reason to come back in please

00:21:22 good morning mr reason that's it make yourself comfortable thank you

00:21:42 thank you please carry on yes mr miller mr chairman thank you good morning to you good morning members of the panel good morning to you mr reason good morning last night when we finished uh for the day we were uh discussing the

00:21:54 for the day we were uh discussing the question of the transmission strength of ba radios uh at latino house can we move on on from that uh or through that um to the next document which is the

00:22:05 the next document which is the statements from the former commissioner mr ron dobson and i want to look with you please at his third witness statement at lfb lfb00810652

00:22:18 there's the first page of it it's dated the 30th of april 2020. can we go please to page 3 and look at paragraph 11 for to the page there and there you see that he explains that

00:22:29 and there you see that he explains that a team

00:22:30 a team led by dac tim cut bill um investigated the communications difficulties at lacanal

00:22:36 lacanal and that there was a report prepared which he said addressed uh as you can see at the bottom of the page the impact of steel framed buildings on

00:22:47 on interference with radio signals you see that yes i say that and uh he says that i'm summarizing his evidence ultimately fed into the lfb's latino operational review report now what he does is that he exhibits at

00:22:59 now what he does is that he exhibits at rjd14

00:23:01 rjd14 uh an email that he refers to let's look at that it's lfb double zero one one zero six five seven

00:23:13 uh and it's uh from group manager zimancik i think that's how you pronounce it peter zemansic that's correct thank you of the 13th of april 2010

00:23:23 2010 to roger tuckly and

00:23:26 and it shows uh that that report has been commissioned now just to be to be clear group manager symantec was um health and safety services i think that's correct and therefore within your directorate um

00:23:38 and therefore within your directorate um in 2010 i was the assistant commissioner operational resilient so um i was not in the director post but within the within the directorate to

00:23:49 but within the within the directorate to which you ascended yes yes uh and um if we look at the second paragraph on this page after the introduction he says this as part of the inquiry into the lack of

00:24:00 as part of the inquiry into the lack of house fatal fire a number of statements made by firefighters suggests their radios failed however having tracked all these statements back i've identified that in reality only one battery set failed and was subsequently repaired

00:24:12 failed and was subsequently repaired would you be able to provide me with a report stroke explanation of why steel framed buildings interfere with radio signals

00:24:20 signals and there's a response to this question from roger tuckley at lfb double zero one one zero six five nine

00:24:30 nine let's look at that um it's a little document called in-building radio user difficulties uh it's a one-page document and uh the second paragraph on that page below

00:24:42 the second paragraph on that page below the bullet points reads as follows and i'll show it to you before i do can i ask you have you ever seen this document before no i haven't no um when propagating into buildings

00:24:53 no um when propagating into buildings radio signals pass through various materials before reaching a receiver's antenna

00:24:57 antenna the interaction of radio signals with building materials usually results in lower signal strength different construction materials have different attenuation characteristics some construction materials very rapidly

00:25:09 construction materials very rapidly attenuate signal strength buildings which have a significant thickness of concrete or amount of metal used in its production will attenuate the signal concrete floors are often poured onto a metal pan which completely blocks most

00:25:21 metal pan which completely blocks most radio signals some solid foam insulation and some fiberglass insulation used in exterior walls have foil backing which will reduce signals energy efficient windows and metal

00:25:33 energy efficient windows and metal window window screens are also very effective at blocking radio signals to be to be specific rf energy entering a building will be partially absorbed and partially reflected by the building materials

00:25:44 reflected by the building materials encountered now you weren't aware of this report as i think you just confirmed can you explain why you weren't aware of this report given your involvement a little bit later on the latino house board and

00:25:56 bit later on the latino house board and the latino house working group in and after 2013. well looking at the date and i assume this report would have been produced uh shortly after that email you've just shown me in 2010 i'd only just taken up

00:26:09 shown me in 2010 i'd only just taken up a position as the head of operational resilience and i didn't sit on the lacrimal house board meetings at that point i didn't sit on them for another two years no

00:26:19 no at that point who was responsible on the latin house board for examining comms if anybody

00:26:26 anybody um it would have been the head of operational procedures which was jim knighton at the time i believe and his boss was gary dobson who was my line manager as well so i took over from

00:26:37 line manager as well so i took over from gary dobson in the director position when he retired right can you explain why when you took over from that position you weren't provided with this report

00:26:45 report um i didn't know the report existed so i don't know why i wasn't provided i don't think

00:26:50 think to be fair i don't think the stuff that happened in the past and obviously i don't know what the conclusion of this uh report was um that i the the people that joined the board would have gone back you know many

00:27:02 board would have gone back you know many years looking at previous documents right that's not that's not what i did anyway right can we take it from that that when the lachmal house working group was established and you were doing

00:27:13 group was established and you were doing from april 2013 and may 2013 the collation exercise of the responses to the rule 43 recommendations nobody went back historically over the records

00:27:24 went back historically over the records to see what lack of house were the lack of house board had done by way of um examining the comms problems that lacking i'm not aware that was done but that

00:27:35 i'm not aware that was done but that doesn't mean it wasn't done i i'm not aware that it was done that exercise as you described it right now and before this report were you yourself aware of the limitations that building construction and materials

00:27:46 building construction and materials could place on the efficacy of transmission of radio signals i was certainly aware that certain buildings and distance of travel were two issues that

00:27:57 distance of travel were two issues that could potentially impact on fire ground radio as i said uh my evidence i'm a very experienced operational officer been to lots of large incidents where uh you know signal issues may have been

00:28:10 uh you know signal issues may have been present so i was certainly aware buildings and distance of travel were two issues that could impact on radio efficiency right do i take it from that answer that

00:28:21 answer that the the problems with transmission of radio signals at latin was was not a new problem

00:28:28 problem um

00:28:30 um no

00:28:31 no various incidents we would have experienced issues with radio comms at varying degrees right i mean your experience um i i can't conceivably challenge but did it lead at

00:28:43 conceivably challenge but did it lead at all during your time before you became d-o-r-d-o-r-d-o-o-r-t

00:28:48 to any kind of wholesale investigation about how things might be made better well some of the equipment that we introduced certainly during my last 10 years things like

00:29:00 last 10 years things like radio repeaters leaky feeders were all designed to overcome some of the limitations that are described in this document successfully yes they they do work uh the right i

00:29:13 yes they they do work uh the right i won't go into the technical details of radio repeaters and leaky feeders i think you've already uh aware of that but yeah they're designed to overcome the very issues that are reflected in this report

00:29:25 reflected in this report now as we've seen from the paragraph i've read you mr tuckley's report identifies the buildings with thick concrete metal foam insulation insulation with foil backing energy efficient windows etc

00:29:37 efficient windows etc might all impact or might entirely block radio signals um do you agree using our own experience that that is likely to reflect a high proportion of buildings uh attended by

00:29:50 proportion of buildings uh attended by the lfb

00:29:52 the lfb um yes that is true but that's not the same as saying that we experienced um a large frequency of radio communications issues or incidents so one of the

00:30:03 so one of the requirements of the pr o and the plc the performance review of operations and performance review of command is to look at incident communications that's one of the topics that the chair of those

00:30:14 the topics that the chair of those review meetings will consider and therefore logically issues relating to incident comms or incident communications equipment would appear in the impd reports if there was

00:30:28 appear in the impd reports if there was a high frequency of communications issues and that's certainly never featured in all the time that i was sitting at odcb comms we did put out information about communications

00:30:39 put out information about communications but there wasn't a sort of a significant trend if to use that term of communication failures or incidents that would depend on the nature of the incident wouldn't it uh it would depend

00:30:50 incident wouldn't it uh it would depend on the nature of the incident the building type that was involved in that incident and the tactical plan that was deployed for those incidents yes just let's just take it in stages because i think you've jumped

00:31:01 think you've jumped to the conclusion without going through the steps with me um first do you agree that looking at the um the physical attributes of the buildings described by mr tuckly in this

00:31:12 buildings described by mr tuckly in this paragraph

00:31:14 paragraph that reflects a high proportion of buildings attended by the lfb at around this time and thereafter yes yes uh and do you agree that a high proportion of high-rise residential

00:31:26 proportion of high-rise residential blocks in london particularly those built or retrofitted in recent years would fall would have one or more of these characteristics identified by mr tarkley yes i'd agree

00:31:37 identified by mr tarkley yes i'd agree with that yes does it follow from that that the lfb's radio signals may be not always but maybe adversely affected at a significant number of operational incidents

00:31:48 incidents um i'd agree with the first part of that statement that the they obviously could be infected by the the issues described here but i wouldn't say

00:31:59 say frequently for the reasons i set out it depends on the nature of the fire where the fire is in the building and the tactical plan that's used to deal with that incident does it follow even from that with your

00:32:10 does it follow even from that with your qualification that ins incidents at high-rise residential blocks in london would be especially prone to problems with radio transmission yes potentially yes now let's go to lfb

00:32:24 yes potentially yes now let's go to lfb triple zero four nine eight seven eight please

00:32:32 uh now this is an email uh from tim cut sorry to kim tim cut bill from david kenneth on the 24th of april 2012. and david kennett was a i think is this

00:32:44 and david kennett was a i think is this right a member of the fire safety enforcement team within the lfb yes he was yes

00:32:50 was yes and this is before the latino house inquest so long before only rule 43 recommendations um it's

00:32:58 um it's 11 months before that uh

00:33:01 uh and as we can see from the foot of the page

00:33:03 page he's responding to a request for comments on the latino operational review report and i just want to show you what he says at paragraph eight he says this communications difficulties my

00:33:14 says this communications difficulties my impression is that comms was a real issue at the incident there are no recommendations regarding this issue the comms problems are attributed to the construction stroke layout of the building bearing in mind

00:33:25 layout of the building bearing in mind that lachen is is traditional construction and not unlike many high-rise in london the report seems to conclude that there is nothing that can be done about the difficulties experienced by the crews with the implication that we expect to experience

00:33:37 implication that we expect to experience similar problems at future incidents now you were not copied into this email as we can see but the question is for you was this issue discussed by the latino house board at this time so this

00:33:49 latino house board at this time so this is april 2012 by which time i think you were on it uh yeah i i my first meeting was in the february of 2012. yes um [Music]

00:33:58 [Music] i

00:34:00 i obviously there was a lot of lack of board meetings i can't remember this particular issue being an agenda item i can't say whether we discuss it or not i just don't remember from the meeting that was nearly eight years ago so

00:34:12 that was nearly eight years ago so unless it's in the minutes of the meetings i i can't help you on that i'm afraid right

00:34:21 would you expect the issue to have been discussed at the latino board given the importance that uh david kennett has

00:34:29 has placed on it in this email i would expect the communications difficulty to appear in the

00:34:36 the incident or sorry the investigation report

00:34:40 report that was produced that responded or you know took account of what the investigation team had found so i have read i've read that at the time i haven't read it recently and i don't know if it contains a

00:34:52 and i don't know if it contains a particular section around communications i suspect it would do if if there was significant communications difficulty at the incident that would have been one of the things that the investigation team would

00:35:03 things that the investigation team would have highlighted right was it one of the 34 items action items do you remember um

00:35:13 my car i can't remember off the top of my head let's go to lfb double zero one zero six seven five five please

00:35:22 now uh the second email on this page is is the email to which i want to draw your attention uh it's from jim a court to tim cut bill uh of the 28th of february 2013 now

00:35:35 uh of the 28th of february 2013 now we're in 2013. so this is um during the latter house inquests for the purposes of the chronology and it reads as follows tim as requested i've considered issues

00:35:46 tim as requested i've considered issues surrounding radio transmissions at latino house with a view to identifying any reasons why radios may have appeared less effective than anticipated my views on this were as follows and then he sets out a lot of detail um

00:35:59 and then he sets out a lot of detail um i i'm going to read quite a bit of this to you so follow along with me um analog radios is used by the london fire brigade for communications at an incident operate in simplex mode this

00:36:10 incident operate in simplex mode this means that only one person can transmit a radio message while all people in transmission range can receive the transmission the incident ground radios work with a within line of sight of each other essentially this means that the radios

00:36:21 essentially this means that the radios operate best when the radio operators are able to see each other and where there are no obstructions between them totally unobstructed lfb incident ground radios will transmit and receive clearly over a distance of more than 500 meters

00:36:33 over a distance of more than 500 meters any obstruction between the radio transmitting and those receiving the signal will mean that the distance for effective operation will be reduced it is not possible to easily identify

00:36:44 it is not possible to easily identify the level of reduction as the physical properties of the obstruction can make a significant difference steel frame buildings are more difficult for radio signals to penetrate than simple brick-built or timber-framed buildings due to physical property of

00:36:56 buildings due to physical property of the steel

00:36:57 the steel the strength of transmission in watts makes a difference to the distance over which radio transmissions can be received the greater the transmission strength the greater the effective distance

00:37:07 distance incident ground radios issue to all operational personnel within the lfb are programmed with different signal strengths depending on the channel and its use

00:37:18 the channel and its use and he then lists the channels as bullet points one two three four five and six which we've covered already and then goes on to say this in the next bullet point due to the requirement to have intrinsically safe equipment attached to

00:37:29 intrinsically safe equipment attached to breathing apparatus sets there's a limit on the transmission strength for all ba radios used by the nfb the limit is set at a maximum of one watt across all radio channels the difference between transmission

00:37:41 the difference between transmission strength means that ba radio cannot transmit as far as incident ground radios

00:37:46 radios typically at incidents in high rise buildings

00:37:50 buildings the bridge head is positioned two floors below the floor on which the fire is located the ba entry control point with ba com's officer is usually located at the bridgehead at lachnall house

00:38:01 the bridgehead at lachnall house conditions meant that the bridgehead was actually located at ground level this meant an extended transmission distance as well as the requirement for radio signal penetration through significant obstructions

00:38:12 obstructions uh there may be other issues he says uh and that's that's the end of the email and can see that from the top of page two which we don't need to go to now you were not copied into this email but were you ever

00:38:23 copied into this email but were you ever made aware of its contents or the detailed issues set out in it uh

00:38:28 uh no it wasn't

00:38:31 given that these discussions were happening

00:38:34 happening in february 2013 and within your directorate can you explain why you weren't ever uh cited on

00:38:43 cited on or notified of the contents or the detailed issues in this email i can't

00:38:49 i can't comment on why jim mccourt didn't copy in

00:38:52 in his head of service which may have prompted a discussion with myself to be fair some of these uh limitations if you're calling them and and technical context of the radio capability that

00:39:04 context of the radio capability that london fire brigade had at the time i was aware of um but i but yeah i yeah the answer to the question is no i haven't seen it and i don't know why i wasn't showing it did no one ever raise these issues with you

00:39:16 no one ever raise these issues with you when a month later the coroner made her rule 43 recommendations relating to communications um i don't recall anyone raising these particular issues but i'm

00:39:27 raising these particular issues but i'm aware that group manager jim mccall was one of the people that drafted the response to the incident comms

00:39:39 response to the incident comms issue that was presented by the rule 43 coroner's report um so the same officer was dealing with the brigade's proposed response to that action as it's the same author as this document

00:39:51 as it's the same author as this document yes i mean putting yourself in the position of the person receiving uh that draft pro forma the collated document we saw earlier with all the yellow highlights on it in april 2013 would you

00:40:02 highlights on it in april 2013 would you have expected jamaica in fact to have drafted something which brought all these issues to your attention so that they could be addressed uh in the context of the response to the rule 43 recommendation on comms uh to be

00:40:15 rule 43 recommendation on comms uh to be fair to mr cole i think some of those issues were in the what i called the working draft of the prophet but uh not all of them might accept that right now were you aware that similar problems with comms presented themselves

00:40:27 problems with comms presented themselves at the shirley towers fire in hampshire in in april 2010. i was familiar with the fatal fire report from shirley towers yes yes let's look at that

00:40:38 towers yes yes let's look at that and that's at lfb double zero one zero seven one three zero

00:40:45 let's look at the first page and there it is the date of the fire is as you can see sixth of april twenty ten and the report is dated um the 8th of april 2010.

00:40:57 2010. if we look at page 53

00:41:01 53 please let's look together at 3.10 handheld radios finding

00:41:09 finding well let me just pause that when you you say you're familiar with it did you read it at the time i read it at the time yes did you read it in the context of your work on the latino house board or later

00:41:20 work on the latino house board or later the latino house working group um this became a separate um rule 43 report to odcb so you will be familiar with the

00:41:31 you will be familiar with the the documents we were reviewing yesterday which focused on the lacrimal house element of that but the bit before that um covers issues that arose from the shirley towers fire yes yes yes you

00:41:42 the shirley towers fire yes yes yes you did you referred to that yesterday and this is i think an example of that then now let's go to paragraph 3.10 handheld radios finding the handheld radios used by hfrs that's hampshire for iron rescue

00:41:54 by hfrs that's hampshire for iron rescue service may not always operate effectively in high-rise buildings these radios are also used by ba wearers to communicate with the baco um that's the um

00:42:05 um that's the um entry controller control officer the ba breathing apparatus engine control officer at this incident communications proved difficult necessitating the need to use other forms of communications notably mobile

00:42:16 forms of communications notably mobile phones

00:42:17 phones the problem of poor radio communication in structures such as high-rise buildings or ships is well known post-incident testing of radios by hc showed that they were operating effectively there were instances

00:42:29 effectively there were instances throughout the incident of some key personnel not having radios eg the second baiko now as i say this report is eighth of april 2013. we get that from page three

00:42:40 april 2013. we get that from page three we don't need to turn it up now this was a week

00:42:43 a week after the lachenal coroner's rule 43 recommendations um did you hear or see this report at the time or hear about it

00:42:55 this report at the time or hear about it i was certainly aware the report as soon as it came to my attention that it was been published i would have read it fairly soon after it was published i'd imagine i can't remember the exact date but it would have been around that time

00:43:06 but it would have been around that time i i would imagine so 8th of april 2013 uh

00:43:11 uh you would have read it around about that time who would have brought it to your attention do you remember um

00:43:17 um i can't remember i may have gone and found it myself someone probably would have said it had been published um there might have even been a chief fire officers association communication about it that would be typical

00:43:28 it that would be typical uh when another brigade has received uh recommendations uh coroner's recommendations that was brought to the attention of all fire and rescue services so it's probably that mechanism that alerted my attention that this document had been published right do you

00:43:39 document had been published right do you agree that as at this time so early april 2013 the problem of poor radio communications in high-rise buildings was now becoming well known as the result of two fatal high-rise fires um

00:43:50 result of two fatal high-rise fires um yeah certainly radio comms within high-rise structures was was known potentially to be an issue at certain incidents yes yes known to the lfb yes yes

00:44:03 and can you tell us what your directorate was doing to combat those difficulties at that time well the this report would have been reviewed to develop an action plan uh

00:44:14 develop an action plan uh in response to the rule 43 and that would have been done uh the communications element of this report would have been done by the head of operational assurance which was jim knighton at the time

00:44:25 jim knighton at the time uh i think he was still at that point he was still the head of operational uh operational policy sorry sorry so just be clear

00:44:33 be clear you say the communications element of this report would have been done well look reviewed should i say that's probably a better word he would have been sent a copy of this to uh look at

00:44:44 to uh look at issues from an nfb's perspective to see if there was anything that we were going to respond to from a lfb position obviously we're not responding to the hampshire coroner but we're responding internally yes

00:44:56 internally yes so how would that tie in with the response to the rule 43 recommendations that you had received about ten days beforehand um i can't say for sure because i wasn't

00:45:08 i can't say for sure because i wasn't the officer doing the work but uh as i said group manager jim mccull would have been

00:45:13 been the person who's leading the incident communications team and i suspect that this report uh ended up on his desk in in relation to this particular issue because he was our head of incident communications uh right now

00:45:26 of incident communications uh right now and we've got effectively two rule 43s two incidents lachlan house and shirley shirley towers

00:45:37 and shirley shirley towers was the shirley towers sorry was the lfb's response to the shirley towers incident

00:45:44 incident and the problems identified on this page that i'm showing you in the report something that was dealt with by the lfb separately from the response to the lack of rule 43 recommendations or to your knowledge did

00:45:56 recommendations or to your knowledge did jim acort tie them together to produce a single composite and consistent response to the problem i don't honestly know the answer to that

00:46:08 i don't honestly know the answer to that but looking at the evidence that i'm aware of and what you showed me yesterday about the lack of house rule 43

00:46:15 43 from memory i don't think there's a specific

00:46:18 specific rule 43

00:46:20 rule 43 action lfb action in response to the shirley towers incident communications issue so i can assume that he did merge the two because they're obviously dealing with the same type of issue right i mean

00:46:32 with the same type of issue right i mean you make that assumption based on the fact that the the same issue but um what does that tell us about the structure of the lfb in in dealing

00:46:43 in dealing responsively with the problem whether the problem comes from hampshire or whether it comes from southwark um

00:46:50 um well i'm assured that the fact that the the information was being dealt with by the right team and that was the intercommunications team um

00:46:59 um so in terms of your question what does it tell us about the structure yes let me maybe be clearer perhaps yeah you assume that it was all being dealt with both

00:47:08 both reports as it were were on jim acor's desk

00:47:11 desk um

00:47:12 um what leads you to assume that he would have dealt with them as a as a single consistent item both addressing the problems raised by by the shirley towers incident and perhaps more specifically by lachlan so

00:47:24 perhaps more specifically by lachlan so looking at the working pro forma as i call it that went to the commissioner's board on the lagrangle house rule 43 which obviously contained quite a bit background information about internet

00:47:35 information about internet communications and reading that and then looking at these issues they're virtually the same issue so

00:47:42 issue so um

00:47:44 i would i would assume i use that word again that the outcome from a service provision point of view and is that if if we address the lacrimal house rule 43

00:47:56 address the lacrimal house rule 43 we'll also go in pretty much all the way and we'll address the issues identified in this report right specifically focusing on this paragraph you'll see that the author

00:48:08 you'll see that the author says that at this incident there was a need to use other forms of communications notably mobile telephones now was there any discussion that you knew about within the in the

00:48:19 that you knew about within the in the context of of the response to the lachenal rule 43 recommendations particularly where she had said please look at personal communications

00:48:30 look at personal communications um

00:48:31 um about about whether or not it would be possible to make greater use on the fire ground of mobile telephones i can't answer that because i didn't do the review work

00:48:42 the review work as you probably know all senior officers were issued with lfb mobile phones so we certainly had the capability to use mobile phones

00:48:54 use mobile phones but all senior officers station manager and above same constituency of officer also had airwave radio so we we already had a if in effect a tertiary opportunity to use airwave

00:49:07 tertiary opportunity to use airwave digital radio as a communications options at incidents if we needed to so we wouldn't need to rely on mobile phones because we've already got a digital device that all senior officers

00:49:18 digital device that all senior officers have available to them available to them maybe

00:49:22 maybe can i just ask it this way you

00:49:26 you receive

00:49:27 receive the

00:49:28 the draft rule 43 pro forma i call it that it's the document of the yellow highlighting on we saw on the 11th of may 2013 and you have a meeting with the other members of the commissioners group on

00:49:40 commissioners group on the 14th yep you established that at that time you've got jim a court's response on comms embedded in the rule 43 pro forma document you've

00:49:51 in the rule 43 pro forma document you've also read this document at that meeting or at that time before ron dobson sent his 23rd of may letter to

00:49:59 to back to the coroner did you

00:50:03 did you think

00:50:04 think to raise the possibility of using mobile for telephones on the fire ground as a better means of communicating um between um

00:50:15 between um between officers on the fire ground by way of satisfying the coroner's recommendation that you look at personal communications uh no i didn't why is that um

00:50:27 uh no i didn't why is that um because we already had uh two command channels and

00:50:33 and the option for airwave radios plus a number of ancillary pieces of equipment to overcome um signal penetration issues that's the repeaters and the leaky feeders

00:50:46 repeaters and the leaky feeders and

00:50:47 and i would have probably at that time felt that that was sufficient to overcome the issues that are identified here right now you say you probably would have felt at that time it was sufficient to overcome the issues was

00:50:59 sufficient to overcome the issues was there any discussion of whether in fact that was so um i can't remember the discussion at that meeting as i expressed yesterday but as comms was one of the key issues i

00:51:11 but as comms was one of the key issues i can't rule out the fact that we didn't talk about we obviously did talk about comms but i can't remember the detailed discussion because it's a meeting that's over eight years ago did anybody think to

00:51:24 ask the question

00:51:27 do airwave radios solve the problem encountered at shirley towers which necessitated the use of mobile telephones

00:51:38 telephones um i don't recall that um and i think the comms issues that shirley tells from my understanding and i've spoke to officers that are more closely informed about shirley towers incident

00:51:50 informed about shirley towers incident that

00:51:51 that firefighters don't have lfb issued mobile telephony devices issued to them so if the issues were between the ba entry control that's indicating that it's actually junior officers and

00:52:04 that it's actually junior officers and firefighters and we we didn't at that time and i think the brigade still doesn't issue individual mobile phones to individual firefighters no we we wouldn't have had that capability at that time

00:52:17 that capability at that time no

00:52:18 no i i can ask the same question in relation to the latino house fire um in your preparations in may 2013 for the response to the coroner's rule 43 did anybody

00:52:29 did anybody stand back and consider whether airwave radios would have resolved the communications or help to resolve the communications problems encountered at latino house

00:52:40 again a similar answer lacrimal houses i understand it was slightly different issue um certainly didn't come up at the performance review of command so i think it was less of a command issue maybe a

00:52:51 it was less of a command issue maybe a firefighter issue so again firefighters are not issued with airwave radios so

00:52:58 so i don't think we're in a position to to roll out airwave radios to all firefighters at that time because the contract for airwave radios was coming to its end uh you know in theory it didn't hasn't materialized as i

00:53:10 it didn't hasn't materialized as i understand now which is not a brigade issue it's a national radio issue um

00:53:15 um but yeah i think our focus would have been on what is the capability we've got available right now um that we what can we use what we can develop is it proven to understand in better training that would have probably

00:53:27 better training that would have probably been the sense of the discussion as i recall it but you know i can't remember the detail of the exact discussion i'm afraid right now um

00:53:36 now um we understand that the replacement of the handheld uhf radios and the ba radios the breathing apparatus radios was given consideration during your time as dort is that right um i think there was discussion about

00:53:48 um i think there was discussion about starting a corporate project and i think that has been done now subsequently after i left so i think there was in the program we have a program of major projects that are

00:53:59 program of major projects that are coming up for the same reason i discussed yesterday you have to manage the resource commitments budgets and all the things that are related to major procurement and potentially training initiatives so uh it was certainly in the work

00:54:11 so uh it was certainly in the work program to look at a replacement radio system i think it was initially for the breathing apparatus but i think it's now been

00:54:18 been expanded to include fire ground radios well i was going to ask you do you remember something or a project called the replacement of incident ground communications it was on what we called the forward

00:54:29 it was on what we called the forward program of projects so there was a kind of look forward of what the major procurement projects were coming up which usually was linked to the life in policy for that particular piece of equipment

00:54:40 equipment and

00:54:41 and that that didn't expire in my time but there was talk about setting up a radio replacement project but i don't think the terms of reference for that project have been scoped during

00:54:52 for that project have been scoped during my time that the project as far as we could see was related to barry radios rather than yeah initially i think it started to with barry and i think it subsequently again post my retirement as being

00:55:04 again post my retirement as being extended to include fire ground radios as well yes now um let's go to lfb triple zero eight eight one eight eight

00:55:15 this is an operational resilience and training

00:55:18 training department um plan

00:55:22 plan for 2014 and 15 or 2014 to 15.

00:55:30 is this a document you're familiar with yes i've seen this before yes um now it's difficult to date this but our best guess of this documents date is the 15th of january 2015.

00:55:41 of january 2015. that'd be about right yes because if you look in the comments box on on the top line it talks about quarter three so obviously it's it's uh that update is for quarter three so this

00:55:52 that update is for quarter three so this would indicate this document uh is post dates quarter three of that fiscal year exactly that is precisely how we came to the conclusion that it was it was it was january 15. um

00:56:05 was it was january 15. um do you do you can you tell us what the purpose of this document was yes so every department had a departmental service plan which was linked to the corporate plan which for london was the london safety

00:56:17 which for london was the london safety plan the integrated risk management plan so the

00:56:20 so the fire authority would sign off on the corporate plan and then the work that flowed out of the corporate plan and the commitments in the corporate plan would a more granular level result in activities and projects

00:56:34 level result in activities and projects etc for each individual department so we had a system called the performance management framework and this is a product of that process so each header service would have had a

00:56:47 so each header service would have had a you know a work program and this is how we or certainly heads of service and directors would have managed the work program to hold their heads of service accountable for all the things that they put in their departmental plan for that

00:56:58 put in their departmental plan for that financial year right now the first item on the list is replacement of the ba radio interface equipment which is what barry stands for and if we move through the columns the end date in the second column you can see is listed as the 21st

00:57:09 column you can see is listed as the 21st of october 2015 and the owner as it were is jim a court yes yes and in the final column you can see the update on under the comments and it says this 7th january 2015 quarter 3

00:57:23 it says this 7th january 2015 quarter 3 during the information gathering stage for this activity it became apparent that the current battery sets are still available and supported and that they continue to operate effectively based on this information action has been taken

00:57:35 this information action has been taken to defer the replacement of barry and is radius until 2018 the relevant omb report has been written on behalf of the lead department i.t it is anticipated that this will be

00:57:46 it is anticipated that this will be accepted by cmb at that point this activity will be shown as

00:57:52 shown as complete now barry reset radios are just to be clear and perhaps remind people of phase one uh the radios embedded within the headsets of breathing apparatus

00:58:03 the headsets of breathing apparatus wearers aren't they um yeah and not all sets not all breeding operated sets but a number of them yes

00:58:11 them yes yes they wouldn't but they're they wouldn't appear anywhere else no they're specifically used with breathing operators now what information was gathered which would which did suggest that barrier sets were operating effectively as this says

00:58:23 effectively as this says i i

00:58:24 i i i wouldn't have seen that detail i mean it's the same officer that wrote the report

00:58:29 report jimmy called yeah it's the same officer but uh so there would have been some um scoping work as that in as that update indicates um i don't know if if you're going to take me to it but

00:58:40 going to take me to it but do you know what the relevancy cmb report is what's the date on that because that may work i don't remember seeing a report to corporate management board on this during my time well i think i was going to ask you that but um

00:58:52 think i was going to ask you that but um you don't but um just going back to my question um the inquiry heard evidence of phase one that many lfb fire firefighters considered that the uh the barry sets were unreliable and indeed

00:59:05 barry sets were unreliable and indeed ac cotton

00:59:07 ac cotton then commissioner cotton gave evidence that she was aware of that were you familiar with those concerns at this time which is just before you left

00:59:16 left um i wasn't aware that they were unreliable in a sense that there was a major corporate issue or an operational issue

00:59:27 corporate issue or an operational issue um there had been some issues with uh the roving of the the wiring um to the face mask which is where the the mic and the and the earpiece yes is work

00:59:38 mic and the and the earpiece yes is work so we'd had some issues and in fact it was a safety event where the cabling had burned through when firefighters had been in hot compartments and that caused the communications failure so we'd done some work to resolve the roving

00:59:50 done some work to resolve the roving issue um to respond to that uh accident investigation but i wasn't aware uh that there was a kind of major issue with uh equipment failure or or its

01:00:01 with uh equipment failure or or its ability to do what it was designed to do it was getting you know to the end of its life but as that said obviously it was still supported by the manufacturer and i assume the maintenance contract we

01:00:12 and i assume the maintenance contract we had for that right the roving issue is that a problem uh whereby the in lay terms the wiring becomes loose which then deprives the firefighter of the ability to use the radio in the

01:00:23 the ability to use the radio in the headset

01:00:25 headset that could be one issue but the the issue that resulted in the senior action investigation was the um cables melting right um so it was because they were on the outside of the firefighting tunic

01:00:37 firefighting tunic and and we took management action to you know uh train firefighters to rove it in a different way so that the cabling would be protected right were you aware of a different issue which is simply that the battery set could come loose

01:00:49 that the battery set could come loose just become disconnected no uh

01:00:53 uh given

01:00:53 given uh well um given what i think you have to take from me was the evidence of phase one that many lfp firefighters considered the barry sets to be unreliable confirmed by

01:01:04 sets to be unreliable confirmed by commissioner cotton at the time

01:01:08 and given the problems with radio transmission strength and rising out of the latin house incident as we've seen yesterday do you know why the radio replacement program wasn't prioritized um i don't think i saw that cmb report

01:01:21 um i don't think i saw that cmb report from the head of it which was julian martin who we spoke about yesterday i'm fairly certain i never saw that cmb report i assume that would have been part of the discussion

01:01:32 would have been part of the discussion in terms of it was a recommendation in that report to defer the replacement of it that would have been part of the discussion but if i wasn't at the meeting i can't really comment on that right so you to the best of your recollection simply

01:01:43 to the best of your recollection simply proceeded on what you were told in this comment column yes because i we wouldn't i wouldn't have made a decision on this this was a departmental plan to make sure that the you know the various groups within these

01:01:54 you know the various groups within these departments were doing the work that we'd set out at the start of the year so it was a kind of performance management as well as an informative document but you were ahead of this at this this department mrt weren't you i was

01:02:06 this department mrt weren't you i was the director uh i wasn't the head of the this department that was um uh jim knighton initially and then subsequently um peter callup uh

01:02:17 subsequently um peter callup uh yes sorry you were head of this directorate yes i was head of the directorate in my head so this is a head of service sort of document but i would have i would have reviewed this with the headset service well that was my next question when you reviewed this

01:02:30 question when you reviewed this with the heads of service did you interrogate them as to why they thought that the current barrier sets were

01:02:38 were continuing to operate effectively i think if the issue was relevant to my department specifically in terms of its performance i did integra i did obviously go through these with the

01:02:50 obviously go through these with the heads of service i think quarterly from memory

01:02:53 memory um i think i would have taken from that update um that there's there's no decision because this would be a corporate management bulk decision around procurement and corporate projects

01:03:02 projects so i would have assumed that a report would have been produced by the head of it as it says there and then we would have had a discussion at the corporate management board level to decide whether we'd accept that recommendation from the

01:03:13 we'd accept that recommendation from the head of it and hopefully that report would have set out you know the you know the advantages disadvantages costs and all the other things associated with a big procurement project

01:03:23 project and we would have made a decision based on the information within that report do you remember what it was well um

01:03:31 well um that the heads of that department told you by way of explaining to you that the barrier sets were continuing to operate effectively i i say i wouldn't have been involved in

01:03:42 i i say i wouldn't have been involved in the detail research so um jimmy call was our head of comms and and clearly had been the head of commerce for quite a long time and had a body of knowledge and experience in in this field

01:03:53 field so

01:03:55 so we would of course listen to his views if it had been expressed in the cnb report

01:04:00 report but i i wouldn't be able to comment on the content of why he's making that proposal other than what it says in the in the words in that box now i want to show you a document that long post dates your departure from the

01:04:12 long post dates your departure from the nfb

01:04:13 nfb it's at nfb double zero one zero five four six six

01:04:19 it's a report entitled review of the specification for fire ground breathing apparatus radios dated the 29th of october 2019 so more than two years after the

01:04:30 so more than two years after the grenfell tower fire itself and it was prepared by the assistant commissioner operational policy and assurance

01:04:40 assurance for the for the commissioner's board of the lfc

01:04:44 the lfc um and if we go to page six uh sorry page two paragraph six we can see that it says this this issue has been highlighted

01:04:55 has been highlighted by a number of fire and rescue services and i i shall just explain this issue relates to the um transmission power which is covered in the previous

01:05:07 which is covered in the previous paragraph or two thank you question of i.s this issue has been highlighted by a number of fire and rescue services and in a number of investigations undertaken by the brigade where poor communications

01:05:18 by the brigade where poor communications at incidents including poor radio performance has been identified as a hazard and or factor that has contributed to injury to operational staff

01:05:27 staff furthermore interviews with brigade firefighters suggest that due to experience with the poor signal propagation of ba radios confidence in the equipment is low and therefore it is common practice for b18s to enter

01:05:38 common practice for b18s to enter smoke-filled environments fires with their non-is 4-watt fire-ground radios on their tunics to improve communications well the use of a medium to high standard of is radio for ba operations

01:05:50 standard of is radio for ba operations has been the historical norm in the uk in recent years many fire and rescue services have moved away from the use of is radios entirely and or reduced the standards of is protection associated

01:06:01 standards of is protection associated with their ba radio equipment this has been predominantly justified through a requirement to increase the effectiveness of ba radio communications i.e increasing available transmitting power and through the general

01:06:12 power and through the general observation that firefighters may carry with them a range of other equipment that is not rated for intrinsic safety there is an additional benefit in that non-is radios can be significantly less

01:06:23 non-is radios can be significantly less expensive to purchase and maintain than their is counterparts however national operational guidance nog states that frs should consider that an explosive atmosphere is likely to occur in normal

01:06:35 atmosphere is likely to occur in normal operation and so a level of is should be retained

01:06:39 retained now during your tenure i've taken that at one go but there are a number of questions during your tenure at the lfb were you aware of this issue being highlighted by other fire and rescue services

01:06:50 services um only in the context of uh the shirley towers report i think the harrow court fatal fire review which is a fire in hertfordshire where two firefighters sadly died i think had some

01:07:02 firefighters sadly died i think had some communications issues but not not intrinsic safety ones i'd from rep from my memory um but not widely uh reported uh in the british fire service but

01:07:13 uh in the british fire service but certainly

01:07:14 certainly there were documents like the shirley towers report where this issue was was highlighted

01:07:24 leaving aside those

01:07:26 those other fires shirley towers and harrow courts

01:07:30 courts and perhaps looking at incidents where there were there were no fatalities were you aware of a number of investigations in other words a body of evidence

01:07:41 in other words a body of evidence highlighting poor communications uh no i wasn't right were you aware that ba teams frequently used their handheld uhf radios in place of ba radios without incident commander approval uh no i

01:07:53 incident commander approval uh no i wasn't

01:07:53 wasn't were you aware that many fire and rescue services had moved away from using is radios and or had reduced the level of intrinsic safety as explained here no i wasn't

01:08:04 safety as explained here no i wasn't would you expect that kind of information to have been gathered by your directorate and communicated to you during your time as director i i think in terms of particularly given the timing of the

01:08:15 the timing of the barry project uh that may have been some of the research i don't know if this is a 2019 document so some of these issues may have been uh more recent to the publication of this

01:08:26 more recent to the publication of this document rather than the time that i served but this is the sort of research that you would anticipate a project team that's looking to re-procure you know a major piece of operational equipment

01:08:37 major piece of operational equipment that's linked to you know safe systems of work would have taken into account and that this this sort of information would have come forward as part of a uh recommendation to go forward with the

01:08:48 recommendation to go forward with the procurement of a particular you know type of radio solution but i i didn't see any of this and it wasn't brought to my attention when i was the director right

01:08:57 right now given that the draft rule 43 pro forma that we looked at yesterday and we can go back to it if we need to explicitly consider the possible reconsideration of intrinsically safe radios in bayer sets

01:09:10 radios in bayer sets do you accept the possibility of using non-intrinsically safe radios in high-rise fires where there was no risk of an explosive environment and that that fact was known to your directorate in 2013. that the the potential to use

01:09:22 in 2013. that the the potential to use non-is radios is obviously uh you can do that radios are somehow is and some aren't uh

01:09:31 uh i'd refer to the answer i gave yesterday that your statement there says it you know i can't remember the exact words but you might not need is protection in a high-rise fire as i said yesterday

01:09:43 a high-rise fire as i said yesterday i don't agree with that i accept that the

01:09:45 the ignition source in a fire compartment is the fire itself but i don't accept that there is never the potential for a flammable gas uh a gas leak you know build up of um

01:09:57 uh a gas leak you know build up of um flammable gases from the fire itself in a different part of the building isn't an explosive risk and i i really honestly believe that if we'd have tried even if we'd have tried to introduce non-is radios i think

01:10:08 tried to introduce non-is radios i think we would not have got agreement with the fire brigade union to do that and i know that's speculation which is probably not helpful for the inquiry but i'm just trying to set out the context of my period um i just think we would not um

01:10:22 period um i just think we would not um in that period of industrial relations and in fact from a safety point of view be looking to downgrade the level of protection that we've already got to a worse level now i understand just looking at the text of paragraph six it's clear from

01:10:35 text of paragraph six it's clear from this report and as i stressed this is october 2019 uh

01:10:40 uh there had grown up a practice as it says in the penultimate line for ba teams to enter smoke-filled environments with their non-is4 watt fire ground radius on their tunics to improve communications

01:10:52 in your time to what extent was that ever the subject of a robust risk assessment so that the brigade could actually satisfy itself of whether the risk you

01:11:03 satisfy itself of whether the risk you averted to yesterday and just now was a risk that was worth taking in order to save life in the building or was a risk that wasn't worth taking

01:11:14 or was a risk that wasn't worth taking because it exposed the firefighters to too greater risk was that assessment ever actually done no why is that i don't think it was the brigade's position that we'd move away from

01:11:25 position that we'd move away from national guidance on this particular safety issue at the time that that would be my personal view and

01:11:31 and and the other thing i think is worth just mentioning might be helpful for context is the issue with firefighters using their handheld radios which is the non-is radio

01:11:41 radio i think if that had become a significant practice that we'd have witnessed

01:11:47 witnessed during my time that would have featured as a safety issue and near-miss potentially as we called them or it would have certainly made its way in the incident management

01:11:58 made its way in the incident management performance reports that came quarterly to the odcb because that would have been a concern around safe systems of work i never saw a comms issue in relation to this

01:12:09 comms issue in relation to this particular issue that came forward now um

01:12:12 now um can i move to a different topic or sub topic

01:12:16 topic which is radio repeaters and leaky feeders you referred to those earlier this morning yeah and uh tcap training

01:12:24 training uh can we go back then to the lfb's response to the rule 43 recommendations of may 2013 at lfb three zeros four two zero eight nine

01:12:37 just throw up the first page just to remind you of what we're looking at this is the dobson letter uh to the coroner of the 23rd of may 2013 2013 if we go to page eight in that

01:12:49 2013 if we go to page eight in that please we can look at the bottom of page eight uh and this is recommendation five you can see the hold off on your screen and proposed action on uh at the bottom of the page which says this

01:13:00 of the page which says this while for the reasons given above the brigade respect respectfully argues against a change in procedure concerning the use of multiple ba channels he will be taking the following action to address the lessons learned from the

01:13:11 address the lessons learned from the latino house fire bullet point the brigade will engage with its training contractor to ensure that issues relating to incident communications are embedded within the current operational training

01:13:24 time scale this work has already commenced and is estimated to be completed by december 2013. and what were the issues relating to incident communications which were the subject of this proposal

01:13:37 subject of this proposal um i think it was the issues highlighted by the coroner about

01:13:44 difficulties with communication uh i say i think it was more with firefighters than command officers at lacanal

01:13:52 lacanal um

01:13:54 so the issue would have been about the whole issue of communications

01:14:00 know using the right piece of equipment the right channel the options for using different channels as we touched on yesterday channel one channel two channel five channel six and

01:14:11 and uh when you experience radio difficulties uh what options and equipment do you have available as firefighters officers incident commanders to try and assist to overcome

01:14:23 commanders to try and assist to overcome that radio communications issues that that's what i understood the issues to cover

01:14:35 i wonder if we can boil that answer down a little bit more specifically what

01:14:41 what this letter tells the coroner is that this is about training brigade will engage with its training contractor to ensure that the issues relating to incident communications are embedded within the current operational

01:14:52 embedded within the current operational training

01:14:53 training what were you going to be teaching your firefighters and incident commanders about communications which would resolve the problem identified by the coroner which gave rise to this

01:15:04 the coroner which gave rise to this recommendation my understanding would be similar what i just said is the equipment available the channels highlighting the issue of

01:15:15 the channels highlighting the issue of signal propagation obviously explaining that there is these issues with certain types of buildings you can experience radio communication difficulties and then the procedures equipment

01:15:29 and then the procedures equipment and tactics that you may deploy to overcome

01:15:32 overcome some of those radio issues i i think you'd agree with me that this wasn't actually a response to the coroner's recommendation uh

01:15:40 uh the recommendation was to the lfb to consider using additional ba and personal cons and incidents not to improve its training yes yes

01:15:48 yes yes but i think the the first paragraph under proposed actions we obviously respectfully argued against a change in that procedure but in but you yeah you rejected that but but as it were told that you'd improve

01:16:00 but as it were told that you'd improve training yes to try and improve you know operational staff's understanding of what you can do when you experience communication difficulties now let's turn to lfb3086741

01:16:12 this is an email chain the week before and it relates to the meeting that we know you had on the 14th of may 2013 with the commissioners group

01:16:23 with the commissioners group and if we can go to page two in the email run please this is an email from you to

01:16:30 to a group so we can see dave brown james knighton danny cotton steve turek glenn seabright etc

01:16:40 etc copy to ron dobson rita dexter sue budden and david atkinson uh all as promised please find below a brief summary of the issues that were discussed and in some cases agreed during the two latino meetings held

01:16:51 during the two latino meetings held earlier today but just pausing there those were the meetings that we saw the invitation for i think in the emails yesterday or the day before uh i think the email you showed me yesterday the

01:17:02 the email you showed me yesterday the invitation email was for the commissioner groups plus the heads of service that we're going to undertake the actions um i think

01:17:10 i think this uh meeting request that i chaired was only for the officers to put together their proposals and this was the the two meetings to review their where we got to by this date i follow i

01:17:21 where we got to by this date i follow i follow now um if we um go to page three please we can see a heading out comes from the second meeting

01:17:29 meeting and what you've just said in your last answer i think relates to the second meeting doesn't it it's a matter of logic yeah yes now can we go down please to recommendation five at the foot of your screen

01:17:40 at the foot of your screen recommendation five incident communications um this email says this it was agreed that we should state with supporting evidence why we do not agree with the first part of the coroner's recommendation to consider additional bae channel radio channels i will work

01:17:53 bae channel radio channels i will work with jim and dave to draft this evidence which will use the benefits versus risks argument to support our position however it was accepted that it would be advisable to offset this by committing to undertake additional awareness

01:18:05 to undertake additional awareness raising on incident communication through some form of training across the various staff groups and what exactly were you proposing to raise awareness of

01:18:17 um you know the whole broad church of incident communications from the equipment provision available to firefighters and officers the use of the various radio channels

01:18:29 the use of the various radio channels that were in use at the time and overcoming any communications failures what what additional equipment procedures and on options are available to incident commanders to resolve some of those

01:18:42 commanders to resolve some of those issues that you might experience

01:18:48 and with this with the some form of training

01:18:53 um what did you have in mind by by some form of training uh well again the the training commissioning process would decide the actual format of the training but i'm certainly

01:19:03 certainly uh expecting something different than just the policy no the policy note was available to people

01:19:09 people we had an intercommunications policy note and notes for all the individual training sorry the equipment that that was in use at the time so i i probably would envisage at this point that this would probably result in

01:19:21 point that this would probably result in a station training support package of some kind and a senior officer computer-based training training solution yes and by offset in the penultimate line there did

01:19:32 offset in the penultimate line there did you mean

01:19:33 you mean a sop to the coroner no not at all i think it was just

01:19:38 just uh to acknowledge that we we accepted that there were issues at lacanal so we weren't just dismissing the coroner's recommendations for the reasons that

01:19:49 recommendations for the reasons that you've seen in some of the highlighted texts from yesterday's document there was a genuine concern that additional radio ba channels would actually create more problems than it would solve

01:20:00 would solve and to be respectful to that uh that we but we accepted that there were issues that with radio comms weren't just specific to ba comms uh at lacanal and that we would take the appropriate

01:20:12 and that we would take the appropriate action to try and improve our performance in that area right um i mean you say that but the context of the offset remark here is that you were using a benefits against risks

01:20:23 were using a benefits against risks argument to support the effectively the rejection of her recommendation uh but

01:20:30 uh but it was accepted that it would be advisable to offset this by committing to undertake additional awareness raising

01:20:37 raising it looks on the face of it that the lfb put simply didn't like her recommendation was going to argue against it but felt that it had to give her something to placate her would that be fair

01:20:47 be fair no i don't think that's fair if we'd have not accepted a recommendation i think as an organization we would have felt comfortable to reject it and obviously respectfully given other reasons why um

01:20:58 um i think we did acknowledge uh

01:21:01 uh as a group that came together to put this response together that we were not going to be complacent in this area there were clearly radio issues that had been reported through the lachnal investigation report

01:21:13 the lachnal investigation report and that we would take appropriate action to try and improve our performance in that area let's go back to the communications rule 43 pro forma at lfb3034062

01:21:25 and can we go to page 10.

01:21:30 and if we look at the very top row this is a continuation of the considerations row we looked at yesterday and if you look at the last paragraph

01:21:41 and if you look at the last paragraph the italics read as follows training and familiarization of using radio equipment there is currently sufficient policy guidance on radio use however there is minimal continuation

01:21:53 however there is minimal continuation training beyond the basic course within the firefighter development program the development of further training has been carried out by the brigade and their training provider babcock these training packages for all operational personnel are expected to be

01:22:05 operational personnel are expected to be completed in may 2013 and then um you've got in addition the first bullet of the row below which is the

01:22:14 the one of the proposals to address the rule 43 recommendations and it says this raise all operational personnel's awareness of the identification of communications incident issues at incidents and the

01:22:26 incident issues at incidents and the methods of overcoming them these include the use of uhf channel 2 repeater and leaky feeder equipment the completion of training materials and the requirement to carry out training by all operational personnel on the use of radio equipment

01:22:38 personnel on the use of radio equipment will reinforce and raise awareness of potential radio issues at incidents and improve radio discipline now just to be clear uhf channel 2 repeater and leakapedia feeder equipment

01:22:50 repeater and leakapedia feeder equipment is a reference isn't it to the portable equipment that can be used by the lfb to boost or enhance weak radio signals it it is and there's also a fixed uhf

01:23:02 it it is and there's also a fixed uhf channel 2 repeater that's fitted to all command units as well but yes in principle that's exactly what it says yes and subject to that was it the brigade's intention at this time since april may

01:23:13 april may 2013 that radio repeaters and leaky feeders should be the primary means of overcoming communications issues yes i think that's true yes and is it right the radio repeaters and leaky

01:23:25 right the radio repeaters and leaky feeders weren't in fact deployed at the latin house fire in 2009

01:23:31 i honestly can't remember if they were or they weren't right now um former commissioner ron dobson gave evidence to the latin house inquest on the 15th of march 2013.

01:23:43 house inquest on the 15th of march 2013. and i just want to show you the transcript of that day it was day 42 of the inquest can we please go to cwj 6010

01:23:52 6010 page 70.

01:23:59 now can we have that expanded a little bit please so we can see it a little bit more clearly um i'd like to pick it up in

01:24:08 in council's question at line 22

01:24:13 where he was asked

01:24:17 what are your views on how best to overcome radio communications problems which as i understand it can have two causes one is communication blind spots in a high-rise building or a steel frame building and if you turn the page the

01:24:29 building and if you turn the page the other is sheer volume of information and in response uh if you look at page 71 at line two the commissioner says this

01:24:40 the commissioner says this taking those two aspects it's not firefighters in london are not uncommon with communications difficulty related to the building environment in which we work

01:24:49 work so radio signals from the report we've commissioned or many reports particularly one that we commissioned following lateral house once again identified and confirmed the signals worked best when they're in clear line

01:25:00 worked best when they're in clear line of sight of each other's radios in high-rise buildings which are constructed from steel construction and steel and concrete there are many factors which will what do something which we call shield the signal from

01:25:13 which we call shield the signal from from getting to the radio or the one that's intended to get to these things are not uncommon to fire fighters in the london fire brigade we are i think unusual in relation to other brigades that

01:25:23 that in order to try and overcome some of these problems we issue every firefighter with a personal issue radio so that we can try to make sure that important messages to get through i don't believe that other brigades do the same but we certainly do issue a

01:25:35 same but we certainly do issue a personal radio to every firefighter and can i just jump ahead in his is his evidence to page 73 two pages on and pick up pick it up at line five

01:25:46 pick up pick it up at line five and he says this if we can just expand it so you can see it with me so in terms of addressing this problem for the future

01:25:53 future and

01:25:54 and and it is at many incident debriefs that we've attended over the years incident ground communication is often very is very often raised in terms of an issue and that does relate to the

01:26:05 issue and that does relate to the shielding of the buildings and sometimes the traffic if the shielding of the building is a problem then there are other facilities available to incident commanders to seek to overcome that as i recall i think mr holland referred yesterday to leaky feeders which is

01:26:17 yesterday to leaky feeders which is basically a cable or an aerial that we run out of the off the drum like an extension lead through a building or through an area and that will pick up the signal and transmit it back to the base station they are predominantly in

01:26:28 base station they are predominantly in place for long tunnels and for things like use on london underground where the communication issues between radios is even the communication difficulties between radios is much greater than it usually is above ground and it would not

01:26:40 usually is above ground and it would not be the incident commander's first choice to use leaky feeders in a scenario such as lachenal because they would firstly they would divert attention from other priority tasks to lay the cable out but more

01:26:52 to lay the cable out but more importantly they would institute and would represent a further hazard in the stairwell where they have to lay the cable up so it would not be the incident commander's preference but it would be a piece of equipment that would be available to them

01:27:06 now given

01:27:08 given commissioner dobson as he then was is evidence that leaky feeders would not be an incident commander's first choice but the reasons he's identified why was the decision taken to release

01:27:19 why was the decision taken to release training on their deployment and use in response to the lack of coroner's rule 43 recommendations um

01:27:27 um i can't answer that i i think um the way

01:27:32 the way the training was presented i don't think i've seen the training um would have been that it's when you experience difficulties wouldn't be what you use as your first line of communication that would be

01:27:45 line of communication that would be through your battery set and if you're not in

01:27:48 not in an area

01:27:49 an area where there's smoke or any flammable gases then you can use your personal issue fire ground radio they would be your kind of primary methods of communication

01:28:00 kind of primary methods of communication but when you experience which i believe the training was designed to to exemplify that if you do experience then you do have repeaters and leaky feeders available as a kind of secondary

01:28:12 feeders available as a kind of secondary or tertiary option for overcoming communication signal problems

01:28:20 did the lfb reconsider its policy on the use of of repeaters and leaky feeders in residential high-rise fires following the latino house fire um i don't think we had a specific

01:28:31 um i don't think we had a specific policy that said you should or shouldn't use them it's just a communication capability that is available to incident commanders should they experience instant communication

01:28:43 they experience instant communication difficulties yes you see the commission as i've shown you from his own evidence explain the practical problems which lay in the way of the incident commander treating it as a primary preference whether a communications

01:28:55 preference whether a communications difficulties in high-rise buildings in the light of that evidence did the lfb stand back and actually ask itself where the use of repeaters and leaky feeders should sit in the hierarchy of

01:29:06 feeders should sit in the hierarchy of of

01:29:07 of alternative approaches to communications where they are experienced at high-rise fires i

01:29:13 fires i don't believe uh i was aware of a piece of work that does what you're describing um i would have assumed that the commissioning department that looked at the new training

01:29:23 training would have only looked at it in the context was what was currently available well let's look at that um that's tcap0039 and we have the form at lfb 404729

01:29:39 let's have the first page up

01:29:43 um there it is is that the training you're referring to um

01:29:49 um use of authority issued rainy communication equipment yeah i wouldn't have seen this document at the time but yes that is the document well you you you say that let's let's see um can we go to page

01:30:01 let's let's see um can we go to page three please

01:30:07 now on page three we can see the version control list there and the date of version one was the 27th of july 2012

01:30:16 2012 and the last version 1.3 final version was the 10th of march 2015. uh the last one i think post dates your departure by two months or so yeah three

01:30:27 departure by two months or so yeah three buttons yeah uh yeah

01:30:30 uh yeah but it but the first three versions one 1.1 and 1.2 are all during your tenure as dort that's correct yes um

01:30:41 that's correct yes um uh

01:30:43 uh so

01:30:44 so it looks as if is this right just looking at these dates that this training need had had in fact been identified and developed sometime before the coroner's rule 43

01:30:56 sometime before the coroner's rule 43 recommendation uh yes i think the timing and chronology there indicates and i think one of the jimmycourt's emails refers to that that there's already work ongoing with

01:31:07 that there's already work ongoing with the training yes contractor so yes it predates the coroners yes and i was going to ask you that the email we saw from jimmy caught earlier picks this up yeah right now um can we go to page seven

01:31:18 right now um can we go to page seven please under background and context uh and and you can see uh that's the box as is often the case with this because it's a pro forma um on page seven fourth

01:31:29 it's a pro forma um on page seven fourth box down background context what is the problem and the text says this with the introduction of new radios it has been identified that there is a training need to ensure all operational personnel have the knowledge and understanding to use

01:31:41 the knowledge and understanding to use authority issued radio communications equipment in accordance with brigade policy to ensure effective communications at incidents this training will cover handheld radios with associated equipment and airwave main

01:31:52 associated equipment and airwave main scheme both appliance and senior officer radios

01:31:56 radios is the reference there to new radios a reference to the replacement of the maxon radio by the hx series uh

01:32:05 uh i know you asked me this yesterday about what date was the fireground radios replaced um it was definitely after the bethel green fire which was 2004 and i my best

01:32:17 fire which was 2004 and i my best recollection is it was around 2007 and 8. airwave was introduced which is the senior officer digital radios in i believe 2009 um so i assume it is the replacement

01:32:30 um so i assume it is the replacement handheld radio that they're referring to in the start of that sentence i mean even in 12 2012 those wouldn't be no there

01:32:40 no there yeah i wouldn't describe them as new at that point right but you can't think of anything else can you i don't believe we purchased any new equipment

01:32:47 equipment in my time right now given that that training was the means or to be the means by which the lfb responded to the latino coroner's rule 43 recommendation even though developed beforehand

01:32:58 even though developed beforehand can you tell us why this form did not refer to her recommendation all the communications difficulties experienced at lachnal given that the last version of it is march 2015

01:33:10 last version of it is march 2015 two years after her rule 43 recommendations just under uh i i can't answer that because i obviously didn't see this does the the later versions were they updated to reflect uh the work

01:33:23 were they updated to reflect uh the work that was done in respect to the coroner's rule well we go back to page three this is the last version oh sorry this is the sorry no i think it's mid-march 2016. oh this is the 15 version is it yes okay sorry um

01:33:35 version is it yes okay sorry um yes i would have expected it to at least reference the current rule 43s and the decisions as i've described in previous answers about the scope of what we were trying to achieve with these two packages yeah do you know why it doesn't

01:33:46 packages yeah do you know why it doesn't no i don't right were you involved in considering uh

01:33:51 uh this

01:33:52 this training having kicked it off as an idea as an offset to the coroner's recommendation uh back in may 2013. no i wouldn't have been involved in the

01:34:03 no i wouldn't have been involved in the development of the tcat process i'd say do i take it that you weren't involved in considering babcock's development uh of

01:34:12 uh of this

01:34:13 this of a case study for this training or no i didn't ever see them until the case studies were produced normally did you sign off on the case studies uh no i didn't have any involvement in the

01:34:24 didn't have any involvement in the business process of signing off training that was developed by babcock through this process well we'll see how we go with the next set of questions mr chairman it's probably a convenient moment to take the break yes all right uh

01:34:35 uh but if you're going on to another group of questions perhaps we should yes we're staying within the topic but we're going on to some follow-on questions but it's a convenient moment because we're about to look at a new documentary we'll take our morning break at that point mr

01:34:46 our morning break at that point mr reason we'll come back at half past 11 please

01:34:50 please and as usual please don't talk to anyone about your evidence while you're out of the room lovely thank you thank you very much

01:35:04 thank you how fast 11 please

01:52:36 would you ask mr reason to come back in please

01:52:47 thank you all right mr reason you're ready to carry on i certainly have thank you very much yes yes mr chairman thank you mr reason can we please go to lfb double zero one double two eight four six

01:53:02 this is the babcock produced station based training on radio equipment

01:53:07 equipment version one and its date if you look at the top of the screen is 14th of march 2014. if we go to page two you can see the four objectives

01:53:18 you can see the four objectives of the session by the end of this session you will be able to

01:53:22 able to list the range of a radio equipment used operationally within the london fire brigade describe the function of the radio equipment select radio equipment appropriate for use in operational scenarios demonstrate the assembly and

01:53:34 scenarios demonstrate the assembly and use of barry radio equipment and the package then goes on to describe key items of communications equipment they're just pausing at this point did

01:53:45 they're just pausing at this point did is this a training package you ever saw at all

01:53:48 at all no i didn't no um if we go to page 14 you'll see the description of the key items of communications equipment page 14

01:53:56 14 breathing apparatus interface equipment this is barry intrinsically safe radio equipment suitable for use in potentially explosive atmospheres fully splash proof and submersible integrated with barry set appliances carry two

01:54:08 with barry set appliances carry two battery sets and the next uh at page 20 if we go to that next slide

01:54:15 slide at 20

01:54:17 at 20 radio repeater capability this equipment enables radio communications to be established in locations where the signal is limited due to location such as large basements or sub-basements it is possible to use the repeater in

01:54:29 it is possible to use the repeater in both surface and subsurface environments as a standalone unit or connected to other repeaters in series mode with the supplied power cable and then if you go to the next slide at page 21 please you can see it says this

01:54:43 radio repeater availability 17 uhf repeaters are available one repeater carried on each command unit can also be used in conjunction with a leaky feeder also carried by the cu if

01:54:55 leaky feeder also carried by the cu if additional repeaters are required the ic must request them through control now

01:55:01 now as far as we've been able to tell that's the totality of the guidance in this training

01:55:06 training package on the use of repeaters you're not familiar with it as you've told us

01:55:12 told us have you any reason to disagree with this proposition that this package contained only a basic description as i've read to you of the lfb's communications equipment and didn't prepare crews for the difficulties that

01:55:24 prepare crews for the difficulties that may be encountered in high-rise buildings such as those experienced at latino house um

01:55:30 um i haven't seen the rest of the presentation but i'll take your word for it that it appears from that and the intended learning outcomes that are clearly

01:55:38 clearly communications failures doesn't appear to be covered in the learning outcome which i would have assumed it would have been given our previous discussion before the break so yeah accepting that it doesn't develop

01:55:49 yeah accepting that it doesn't develop this issue further in the remainder of the package i accept that right and it doesn't for example tell you how to plug in a leaky feeder or where to plug it in or a repeater and get it to work uh it

01:56:00 or a repeater and get it to work uh it doesn't apparently no not from what i've seen no

01:56:03 seen no uh

01:56:04 uh were you aware of any training package that prepared crews for the wholesale loss of communication or how to restore uh communications um if it's not in this

01:56:15 uh communications um if it's not in this package i think uh what i saw in the tcap is that apart from the

01:56:21 from the phase one firefighter development and phase two firefighter development which covers instant communications and i haven't seen those packages either so they may contain more information that this was a package designed to

01:56:33 this was a package designed to in effect

01:56:35 in effect deal with those issues raised by the coroner and other issues that we'd picked up from other incidents let's then turn to the senior office package senior officer package at lfb 001

01:56:47 001 22844

01:56:54 this is the radio equipment senior officer training version 1 initial upload 6th of march 2014. so the week before the version for station based staff we saw just now and if we go to

01:57:05 staff we saw just now and if we go to page 3 on this document you can see the objectives of the package listed on completion of this package you will be able to describe the functions and use of the analog handheld radio radio repeater and digital mainstream radio

01:57:17 repeater and digital mainstream radio describe situations where interagency voice communications and procedures can be used and how it would be implemented identify and find solutions for radio communication issues apply your knowledge of how radio equipment can be

01:57:28 knowledge of how radio equipment can be used to an exercise scenario now

01:57:32 now in relation to radio communications issues

01:57:36 issues it appears that the relevant slides start at page 23 if we can go to that and i'll just show you that

01:57:44 it reads as follows page 23

01:57:48 page 23 communications issues and select radio communications roll over the images below for more information about how these issues can be resolved so it looks like an interactive training package would that be right

01:58:00 training package would that be right yeah that looks like it would be an interactive package yes uh and it says in the box radio relay where poor communications are experienced it's possible to relay messages from one

01:58:12 possible to relay messages from one handheld radio to another uh

01:58:16 uh on the face of this document did this adequately inform senior officers of the way in which high-rise materials such as concrete and metal steel can disrupt radio signals if

01:58:27 metal steel can disrupt radio signals if this is the only slide that covers communications issues no it doesn't no there are a series or is a series of slides at page 17 if we go back five pages six pages or so mr miller i'm

01:58:38 pages six pages or so mr miller i'm sorry to interrupt you but um as you've already read out the this screen invites you to roll over the images for more information yes i wonder whether there's more information we ought to be

01:58:50 there's more information we ought to be aware of uh they're making sure we're getting to them

01:58:53 them no i'm because i'm not sure we have the capability of rolling this over ourselves here live well i'm sure we don't live on the screen but do we have a copy of what you would see if you were to roll over this

01:59:05 if you were to roll over this these particular parts of the screen uh standing here i'm not i'm not able to answer that question but i'm quite sure i can

01:59:12 i can provide an answer

01:59:16 and we do we do and we've we've we have rolled it over and i'm i'm told from those who have that it provides no more information um which would um adequately inform senior officers of the

01:59:28 adequately inform senior officers of the way in which high-rise materials such as concrete and metal disrupt radio signals all right that isn't there thank you very much um now can we go back to page 17 which

01:59:38 17 which uh we can see explores functionality of radio repeaters and leaky feeders and

01:59:46 and again i mean there's no distinction it it looks on the face of it in these slides between or this slide between radio repeaters and telemetry repeaters if we just roll forward let's look at

01:59:58 if we just roll forward let's look at 17. now look at 18. if we look at 18 radio repeater function modes and there's some text which isn't very clear below it i'll read it out to you

02:00:09 clear below it i'll read it out to you single repeater is deployed in stand-alone mode to boost signal coverage

02:00:13 coverage when used in standalone mode the repeater can be operated by using the fist microphone i think that says to transmit and the internal speaker to monitor radio traffic

02:00:26 monitor radio traffic if it helps miss a minute i can confirm that this is uhf radio repeaters used in conjunction with fire ground radios right

02:00:38 i'm told that if we go to page 22 to 26 of this slide

02:00:43 slide show

02:00:45 show that that's the rollover material of the rolled over material if we go to 23

02:00:53 uh and 24

02:00:56 and then 25.

02:01:02 yeah the images are the same yeah the things that change is the blue box is giving an update on whatever box your different text i think that's how it works uh it looks from this that the lfb

02:01:13 works uh it looks from this that the lfb didn't propose to train its crews and senior officers uh on the distinction between radio repeaters and telemetry repeaters uh certainly from what i've seen in this package and i say this is

02:01:24 seen in this package and i say this is the first time i've seen it so

02:01:27 so telemetry was rolled out uh as a new piece of equipment including the telemetry repeaters i believe in 2014 from memory

02:01:38 2014 from memory and i can't remember if there was a separate training package

02:01:43 package when the new telemetry boards and associated equipment was rolled out i would imagine it would have been because it's quite a significant piece of safety equipment but i can't confirm that

02:01:53 that so it might be there is a separate package relating specifically to telemetry boards and associated equipment i can't confirm that right now um peter graves told the inquiry that

02:02:05 um peter graves told the inquiry that although this tcap was signed off as complete in may 2015 so after you left it was never in fact released because of i.t issues um

02:02:15 um can you help us with that at all certainly in 2014 i became aware um that there were issues with training packages that included embedded

02:02:27 training packages that included embedded video footage so that was raised given to me by uh james douglas she was the head of human resource and development and i believe around the

02:02:38 and i believe around the middle of 2014 uh mr douglas was tasked by the odcb to go and speak to the head of it

02:02:46 of it to see if

02:02:47 to see if we could overcome whatever the problem was with the packages and i think from memory

02:02:54 memory it

02:02:55 it it was not that the package didn't work it was just inconsistent in its performance across the whole of the network so um we've got you know 100 fire stations and other locations so the

02:03:08 fire stations and other locations so the wide area network as we called it which is kind of like the pipes that go to the station that you feed information down it wasn't providing a consistent level of performance and i think that was the issue that was

02:03:20 and i think that was the issue that was raised with me it was impacting on the kind of user experience at fire stations the problem didn't exist at headquarters because we had a bigger bandwidth in the headquarters building so we didn't

02:03:32 headquarters building so we didn't suffer when we when we reviewed training we didn't have that problem and so james was tasked by uh miss dexter as the chair of odcb to speak to the head of it to see if there was any

02:03:45 the head of it to see if there was any interim solutions and the reason i used the word intrim is there was already a corporate project to upgrade the wide area network which was the network to all five brigade premises and that was

02:03:56 all five brigade premises and that was due to be

02:03:57 due to be i kind of if it was due to start into december 2015 or be completed in december 2015 but it was certainly quite a way away and obviously we didn't want to wait that long um so certainly james

02:04:09 to wait that long um so certainly james would have raised the issue uh of um

02:04:14 um the kind of performance issue if that's what it was uh with the head of i.t but i don't know if that's the reason why this package was delayed i don't know the answer right um now let's look

02:04:25 know the answer right um now let's look at the

02:04:25 at the final monitoring update you gave to the latino house working group for its meeting on the 31st of march 2014. we looked at it yesterday it's at nfb double zero double one seven

02:04:36 double zero double one seven six six zero

02:04:42 that's the first page we saw yesterday and item three is the rule 43 action plan and item five is the update report and if we go to um page 27

02:04:57 you can see the start of the action plan monitoring report and you can see action update march 2014 um for comms can we please go to page 33

02:05:13 go to the bottom row on that page

02:05:18 and um you can see we uh we looked at this yesterday i think yeah considers whether it would be beneficial to use additional uh breathing apparatus radio communication channels and personal

02:05:29 communication channels and personal radio channels a major incidence to reduce the amount of traffic on each channel that's the coroner's recommendation number five and if you look at the right hand side action update it says this um target date december 2013 two training

02:05:42 target date december 2013 two training packages have been commissioned for babcock to provide training to all operational personnel on the available communications equipment and its effective use of operational incidents the incidents chosen within these

02:05:53 the incidents chosen within these packages include both high-rise and subsurface with scenarios that demonstrate how certain communication issues can be resolved using lfb equipment currently carried on command units

02:06:04 units the first of these packages has now been completed and published the second package which is aimed at senior officers was signed off on mar in on march 14

02:06:16 on march 14 and will be published in april now i think we've seen am i right both packages

02:06:24 packages we looked at the training package uh tcap and we looked at the packaging station-based officers and senior officers

02:06:33 officers given that uh as peter graves told us the tcap form wasn't signed off as complete until may 2015. can you explain why you told the latin

02:06:44 can you explain why you told the latin house working group in march 2014 that the station-based package had been completed and published when that couldn't have been the case

02:06:54 the simple answer is no but i noticed on the uh training package solution that you showed them that the date it said it i commend what the term was at the top

02:07:05 commend what the term was at the top it's been loaded i think was

02:07:07 was uh consistent with the the update here um

02:07:13 um now whether there was something that happened after i reported this i was surprised by the 2015 date if i'm honest um

02:07:21 honest um this is the update obviously we took through odcp that came probably from jimmy call i would imagine as the commissioning department uh i would have had no reason to

02:07:33 uh i would have had no reason to challenge that because i would have taken that as you know particularly the level of detail in that update it's been you know completed published you know that conveys that you know we're almost there obviously that's the start of the

02:07:44 there obviously that's the start of the training process but the actual process of getting that training developed is is pretty much concluded um

02:07:52 um so yeah i was i'm surprised both by the content of the packages doesn't really reflect that update or what the intended uh

02:08:02 uh package was designed as far as i understood to to cover and i'm also slightly surprised or you know surprised that the sign off date is you know after

02:08:13 that the sign off date is you know after i've retired yes yes and in light of that answer would you accept that the

02:08:20 the telling the latter house working group that the package had been completed and published was misleading because it would cause them to believe that the package was effectively in operation and had been rolled out to staff when it had not

02:08:32 been rolled out to staff when it had not been i i agree with that yes now um

02:08:37 now um peter groves told us that the i.t issues were with videos not loading properly because of poor bandwidth and that resulted in a number of of training packages not being released to lfb staff

02:08:49 packages not being released to lfb staff um he gave evidence just for our reference purposes it's day 177 page 178 at lines 14-19 that he'd reported that to his line manager and that that was a topic of repeated discussion at the

02:09:01 topic of repeated discussion at the performance and commissioning board meeting

02:09:05 meeting were you aware of that at this time yes i think refer to my earlier answer that certainly the embedded video uh packages that had an embedded video were not always working consistently across

02:09:17 not always working consistently across the whole of the uh london fire brigade estate the fire stations and other locations um and and that's why james douglas was tasked with trying to come up with the head of it a

02:09:29 trying to come up with the head of it a interim solution prior to the roll out of the new wide area wet network which would obviously increase the bandwidth to station so i was aware in the context of a wider issue but i

02:09:40 in the context of a wider issue but i was not ever aware that this particular package

02:09:44 package was one of the packages that was struggling because from what you've shown me and i'm not familiar with the package it didn't look like it had embedded video and it shouldn't have been one of the packages that was causing problems well i was going to ask you that exact question i think although

02:09:56 you that exact question i think although the station the senior officer video did have a video embedded in it or perhaps functionality with a rollover we've seen the um

02:10:05 the um station-based officer training did not so given that that is the case and there's no video or functionality uh in that can you explain why that wasn't rolled out at least to station-based

02:10:16 rolled out at least to station-based stuff because i t issues wouldn't be a problem yeah i would agree with that from what you've said if there is no embedded video then that shouldn't be an issue and even the senior officer package the vast majority of senior

02:10:27 package the vast majority of senior officers do work at headquarters or can come into headquarters to undertake training if they need uh better performance on the on the desktop as we call it the you know pc on the desk um so i've got

02:10:40 desk um so i've got no

02:10:41 no answer for you why that wasn't rolled out right

02:10:44 out right now um

02:10:46 now um i think i take from your answer that your director was aware of the of the i.t problem and its effect on the training package or packages as early as march 2014 yes yes

02:10:57 march 2014 yes yes um

02:10:58 um and

02:11:00 and can you explain why that wasn't brought to the attention of the latin house working group

02:11:07 group well i didn't know obviously in the update it looked like we had completed this i wasn't aware if there was any other rule 43 solutions that had training packs which i believe they are the policy no 800 had

02:11:19 i believe they are the policy no 800 had a training pack um

02:11:22 um i wasn't aware that any of the the training packages associated with the rule 43s

02:11:27 rule 43s were having difficulties because of the it infrastructure and i would have expected if if that had been the case that someone would put it in the rule 43 update so that we could

02:11:38 in the rule 43 update so that we could have

02:11:38 have raised that with members so somebody wasn't reporting to you completely and fully were they uh not apparently if the reason why this didn't

02:11:48 didn't get rolled out to use the term is because of that i.t issue which doesn't look like that is the reason from what we've discussed i would have expected yes that to be

02:11:59 i would have expected yes that to be reflected in the update now the simple work around for this problem would have been to tell babcock to remove whatever offending video there was

02:12:09 was uh and proceed with the rest of the training package um

02:12:13 um for this particular item if if it was the video uh and i don't know the answer to that that was the problem yes that would have been one potential solution yes or perhaps send a cd to the stations uh yeah there was there's probably a

02:12:25 uh yeah there was there's probably a raft of alternative solutions that we could have looked at um but uh

02:12:30 but uh probably james douglas would be the best person because he would be the person that had the conversation with the head of i.t right about this issue

02:12:39 issue to your knowledge were those discussions ever had

02:12:42 ever had to look at an alternative i

02:12:45 i recall from a odcb report because i think it was raised at odcb around the time you said march if that helps with your document referencing

02:12:56 referencing the march odcb 2014 i think was where it was first raised at that board uh mr douglas was given the task to speak to the head of it to see if there

02:13:08 speak to the head of it to see if there was anything that they could do i from memory uh obviously we tracked all the actions from odcb we ended up with a great long table of actions so we didn't lose track of things

02:13:20 didn't lose track of things and they only got taken off once they've been closed um

02:13:24 um there was an a number of it patches i recall uh don't ask me what an it patch is it something to do with the technology for the station end equipment uh which was designed to try and overcome the

02:13:36 was designed to try and overcome the performance issues i believe one of those patches was rolled out prior to my retirement but it didn't serve to fix the problem at the fire stations it improved performance at

02:13:47 stations it improved performance at other locations but the fire station seemed to be the problem and i believe and i haven't got any documentary evidence for this it's just from memory that the head of it then committed to

02:14:00 that the head of it then committed to develop a second patch as i think as it was referred to to try and fix the fire station end as an interim solution prior to the wide area network being upgraded in 2015 but

02:14:13 area network being upgraded in 2015 but i i haven't got any evidence and i can't remember whether that was completed and successful before i retired i don't believe it was right um now just

02:14:23 now just to pin this down to a document you referred to the odcb meeting in march 2014 let's just um look at that can we go please to lfb3040602

02:14:40 um and this is the odcb june 2014 meeting minutes if we go to page one you can see

02:14:48 can see uh that in fact you were not present you gave apologies for absence okay you see that yeah but but let's go to page three

02:14:59 uh under the penultimate item on that page 10th march 2014 it says this babcock training packages and use of video h o hrd

02:15:10 packages and use of video h o hrd to confirm that arrangements for use of video and training packages fully exploit the terminal functionality of fire stations and then the update is ict need to improve links to stations for

02:15:22 need to improve links to stations for video as there is inconsistency in performance there is no budget for improvements and may have to wait until wa on wan upgrade in december 2015 hoict

02:15:34 wa on wan upgrade in december 2015 hoict looking at interim solutions that is that what you were referring to that's exactly what i was referring to thank you for that yes now just just on the question of the budget there you say no budget for improvements

02:15:47 no budget for improvements first did you read these minutes when they were produced after the meeting even though you went to the meeting yes i would have read these yes um was there any discussion at odcb

02:15:58 um was there any discussion at odcb level or lower down in the organization about finding the money for right for it improvements so that this training program could be rolled out swiftly

02:16:10 swiftly i can't remember a meeting or a report that discussed that particular issue no not when i was working right can you explain why there was no budget for improvements given the importance of this training package

02:16:22 importance of this training package which itself was anchored into the latino house rule 43 recommendation response

02:16:28 response well i set i expect that that update in terms of the the line that starts there is no budget would have come from the head of i.t so he would have been expressing that within his

02:16:39 expressing that within his department that there wasn't a budget other than that which was already committed to the wide area network um i think if we'd have discussed this and and we'd wanted to do

02:16:51 discussed this and and we'd wanted to do this if there was a if there is in fact a technical solution i'm not a technical person so i don't know if there was a a way of improving the performance without upgrading the wan i don't think budget would have been a

02:17:03 i don't think budget would have been a something that would have precluded us considering taking that forward although the budget was obviously difficult during

02:17:08 during that period as you probably are aware but um

02:17:11 but um certainly for things like training we would we would have found the money from somewhere

02:17:17 i mean some people looking at this might think that budgetary constraints explain the lack of speed in rolling this training out to station-based staff

02:17:29 to station-based staff i mean that's uh is that a fair conclusion it's a conclusion but i don't think it's the reality i i i never experienced uh with regards to training and and things

02:17:40 with regards to training and and things that involve frontline service delivery that we would compromise uh unless it was like a ridiculous amount of money but for things like this and i haven't got any sense of what the cost of

02:17:52 got any sense of what the cost of upgrading the when was but um it wouldn't have prevented us from

02:17:59 from spending money on this if if that was a viable solution so yes the fire authority

02:18:04 authority was

02:18:06 was you know in difficult you know we had a difficult budget between 2013 and 16 as you were which resulted in closure of 10 fire stations and a lot of other efficiency savings

02:18:17 other efficiency savings but

02:18:18 but we never discussed that we couldn't afford to do something like this and i don't think that would have been budget wouldn't have been a preventative issue in this context if we'd had that discussion

02:18:29 discussion was the difficult budget between 2013 and 2016

02:18:33 and 2016 any explanation at all for the

02:18:36 for the defects and and delays in the wrote in the addressing of the rule 43 recommendations from the lack of house coroner oh i don't think so no uh now can i then ask you about airwave

02:18:49 uh now can i then ask you about airwave radios so far we've focused on uhf we touched on airwaves before

02:18:56 and we focused also on barry but is it right that the lfe also uses digital airwave radios and supplies them to officers on the fire ground yes they're they're issued to station managers and above operational staff yes and that's

02:19:08 above operational staff yes and that's also called the main scheme radio isn't it yes it's the same technology yes it's the means i think by which the fire ground can communicate with the control room

02:19:16 room and with other emergency services it is indeed

02:19:19 indeed and we as we understand it airwave radios were were before the grenfell tower fires you say reserved for senior station staff station manager and higher ranks yes yes um

02:19:32 we heard evidence of phase one that airwave radios were where they were available used in place of uhf weight radios and that they were far superior somebody described them i think it was mr um it was um brian o'keefe as far

02:19:45 mr um it was um brian o'keefe as far superior to uhf radios was that your own experience um there are completely different technologies so uhf is ultra high analog

02:19:56 technologies so uhf is ultra high analog uh ultra high frequency analog and airwave is digital technology so there was

02:20:04 there was uh airwaves a national radio

02:20:07 radio solution for blue lights and other agencies

02:20:10 agencies and i believe the contract has something like 99.9

02:20:15 like 99.9 coverage and particularly in london uh which was a requirement for the metropolitan police so it's highly resilient in terms of its coverage and obviously it's a digital trunked

02:20:26 and obviously it's a digital trunked radio system so it doesn't suffer some of the issues that you experience with analog radio signals no um let's then go back

02:20:36 back i think now for the final time to the rule 43 pro former lfb

02:20:43 lfb zero six 3034062

02:20:44 page ten

02:20:52 uh and on that page we can see in

02:20:56 in the um

02:20:59 the um bullet point at the the last bullet point in the that block of text explore the use of digital airwave radios to provide additional command channels should communications difficulties be encountered at a

02:21:11 difficulties be encountered at a specific incident and if you if you go please uh to

02:21:21 the top box

02:21:23 box halfway down it says this use of airwave digital radios currently these radios issued to all flexible duty officers are used primarily for communications between the incident ground and the brigades mobilizing control expanding

02:21:35 brigades mobilizing control expanding the use of digital radio talk groups for example for the incident command team would provide the opportunity to free up analog radio channels this does however bring another level of complexity in managing information plays at an

02:21:46 managing information plays at an incident

02:21:47 incident and then i've read you what's next to d the final bullet there explore the use of digital airwave radios as with other topics which we've identified in this pro forma together

02:21:58 identified in this pro forma together during your evidence this suggestion was never mentioned in the lfb's response to the rule 43 letter was it no it wasn't why was that i don't know i i would imagine that and

02:22:09 i don't know i i would imagine that and certainly my expectation this would have been picked up in the wider training solution that we did commit to the coroner that we would do and i know airwave is one of the equipment items that you showed me in

02:22:21 equipment items that you showed me in the package but yeah i would have expected this to feature quite significantly in that new training provision what became of the lfb's exploration of

02:22:33 what became of the lfb's exploration of that issue as proposed in this document um

02:22:38 um well i wouldn't have been involved in the research obviously i know how the radios worked i had one myself um and i would have expected that the use of digital radios

02:22:49 expected that the use of digital radios as an alternative to uhf radios in certain circumstances would have featured in that training so but i can't answer why it doesn't feature more heavily in the training solution because

02:23:01 heavily in the training solution because i didn't see that solution now let's look at the minutes of the odcb meeting on the 6th of may 2010 so this is three years

02:23:12 three years before

02:23:15 it's at lfb 30406

02:23:25 and you can see there from page one who was present rita dexter is in the chair and you are there

02:23:34 there as ac oep you see that yes um if we go to page three please we can see any other business under paragraph

02:23:45 paragraph oops

02:23:46 oops seems to have disappeared hum there it is um this is under any other business action ac stroke op to consider options for use of main scheme airwave radios by borough

02:23:58 of main scheme airwave radios by borough commanders monitoring incidents you see that yes and if you go um

02:24:12 to back to the bottom of page two you can see what this follows on from

02:24:19 at paragraph 9.1 use of main scheme airwave radios ac stroke op advised that the use of main scheme airwave radios by borough commanders in order to monitor incidents had been increasing and there

02:24:30 incidents had been increasing and there was a likelihood of the brigade being billed for usage as we are close to the limit as a result he'd sent out a message advising officers to only use when necessary there were discussions regarding the pros and cons of such

02:24:41 regarding the pros and cons of such usage and the suggestion was that some officers should be using the mobis system instead of the a instead acop to consider options um now

02:24:53 there's a mention there of billing for usage

02:24:57 usage did that cost consideration or the cost of additional airwave handsets more generally play any part in the brigade's decision not not to take the suggestion of use of airwaves

02:25:08 take the suggestion of use of airwaves further forward come april may 2013 three years later i i don't believe so and if with your indulgence there's a little bit of context to this which really might help

02:25:20 context to this which really might help the inquiry yes please so um this issue i remember this issue so

02:25:27 so when you're paged to remotely monitor an incident

02:25:30 incident we provided the mobis system as it's there which is an application on a desktop so you could log on to the incident and you're seeing information that's being generated by the control centers you're seeing the

02:25:42 the control centers you're seeing the messages that are coming back you're seeing people that are being mobilized et cetera so you're remotely monitoring what started to happen around this period bearing in mind airwave was only introduced in london foreign i think i

02:25:53 introduced in london foreign i think i said 2009 from memory that people were leaving their airwave radio switched on just because they're interested in what's going on anywhere in london because it's a trunk

02:26:04 anywhere in london because it's a trunk radio system you can hear the whole the whole of london fire brigade uh and clearly the officers if there's an incident in biggin hill those are familiar with the geography of london is in south london

02:26:15 in south london there could be an incident in barnet which is the diametrically opposite and what was happening everyone who had their airwave radio and was lighting up what's called the base stations

02:26:25 stations and we were being built for the number of times in terms of capacity that we were lighting up those base stations so when the contract was set up with london fire brigade my understanding that we pitched ourselves

02:26:37 understanding that we pitched ourselves in a band of usage which then attracted a cost

02:26:41 a cost and we were very close to that limit because everyone was leaving their radio switched on so it was having no performance improvement it was just people being curious about what was going on and so this was intended to say

02:26:53 going on and so this was intended to say if your page for an incident and that's how we were notified at senior manager level we had pages you should initially use the mobis system because that gives you all the information that's coming across the

02:27:05 information that's coming across the radio

02:27:06 radio and other people that are not associated with that incident should not just switched on because they're interested in the incident because it's actually going to cost the brigade money and actually actually delivering no

02:27:17 actually actually delivering no performance improvement at all right so that that's the i don't know if that helps it it's it's a slightly different issue than just the use of radios we're not saying don't use your radio it's just it was being used inappropriately i

02:27:28 just it was being used inappropriately i suppose

02:27:29 suppose come 2013 was that a a consideration when it came to exploring the use of airwave radios as per the bullet point in the rule 43 draft recommendation response we've seen no i don't believe

02:27:41 response we've seen no i don't believe it was

02:27:43 it was um

02:27:44 um now the we understand that the lfb had access to some 70 airwave talk groups which are i think am i right akin to channels yes yes yeah and they only ever

02:27:55 channels yes yes yeah and they only ever used a handful of those talk groups with any regularity is that right is that that is correct yes is it right that the lfb can actually create or adopt talk groups for specific incidents or exercises yes you

02:28:07 specific incidents or exercises yes you can create a talk group at an incident yes we did follow from that then that an airwave channel could actually be used to set up a change of chain of command at a at an incident such as grenfell tower yes it could

02:28:18 tower yes it could and that would then free up capacity on the uhf radio frequency yes all the officers that moved across to the airwave would obviously not be using their analog radio so that would free up capacity yes i mean

02:28:30 capacity yes i mean would that solution have been in keeping with the

02:28:32 with the the tenor of the coroner's rule 43 recommendation on additional radio capacity yes it would what consideration did your director give to adopting that suggestion

02:28:43 give to adopting that suggestion um

02:28:45 um my understanding was airwave was covered in that training not clearly it's not covered in that level of detail which is disappointing for me

02:28:54 officers did use airwave radio i've used them at very large incidents so it wasn't that no one used the idea and weren't aware of talk groups that that was all part of the training when the when the airwave system was rolled out

02:29:06 when the airwave system was rolled out in 2009 and that was explained to us how to set up a talk group how to switch channels

02:29:11 channels it was also in policy guidance some of the policy guidance that was updated following lachenal predominantly policy note 790 which was the fire survival guidance

02:29:23 the fire survival guidance note that was redrafted in response to the experience at la canal and it clearly says in that particular policy guidance that officers should consider using main

02:29:34 officers should consider using main scheme airwave radio when passing information relating to fire survival calls

02:29:42 calls subject to capacity in control to set up an

02:29:45 an additional main scheme radio channel i think it's also touched on in policy note 633 but doesn't go into so much detail but it does say you know you can use main scheme

02:29:56 use main scheme uh airwave radio to facilitate communication between the incident command command unit and the bridgehead yes but i'm i'm really asking you about sorry more wholesale

02:30:09 you about sorry more wholesale wholesale

02:30:10 wholesale um

02:30:12 um establishment of a chain of command at the major incident yes you can put you can put anyone once you set the talk group up you can then when you're briefing officers that are arriving at the incident to do specific command or functional role capacity

02:30:25 command or functional role capacity roles um

02:30:26 roles um you can you can tell them to switch their mainstream radio onto a particular channel and then they'll be in communication with you right now in fact

02:30:34 in fact let's focus on what happened in january 2013 on this topic um can we go to lfb 3050197

02:30:43 this is an email chain of january 2013 so

02:30:47 so during the inquest evidence but before the rule 43 recommendations came out in the march of that year and the subject matter here is is as you can see fire survival calls

02:30:59 survival calls now um if you go uh to um the email chain if you look at uh

02:31:08 uh the email from graeme ellis to neil withers and danielle cotton um in the second paragraph um

02:31:16 um graeme ellis says and you're not copied into this i i accept but let's see what you say he says i still think that we must ensure that the next generation of fire ground radios may present an opportunity to link into a main scheme

02:31:27 opportunity to link into a main scheme dedicated fsg talk channel las have handheld radios that they can use to communicate locally as well as on main schemes

02:31:35 schemes given that those three senior officers graham ellis neil withers and danny cotton uh reported to you at that time i think january 13th they did yes well you were

02:31:46 january 13th they did yes well you were made aware of the suggestion made by mr ellis here the ac ellis not specifically but i think the context of this email because of the reference to john anthony in the first sentence

02:31:59 to john anthony in the first sentence um just for might help the inquiry john anthony was a former assistant commissioner with the london fire brigade who was seconded on to the national

02:32:08 national radio project which was the project designed

02:32:11 designed to deliver a replacement for the airwave radio scheme which is a national trunk radio system and i suspect graham's reference there is that we need to

02:32:22 to obviously liaise with john who was representing not just london foreign i think he was representing fire services uh

02:32:29 uh within the region uh around the user specification for that replacement airwave system which from memory it was originally designed to be delivered and it's a government-led project it's not a local

02:32:40 government-led project it's not a local foreign fire service project was scheduled to be delivered in in the fiscal year 1516 2015-16 but as i understand it as of today it still

02:32:52 as i understand it as of today it still hasn't been delivered right was any consideration given to procuring this kind of dual purpose radio uh after the lachlan house inquest so after march 2013 uh no there wasn't why

02:33:04 after march 2013 uh no there wasn't why is that um i think uh obviously you've we've touched on the project that was in the ops

02:33:15 ops department's departmental plan which was looking at barry radios as i said i think that has developed into a replacement radio project more widely and we would have

02:33:26 project more widely and we would have been aware that the airwave radio was already programmed for a major upgrade in 2015 2015-16 and i say that is part of a national system that we're part of

02:33:37 of a national system that we're part of a national system so there wasn't alternative national radio systems at that time airwave was the national radio system for the emergency services so i'm not sure if we even if

02:33:48 services so i'm not sure if we even if we'd had gone to the market there was an alternative solution to what we already had

02:33:53 had i can't say that for sure but that that's my understanding which is why i think the government projects has run into so many difficulties because there isn't a lot of solutions in the market right i mean it looks from this email that the las the london ambulance

02:34:05 that the las the london ambulance services already had handheld radios that they could use it at incidents to communicate locally um

02:34:12 um why wasn't consideration given at that very time particularly particularly after the rule 43 recommendations have come from the coroner to do the same as the london ambulance service

02:34:23 ambulance service well they do a slightly different role to us but i accept the point you're making

02:34:27 making london ambulance service i believe are airwave users and i think they only use airwave radios i may be wrong but that's my understanding and we did have the capacity to use airwave as we've already discussed this

02:34:39 airwave as we've already discussed this morning

02:34:40 morning and it was my understanding that the senior officer communications training package responding to the rule 43 would have developed that opportunity and that capacity

02:34:52 capacity to to a greater degree than we've been using that system before but clearly it didn't develop that forward no my question is why not i i can't answer that because i didn't see that package

02:35:03 that because i didn't see that package if i had seen that package when i was working that would have certainly been raised by me and and we'd been investigating why it hadn't achieved what my understanding it was originally designed to achieve right

02:35:14 designed to achieve right now i want to turn to another topic which is or sub-topic which is poli lfb policy and guidance on whole-scale communication failures we've already looked in some detail at specific aspects

02:35:26 specific aspects of the lfb's communications setup as well as as well as the lfb's response to the lack of housing quests coroner's recommendations i want to ask you now about the general approach of the

02:35:37 about the general approach of the brigade

02:35:39 brigade and policy about communications on the incident ground um can we turn please first lfb triple zero eight one sorry eight nine one three nine

02:35:50 sorry eight nine one three nine this is policy number four eight eight on incident communications

02:35:57 uh you can see that it was issued on the 30th of january 2007 and reviewed as current on the 25th of may 2016 so after your time if we go to paragraph 1.1 on

02:36:08 your time if we go to paragraph 1.1 on page 2

02:36:09 page 2 you can see that it says introduction effective communications are the key to success a reliable communications network is essential for safe offering safe operation at incidents and

02:36:20 safe operation at incidents and fundamental for securing the level of command required to manage operational resources efficiently this policy procedure aims to standardize simplify and improve the setting up of

02:36:31 and improve the setting up of communications network at an incident uh

02:36:36 uh i mean first of all can i take it that you would agree with what is stated in the first sentence absolutely yes and second sentence yes yes uh do you agree that communications problems are likely to

02:36:48 communications problems are likely to occur uh or certainly at significant risk of occurring at larger or major incidents such as lack of house or indeed grenfell yes it's more likely that the larger

02:36:59 yes it's more likely that the larger more complex incidents yes yes and would it be fair to say that the amount of personnel and radio traffic at major incidents plays a role in the likelihood of communications problems arising at incidents of that kind yes i'd agree

02:37:10 incidents of that kind yes i'd agree with that

02:37:14 and it would follow i think also from that that it is at such incidents that communication across incident sectors would be particularly important yes indeed yeah now let's look at um lfb

02:37:27 indeed yeah now let's look at um lfb double zero one zero five four three six what i'm showing you is dac dominic ellis's second witness statement to the inquiry of the 6th of

02:37:38 statement to the inquiry of the 6th of march 2020. there's the first page can we go to page 4 please paragraph 13.

02:37:56 he says this

02:37:59 uh in response to question five of the request there are no policies which deal specifically and exclusively with communications failures i highlight below where a policy note refers to communications challenges which may

02:38:10 communications challenges which may arise in a particular operational context the lfb's future intention is to provide clearer guidance and training on steps which ought to be taken if communications issues are experienced

02:38:21 communications issues are experienced i'm currently not able to say at this juncture if that information will be generally in context or equipment specific

02:38:28 specific now i just want to focus on the word future there given that this this statement is dated march 2020 uh and therefore um

02:38:39 uh and therefore um very recently or relatively recently do you accept that during your tenure as dort

02:38:46 dort although policy 488 as we've seen it emphasized the importance of effective communications particularly at major incidents

02:38:55 incidents that you've accepted it doesn't offer crews any guidance on how to ensure the communications are and remain effective

02:39:04 i think there are elements of guidance in breeding operators policy and training relating to specific communications failures for ba crews

02:39:15 for ba crews because it's linked to emergency procedures but i accept that for fire ground radio and indeed airwave if we include that as a

02:39:24 a capability the training pack that was designed in response to the coroner's rule 43 was in my opinion and my understanding was going to deal with this particular

02:39:36 was going to deal with this particular issue and give officers and crews further guidance and clarification on what they should do and what options they had available to them if they experienced communication difficulty and

02:39:48 experienced communication difficulty and clearly from what you've shown me that package did not do that yeah the ba policy and training related to specific communications for ba is one thing i'm asking about policy 488 yes you accept

02:39:59 asking about policy 488 yes you accept there's nothing in there no no and nor anything in there about how to restore communications at an incident in the event that they're lost as indeed they were at lachnal and grenfell no

02:40:11 grenfell no now the evidence we've looked at today um

02:40:15 um would you accept shows that the lfb was aware of the limitations of its communications equipment and problems were common

02:40:25 i think we were alive to the fact that the equipment we had in place at that time you know like all communications even digital radio has its limitations mobile phones have their limitations i think we

02:40:37 phones have their limitations i think we were aware of those limitations we had procured before my time as director but since the rollout of the more modern uhf radios we'd

02:40:50 more modern uhf radios we'd procured

02:40:51 procured leaky feeder

02:40:54 repeaters both u8s and subsequently digital repeaters for the v8 telemetry boards um so yes we were aware

02:41:06 so yes we were aware what was the second part of the question sorry missed a minute uh well

02:41:10 uh well awareness that problems of communications at large were common limitations problems your word but there were limitations like your equipment there is a limitation on the equipment yes we

02:41:22 a limitation on the equipment yes we were aware the limitations of the equipment yes and and can we take it that your directorate didn't take any steps at any stage to provide an overarching communications policy or guidance on communications for

02:41:33 policy or guidance on communications for operational crews so that they would be equipped to deal with communications problems on the incident ground beyond what i've said about the intention of the two case studies or

02:41:44 intention of the two case studies or training packs in response to the coroner's rule 43 no we didn't no and why was that um

02:41:53 i believe because when i was director of the latino house post incident period was focused and obviously commerce was one of the key issues

02:42:02 issues that i believe personally that if we delivered a high quality training package

02:42:08 package in response to that rule 43 that we would have be addressing the issues that you've just described in terms of there was a lack of specific policy guidance for cruz

02:42:20 for cruz to know what to do in the event of communication failure yes why wasn't that done after the latin house fire or specifically after the rule 43 in response to it

02:42:31 rule 43 in response to it that's the first time i've seen the content of that training so i you know i'm disappointed but i can't answer that i'm afraid thank you now we've also seen that the lfb had also seen the rule 43

02:42:43 that the lfb had also seen the rule 43 recommendations relating to the shirley towers fire uh in april 2010 report of april 2013. yes and we've seen that that was circulated i think within the operational procedures department

02:42:55 operational procedures department uh in october 2012. yes um

02:43:00 yes um just to be clear let me show you a document make that good lfb double zero one double zero three zero six

02:43:10 uh this is an email um

02:43:16 from peter come up to jimmy court and others including andy rowe and james knighton 8th of october 2012 draft ap ap for matters arising from

02:43:29 draft ap ap for matters arising from shirley towers that's the subject matter and

02:43:33 and it it says um dear all please see email below and attached draft action plan for op

02:43:39 op regarding issues arising from the shirley towers incident which occurred in southampton in april 2010 and below that you can see there's an email from peter carrup to you and danny cotton and dr bevan

02:43:52 which i think we saw before yep uh attaching the first draft initial first draft review uh

02:43:59 uh if we go to that it's lfb double zero one double zero three zero seven

02:44:11 no there's a draft action plan we have to open it up if we go to the native

02:44:21 this may take a second or two

02:44:44 bear with me these documents take a little time to load

02:45:06 excuse me

02:45:11 no thank you now if we scroll down please to row 49 uh i'm going to just if you're familiar with this document because you were part of the email chain we saw would that be

02:45:22 of the email chain we saw would that be fair um

02:45:25 fair um well familiar as you can be given the lapse of time yes

02:45:30 yes if we go down to row 49 item 23 ops procedures review definition of prolonged radio communication breakdown in relevant

02:45:41 communication breakdown in relevant procedures training materials etc and then in column d gm a court lead officer you see that yes i say that what work was done can you tell us in relation to that action point

02:45:54 relation to that action point um

02:45:55 um i i don't know to be honest um you don't know what i mean do you know why you don't know well jim mccourt didn't report directly to me he would have reported to a deputy

02:46:06 to me he would have reported to a deputy assistant commissioner who then would have reported to the head of service who that that person would have reported to me so

02:46:13 me so um

02:46:14 um i don't think i'd have seen a detailed response to this even if there is one right looking at more at it more widely during your tenure as director of operational

02:46:25 your tenure as director of operational resilience and training to what extent if at all did the lfb seek to learn lessons from communications incidents beyond fire and rescue services for example terrorist attacks

02:46:36 example terrorist attacks in the uk and abroad

02:46:40 i'll take that in two parts so the international issue uh london fire brigade did not have any processes procedures or governance in place to learn from international events

02:46:52 place to learn from international events irrespective whether it's communication or fires or whatever we would rely on a government lead department or possibly seafarer chief fire and rescue officers association to

02:47:04 officers association to provide guidance uh or to raise issues with

02:47:07 with individual fire and rescue services that was typically how the international context was relayed to brigades in terms of uk based incidents

02:47:19 of uk based incidents again

02:47:20 again a bit like shirley towers if if there was reports available um we would typically uh i suspect we would have got people to read them who it was sort of

02:47:31 people to read them who it was sort of covering those areas of responsibility within our service and then if issues needed to come forward a bit like this one there would be a kind of a proposed action plan with

02:47:42 be a kind of a proposed action plan with lead officers allocated and then we'd have expected that work to be progressed right you said in the start of that last answer that

02:47:53 the start of that last answer that uh the lfb had no processes procedural governance in place to learn from international events irrespective of whether it's communication or fires why is that why why so insular mr reason

02:48:07 why is that why why so insular mr reason um

02:48:11 i think

02:48:14 the difficulty with international fires is

02:48:17 is one obviously we don't always get notified if they're not on the news there is no mechanism i don't think unless government tell us uh that they've happened that's the first point the the second point

02:48:28 the the second point which is a real issue is

02:48:30 issue is the regulatory regimes in place in a in a foreign country or a different country in terms of the built environment may be very different to the uh

02:48:41 very different to the uh environment you know the legislative environment in the uk and also

02:48:45 and also the way fire and rescue services respond both in terms of their capability and their policies may not align to sort of uk fire and rescue service

02:48:58 sort of uk fire and rescue service national doctrine so whilst i'm not saying there isn't any opportunity to learn from international fires it wasn't something that we did in my time and i don't even think

02:49:10 did in my time and i don't even think they do it now as i understand it to what extent if at all did the lfb seek to learn lessons from other risk critical industries in the uk

02:49:22 industries in the uk um i don't think we did and again why is that again probably context i'm not saying there isn't any lessons to learn and probably capacity really um

02:49:34 to learn and probably capacity really um you know we're a big organization but we haven't got uh limitless resources and as you can see i think you can see from all the work we do there's a lot going on it's a complex

02:49:45 there's a lot going on it's a complex large organization and

02:49:49 and we probably wouldn't have the capacity even if we wanted to unless we were going to take a policy direction corporately to to start looking at other organizations i don't think it was something that we ever considered

02:50:00 something that we ever considered actively during my time um and that's about as best as i can give and

02:50:08 and finally to what extent if at all did the lfe give consideration to other governmental or national guidance documents when when formulating its communications infrastructure and policies

02:50:20 infrastructure and policies uh if there was national guidance uh as we've touched on things like intrinsic safety we would be we'd be minded to be guided by

02:50:29 guided by uh what the industry you know fire service industry or government departments are putting out as guidance we'd be minded to

02:50:37 minded to stick within those guidelines um but again not not looking at other industries to use this example communications infrastructure obviously we work closely with other blue light responders and in

02:50:49 with other blue light responders and in london they predominantly use airwave radio which we did obviously have capability and access to now i have some final questions for you mr reason um

02:51:00 mr reason um on or as at the 14th of june 2017 you had left the lfb some two and a half years earlier yes when you first heard the news and you saw the images of the fire

02:51:10 fire what was your immediate reaction

02:51:14 uh just to give it context i i was woken up to be told there was a major fire in london um

02:51:20 london um and i put the television on and i saw those awful pictures and i was just shocked that that could happen

02:51:30 happen in london but in the uk fire and rescue service

02:51:33 service and i just could not imagine how that fire had occurred and how significant it had become and obviously i didn't know then about the rapid fire spread but just looking at the images

02:51:45 spread but just looking at the images and this would have been about uh 5 30

02:51:48 uh 5 30 uh you know in the morning of the morning that the fire started uh it was truly shocking and it still shocks me now did you ask yourself in that moment what might have gone wrong yes of course i you know

02:52:00 yes of course i you know in preparing for this i've done a huge amount of work for this because i care and uh

02:52:06 and uh you know of course that immediately my first thought is you know i mean this is going to be really bad for the families and people that are in that tower possibly there could be firefighter fatalities in fact that

02:52:18 firefighter fatalities in fact that i thought that had happened because of the sort of ticker tape update at the bottom said brigade's confirmed fatalities and i i assumed it would be casualties in the tower but also maybe firefighters so that was shocking

02:52:30 that was shocking um

02:52:31 um but yeah the whole of course it you you question yourself you know what have i done as a professional fire officer how would i dealt with that incident and obviously i only could see the images i didn't know the story at that point

02:52:43 i didn't know the story at that point but of course as a professional fire officer it never leaves you that sense of duty and commitment and responsibility that for the level i held in the organization of course you know i did start to think

02:52:55 course you know i did start to think you know should we have known about that uh i didn't think that immediately because i didn't know the context uh you know like cladding and rain screen cladding and all the things that have come out subsequently but

02:53:06 come out subsequently but yeah it never leaves you as a professional fire officer did you think to yourself that this was a one-off fire that was completely unpredicted and for which the lfb could never reasonably be prepared

02:53:18 never reasonably be prepared i i don't think i felt that straight away but certainly you know you know i went back to assist the london fire gate with this internal investigation but once i started to understand a little bit more about you know what had

02:53:29 bit more about you know what had happened and the sequence of events i could have never imagined i can repeat what i said before i could have never imagined a fire on that scale and then understanding how the building

02:53:41 and then understanding how the building by the time i'd seen it you know at 5 30 in the morning how it managed to look like that and how it'd be so catastrophically damaged by fire i i don't think in my whole professional

02:53:52 i don't think in my whole professional career not just when i was director i could have imagined that a fire on that scale

02:53:57 scale with that tragic outcomes could have happened in the uk did you look back on your own time as director of operations resilience and training and ask yourself what you could have done in that position

02:54:09 have done in that position better to prepare the lfb for a response to the grenfell tower fire absolutely i mean you know the scale of the tragedy is just off you know on a different level than i've ever

02:54:20 know on a different level than i've ever experienced and of course you ask yourself those questions because we all do this job because we care and we want to make a difference and you know

02:54:30 you know i've been very hard in scrutinizing my performance both assistant commissioner and director but i honestly you know i'm not complacent and i'm i'm

02:54:41 you know i'm not complacent and i'm i'm certainly not being intensive to the families but i just could never have imagined a fire in that scout and answering the question you say you did ask yourself are you able to identify anything that you could and or

02:54:52 identify anything that you could and or should have done which almost two and a half years on would have better equipped the incident commander at grenfell tower with the benefit of hindsight you're always going to do

02:55:03 always going to do things you always learn from every incident that i've ever been to of you know of any reasonable scale i can honestly say there's always things to learn but is there one thing that i think i could

02:55:15 is there one thing that i think i could have done

02:55:17 have done i honestly don't think anyone in the british fire service at that point in 2017 could have you know dealt with a fire on that scale

02:55:31 well uh mr reason thank you those are all the questions i have for you uh at this point there may be others that those uh who are assisting me have and others uh watching may have for you

02:55:42 and others uh watching may have for you so i'm going to ask the chairman now to take the usual end of questions break yes uh before we come back well as you probably know mr reason when we when council gets to the end of his prepared questions we always have a

02:55:55 prepared questions we always have a a break

02:55:56 a break both to give him a chance to ensure that he hasn't overlooked anything and also to give others who are following these proceedings from elsewhere a chance to suggest questions that perhaps ought to be put to you arising out of your evidence so we'll

02:56:09 arising out of your evidence so we'll break now until ten to one i think okay and uh we'll come back at ten to one and see if there are any more questions for you then thank you and in the meantime of course please don't talk to anyone about your

02:56:20 please don't talk to anyone about your evidence absolutely right thank you very much would you give the usher then please

02:56:36 thank you ten to one then mr militia thank you

03:09:17 yes would you ask us to reason to come back in please

03:09:28 right that's the reason well we'll now see what the position is on further questions yes thank you yes mr chairman um we've had something of a flush of uh of questions for mr reason which um to be fair to him

03:09:39 be fair to him uh i think it's appropriate that we go and consider a little bit more maturely um given that we don't have a witness this afternoon you know we're not going to be starting um

03:09:49 um ac daily until tomorrow morning uh it would probably be better if i was to ask you to rise now until two o'clock if that's not inconvenient uh to mr reason and then deal with those further

03:10:00 and then deal with those further questions at two o'clock well uh this reason i hope you didn't have anything planned for the early afternoon i don't know

03:10:07 know i thought you probably hadn't so it sounds to me as though it would be much more satisfactory if we took just a little bit longer than we might normally expect to to deal with the additional questions now mr minute um

03:10:19 questions now mr minute um i know you're very happy to work over lunch but you do need time to get some lunch as well as to others so um is

03:10:27 so um is the ten minutes that you were going to get between nine and one o'clock enough or would you like to resume a little later than usual say 2 15. no 2 o'clock is fine you're sure yes i'm going to do two things at once

03:10:39 i'm going to do two things at once for once right well there we are mr reason we'll we'll break now i'm sorry we're going to keep you hanging on okay on this basis but i don't think there's really any sensible alternatives so

03:10:50 alternatives so we'll rise now we'll resume at two o'clock and then we'll see how the land lies all right thank you thank you very much

03:11:05 right mr miller well um there it is we'll we'll sit at two o'clock unless you send

03:11:10 you send us a message that you do like uh would like to have some more time that's very good mr chairman if you do i'll let you know you'll be very amenable to that request thank you very much good all right thank you very much

03:11:21 much good all right thank you very much two o'clock

↩ All hearings