Evidence from RBKC and KCTMO (15 November 2018 Pt 1 of 2)

15 November 2018 · RBKC/KCTMO Representatives, Counsel to the Inquiry · 4:05:20
▶ Watch on YouTube Open in interactive viewer

Evidence session examining the role of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and/or the Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation in the management and refurbishment of Grenfell Tower.

Key moments

Full transcript

# Transcribed with OpenAI Whisper (medium model)

# Source: Local audio transcription (no YouTube captions available)

00:00:00 you

00:00:30 you

00:01:00 you

00:01:30 you

00:02:00 you

00:02:30 you

00:03:00 you

00:03:30 you

00:04:00 you

00:04:30 you

00:05:00 you

00:05:30 you

00:06:00 you

00:06:30 you

00:07:00 you

00:07:30 you

00:08:00 you

00:08:30 you

00:09:00 you

00:09:02 you

00:09:04 you

00:09:06 you

00:09:28 Good morning everyone. Welcome to today's hearing.

00:09:31 Today we're going to hear from some other people who were within the cordon during the fire.

00:09:37 Yes, Mr. Millett.

00:09:39 Good morning, Mr. Chairman. May I now please call Mr. Nicholas Layton of RBKC.

00:09:46 Yes, thank you.

00:10:01 I swear by Almighty God that the evidence I shall give shall be the truth and nothing but the truth.

00:10:20 Thank you very much, Mr. Layton. Sit down, make yourself comfortable.

00:10:24 Yes, Mr. Millett.

00:10:26 Yes, Mr. Millett.

00:10:28 Mr. Layton, good morning. Can I ask you please to give the Chairman your full name?

00:10:32 Nicholas James Layton.

00:10:34 Can I start by thanking you very much for attending today and giving evidence to the inquiry and assisting us in our investigations.

00:10:41 We very much appreciate it. If at any stage you feel you need a break, please let us know and we can take a short break.

00:10:49 It's never a difficulty. I do aim to take a break after about an hour anyway.

00:10:53 But if you, as I say, if you need a break at any time before that, all you have to do is indicate.

00:10:59 I try and keep my questions as short and simple as possible.

00:11:03 If you don't understand a question I've asked or you want me to put the question in a different way, I'm very happy to do that as well.

00:11:10 Thank you.

00:11:12 Now, you've provided two witness statements.

00:11:16 The first is your statement that you gave to the police on the 20th of September 2017.

00:11:21 And that is MET quadruple 07967.

00:11:27 I'll just read that formally into the record. If you could identify that as your statement.

00:11:33 Yes, it is.

00:11:35 You're very welcome to use the big screen. It ought to come up on the monitor in front of you as well, which you might find is a bit less tiring on the neck.

00:11:42 Yes, I should also say, Mr. Layton, that in front of you on the desk there is a blue file with the hard copy documents in it that I'm going to refer to.

00:11:49 So you can look at that as well. But most witnesses tend to find it easier to use the monitor on the desk.

00:11:55 So there's your MET statement of the 20th of September 2017.

00:12:00 You've also provided a statement to the inquiry under Rule 9, dated the 11th of September 2018.

00:12:08 And that is RBK triple 029034. If we could please have that up on the screen.

00:12:15 There it is. Is that your statement of the inquiry?

00:12:19 Yes.

00:12:21 Can I ask you to turn please to the last page of that statement, which is page 13 in the relativity reference.

00:12:30 And you'll see that there is a statement of truth there with the signature underneath it. Is that your signature?

00:12:35 Yes.

00:12:37 Have you had an opportunity to read both of these statements, your police statement and your inquiry statement, recently?

00:12:42 Yes.

00:12:44 And can you confirm that they are true to the best of your knowledge and recollection?

00:12:47 Yes.

00:12:49 And subject to what you're going to tell us this morning as your evidence to the inquiry?

00:12:54 Yes.

00:12:56 Okay. Now you've also produced a number of exhibits to your inquiry statement.

00:13:03 And I'll just read those formally into the record.

00:13:06 There's NL1, which is your LELO log, RBK triple 029036.

00:13:11 NL2, your duty officer manual 2017, RBK triple 029035.

00:13:19 NL3, your major incident contact sheet, RBK triple 029032.

00:13:26 And NL4, the RBK SMG incident log book, RBK triple 029033.

00:13:34 And I've now read those formally into the record so that they are there.

00:13:37 I'm going to ask you questions this morning, focusing on the events which took place within McAllden on the night of the fire up until about 8 a.m. that morning.

00:13:48 There will of course be other questions that will arise which will form part of phase two of this inquiry, including things like the aftermath of the fire and events later on, on the 14th of June.

00:14:02 Can I start then by asking you some questions about your position and your career?

00:14:07 You are, I think, currently a security officer employed by AME PLC.

00:14:13 Yes, sir.

00:14:14 And they've got the facilities contract with RBKC, is that right?

00:14:18 That is correct.

00:14:19 And I think you joined the borough in October 1995.

00:14:23 Correct.

00:14:24 And prior to your current role, I think you worked as a customer services officer and a security officer and then a hall keeper.

00:14:31 Yes, sir.

00:14:33 Yes, you did.

00:14:34 Now, in addition to those roles, I think you work for the borough now as an on-call borough duty officer.

00:14:43 Correct.

00:14:44 And that's sometimes referred to as a BDO, is that right?

00:14:47 Yes, that is correct.

00:14:48 And also as a local authority liaison officer or LALO.

00:14:53 Correct.

00:14:54 Is it LALO or LALO?

00:14:55 LALO.

00:14:56 Right.

00:14:57 How long have you been a LALO for?

00:14:58 Approximately 2002 I started.

00:15:02 2002?

00:15:03 Yes.

00:15:04 Right.

00:15:05 So up to the night of the fire, you had been a LALO for some 15 years or so?

00:15:10 Yes, I have.

00:15:11 Okay.

00:15:12 Now, in your statement to the inquiry, if I can take you please to paragraph 6.4, which you'll find on page 3, you say, and it'll come up on the monitor in front of you,

00:15:28 page 3 of your inquiry statement.

00:15:31 That's RBK00029034.

00:15:36 At the top of the screen there, I have received training from the borough,

00:15:40 and which includes specific emergency scenarios.

00:15:44 The training included reacting to different emergency scenarios.

00:15:49 Was that training that you received in your capacity as a LALO?

00:15:54 Yes, it was.

00:15:55 And have you completed LALO training?

00:15:59 Well, let me ask you this way.

00:16:00 Are there two levels of training for LALO, level 1 and level 2?

00:16:03 No, there's just one standard of training for LALOs.

00:16:07 Right.

00:16:08 And are you fully trained as a LALO?

00:16:10 Yes, I am, sir.

00:16:11 Now, the training that you refer to in that paragraph, what form did it take?

00:16:15 We did practical exercises, which normally run from the halls at Chelsey Hill Town Hall,

00:16:21 which includes other major services, the LFB, ambulance services, police,

00:16:27 and it's getting together to actually formalise ways of doing things in certain situations.

00:16:34 And did that training include dealing with a fire?

00:16:40 A tower block, no.

00:16:42 But a fire, yes?

00:16:44 A fire as in an event, yes.

00:16:47 How big an event did that train?

00:16:49 How big a fire event?

00:16:51 The fire itself was small, but it was in some of the things, it was a thing that we've done for the Chelsey Flower Show, where we dealt with the fire.

00:17:01 I see.

00:17:02 And did that event on which you were trained include how to deal with a major incident, as understood in the JEZIP interoperability framework?

00:17:17 Yes, it did.

00:17:18 It did.

00:17:18 It did.

00:17:21 Are you familiar with the JEZIP interoperability framework?

00:17:25 No, I'm not.

00:17:26 Right.

00:17:27 Have you ever had any training on it?

00:17:28 Not specifically to that, no, sir.

00:17:30 Right.

00:17:31 Have you ever had any training on the London Resilience Partnership Strategic Coordination Protocol?

00:17:37 I have had training, certain amount of training with the resilience, but only from our local authority side.

00:17:44 And did that training involve dealing with a major incident?

00:17:48 Did it involve a fire major incident?

00:17:50 That one, no.

00:17:52 Right.

00:17:53 What was the training that you received?

00:17:55 That was, I think it was a terrorist event, that one.

00:18:00 And what about the LEL, sorry, the LESLP major incident procedure manual?

00:18:07 Are you familiar with that?

00:18:08 Fairly familiar, yes, sir.

00:18:10 Not 100%.

00:18:11 Very familiar, but not 100%.

00:18:13 Have you ever had training on the LESLP major incident manual?

00:18:16 Manual?

00:18:18 Locally, yes.

00:18:19 And what was that training, what did that involve?

00:18:21 I can't remember the exact details, but that was training that was done at Kensington Town Hall.

00:18:27 Did that involve a major fire?

00:18:30 I don't think so, no, sir.

00:18:32 Right.

00:18:33 Prior to the night of the 13th, 14th of June 2017, when was the last training session on any of these protocols or procedures that you received?

00:18:44 Probably 18 months to two years.

00:18:49 And who delivered that training?

00:18:52 The Royal Borough of Kensington, Chelsea.

00:18:54 In-house or was it outsourced?

00:18:57 In-house.

00:18:58 And what department within the borough?

00:19:03 The emergency planning team.

00:19:05 Who heads the emergency planning team?

00:19:07 David Kerry.

00:19:08 David Kerry.

00:19:10 Right.

00:19:11 Now, in terms of your experience as a LELO, you say at paragraph 6.6 of your statement, still on the same page up there on the screen,

00:19:21 I've dealt with quite a few major incidents through the years.

00:19:25 For example, I was a LELO at a large gas leak, a shooting, as well as at the Trellick Towers fire.

00:19:33 The Trellick Towers fire, I think, was April 2017.

00:19:37 Yes.

00:19:38 It was precise, the 19th of April 2017.

00:19:42 In what capacity were you involved with that fire?

00:19:46 As a LELO.

00:19:48 And what did you do in that capacity at that fire?

00:19:52 I attended site, liaised with the emergency services.

00:19:58 Compared to Grampel, this was, I suppose, simple because the procedure that they had in place with the fire services

00:20:08 and the building itself worked, and we didn't even need to set up a rest centre for that one.

00:20:15 No.

00:20:17 Were there any lessons as a LELO that you took away from the Trellick Tower?

00:20:24 I would say no, because all the procedures and effects worked very well on that one.

00:20:31 Other than the Trellick Tower fire, how many other fire incidents of substance have you been involved as a LELO in?

00:20:41 Before Trellick Tower, no real major fires.

00:20:48 And prior to Grampel Tower, were there any incidents which had been declared a major incident in which you acted as a LELO?

00:21:01 Not for a very long time.

00:21:04 The last one was possibly the, I'm not sure whether it was the baby falling out of the block of flats or the shooting on King's Road.

00:21:18 And when were those?

00:21:20 They were not escalated to a high level of emergencies.

00:21:24 Right. And there are different levels of major incidents, aren't there?

00:21:27 Yes.

00:21:27 As we'll see in a moment. When were those events?

00:21:32 I can't remember the exact dates.

00:21:36 Now turning to the night of the fire itself and your role on the night, you have described your role as a LELO in your statement at paragraph 6.

00:21:49 And it's also set out in the duty officer manual.

00:21:53 If I can just take you to that. It's RBK00029035.

00:22:06 And at page 1 you can see that this is the borough duty officer duty silver manual 2017.

00:22:13 Just to be clear, was this the relevant current document as at the night of the fire?

00:22:20 Yes it was.

00:22:20 And we can see the date at the bottom, 24th April 2017. Can I ask you please to turn to page 39 first of all in that document.

00:22:33 Under CMP 5.4, page 39.

00:22:41 CMP 5.4. And CMP stands for, will you tell me what it stands for?

00:22:47 I can't remember.

00:22:49 Contingency management plan?

00:22:51 Yes sir.

00:22:52 Right.

00:22:53 Okay. 39 says this.

00:22:56 The LELO will represent the council at the scene of an incident or emergency as council silver with full authority to call upon and deploy council as required.

00:23:05 Key tasks are to attend the scene when called upon by the emergency services, provide a single point of contact between the emergency services and the council, and a link between the incident scene and the emergency services.

00:23:17 And the BEC, just pausing there, could you just tell us what the BEC is?

00:23:22 The Bury Military Command Centre.

00:23:25 And one was set up on the night wasn't it?

00:23:28 Yes it was.

00:23:29 And who, just to tell us while we're on this, who was in charge of the BEC at the time?

00:23:32 David Kerry.

00:23:33 David Kerry. Now just looking down at the rest of the bullet points, I'm not going to read them all out aloud to you, you can see what they are.

00:23:42 Would you agree that all of these functions were part of your role on the night?

00:23:47 And if you then go back a page in the duty silver manual to page 38, you can see that at the top of the page, under the section major emergencies 10 and 10.1, local authority liaison officer, it says this.

00:24:11 If a major emergency occurs out of hours, the borough duty officer will be informed of it by the out of hours service.

00:24:18 The BDO will then be responsible for assessing the scale of the emergency and if appropriate, active, well that should be active eight, the contingency management plan.

00:24:28 On the night of the fire were you aware that that was what you had to do as the lay low on duty?

00:24:32 And then going on, you can see a longish list of things that have to happen in order to activate the contingency management plan, the CMP.

00:24:49 And the first is to evaluate, or the second is to evaluate the level of the emergency.

00:24:53 And if level one, deal with using the borough duty officer manual and pass to the relevant service for action, if level two or three start an emergency event log, we can see that.

00:25:06 First of all, as the borough lay low on that night, did you activate the RBKC contingency management plan?

00:25:17 Yes I did.

00:25:19 And did you evaluate the level of the emergency?

00:25:23 Yes. From the information I had already received from GDIC, the out of hours call management service, I determined that for me it was a major instance.

00:25:33 I immediately contacted David Kerry to instigate the BEC.

00:25:37 Yes. And did you start an emergency event log as per this checklist?

00:25:45 My own list, yes sir.

00:25:46 Your own list. Yes. And the emergency event log, is that something that's up to the individual lay low or is there a format?

00:25:55 I was not aware of a specific format at that time.

00:25:58 Right. And then looking at the checklist, a little bit lower down, it says, if an external emergency, and this is three bullet points up from the bottom,

00:26:16 call the first available designated activation officer, CNX1, and provide a briefing on the incident, repeating the information on the emergency report form. Did you do that?

00:26:26 I contacted David Kerry immediately.

00:26:28 Right. And he was the designated activation officer. Was it he who activated the RBKC plan or was it you?

00:26:34 Yes, it was he who activated the plan.

00:26:36 Right. Now, going, we'll come back to this if we need to, going back to the statement, your statement.

00:26:50 Can I take you please to paragraph 8 on page 3?

00:26:56 And you say there towards the bottom of the page, on the night of the Grenfell Tower fire, I was contacted just after 2am by GDIT,

00:27:03 the out of hours call answering service for the borough.

00:27:07 I was informed that there had been a fire reported at Grenfell Tower and that there was possibly three or four fatalities.

00:27:13 GDIT told me that the emergency services were on site, and I recall being told that there were 15 pumps in attendance.

00:27:21 I knew from this information that this was a serious incident and would require a major response.

00:27:26 Now, I've read that all to you so that you've got the whole of your evidence in mind, Mr. Layton.

00:27:31 But first of all, you say you were contacted just after 2am. How do you remember that it was just after 2am?

00:27:43 I think I looked at my phone at the time because it was the middle of the night and I was woken by the call.

00:27:54 Right. Now, in your police witness statement, and we can look at it if we need to, you said that it was approximately 2.10am.

00:28:01 Do you remember saying that to the police and that being in your statement?

00:28:05 Yes.

00:28:07 When you made your statement in September 2017, did you recall that time or did you look at a document?

00:28:13 No. When I made the statement in September 2017, I had no documentation to support anything I was saying at that time

00:28:23 because I hadn't received my notes back from...

00:28:26 When I finished as lay low at 7 o'clock in the morning, I handed over my notes to Mike Rumble who had actually carried on doing that day.

00:28:36 Yes, I see. So when you then came to make your statement for the inquiry in September this year and put just after 2am in paragraph 8,

00:28:46 did you look at a document then to refresh your memory?

00:28:50 Not at the time, no.

00:28:52 Right. So can you account for the difference between 2.10am and just after 2am?

00:28:58 It may not sound a lot, but is there a reason for the difference?

00:29:01 No, I couldn't say.

00:29:03 Now, was the message you refer to from GDIT the first message or attempt to contact you?

00:29:10 Yes.

00:29:12 How long did your call with GDIT last?

00:29:16 I would say no more than about two to three minutes.

00:29:19 Do you remember who you spoke to?

00:29:20 No, I do not.

00:29:22 Do you remember what information you were given beyond what we see on the page at paragraph 8?

00:29:31 No, I don't.

00:29:34 And you say that you recall being told there were 15 pumps in attendance. Are you confident that it was 15?

00:29:45 I'm pretty confident, yes.

00:29:47 Right.

00:29:49 Nobody said at this stage that it was 40?

00:29:54 No.

00:29:55 Or even 25?

00:29:56 No.

00:29:57 All right. And just tell me, GDIT, is that the out of hours service?

00:30:03 That is the out of hours service, yes.

00:30:05 And do you know who had contacted GDIT in order to get them to call you?

00:30:11 That would have been the London Fire Brigade.

00:30:13 Right.

00:30:14 And do you know when GDIT had been called?

00:30:19 Later, when I took the call they said they had just received the call.

00:30:25 I see. Did the person you spoke to at GDIT tell you that a major incident had been called?

00:30:39 Yes.

00:30:40 Did they tell you who had called the major incident or declared the major incident?

00:30:44 It came from the LFB.

00:30:46 It came from the LFB?

00:30:48 Yes.

00:30:49 Right. Okay. Did the caller tell you that the Metropolitan Police had declared a major incident?

00:30:59 No, not that I'm aware of.

00:31:00 Now, at paragraph nine of your statement you say that I immediately called David Kerry to let him know.

00:31:15 So that was, I'm assuming, straight after your call from GDIT was over.

00:31:22 And you've confirmed, I think, that he was the contingency planning manager or the emergency planning officer.

00:31:27 Yeah.

00:31:27 Is there a difference between those two descriptions of his roles?

00:31:31 There's two roles, sir.

00:31:33 There are two roles. What's the difference between the contingency planning manager and the emergency planning officer?

00:31:38 I don't know what they define that as, sir.

00:31:41 Okay. All right.

00:31:43 And you, I think, said that he's the activation officer within the LELO procedure we've seen on page 38 of the silver manual.

00:31:49 Silver manual. We can see his emergency event log sheet because he opened one and that's RBEK00028849.

00:31:59 We can just have that, please, up on the screen.

00:32:07 And he, it looks as if he opened that at 0221 with your call, call from Nick Layton, borough duty officer.

00:32:19 Fire at Grenfell Tower. Police called GDIT at 02-03.

00:32:25 Evacuees, persons trapped, casualties, RVP at Beaumont Road.

00:32:30 Now, first of all, do you know why or can you account for the time lag or time elapse between 02-03 when, as he says, the police called GDIT

00:32:49 and 02-21 when you call him according to his log?

00:32:53 No, I cannot.

00:32:55 When he wrote police called GDIT, is that right, to the best of your recollection?

00:33:03 If he's put that, that is confirmed that I would be.

00:33:06 Right. So, to doing the best you can, does it, does that tell us that when GDIT called you, they told you that the police had called them?

00:33:15 It is possible.

00:33:17 And, and the?

00:33:19 I'm not going to, I cannot say for definite.

00:33:21 That would, right, no, sure. Does that tell us then that the police told you that the LFB had declared a major incident?

00:33:29 I can't say so.

00:33:31 Right. How certain are you that you told David Kerry that it was the police who called GDIT at that time?

00:33:40 I would say that's accurate that I really said that to him.

00:33:44 Right. Now, at paragraph nine of your statement, if we can go back to that please, you say that you relayed to him the scale of the emergency.

00:33:59 This is three lines up from the beginning, from the end of the paragraph. You say, during my initial call to David, I relayed to him the scale of the emergency.

00:34:07 Did you tell him they were, did you tell him there were casualties?

00:34:10 Yes, I did.

00:34:11 Did you say to him that the Met had declared a major incident?

00:34:14 No, I didn't.

00:34:16 Did you tell him that the Met had declared a major incident?

00:34:20 Yes, I did.

00:34:22 Did you tell him that the Met had declared a major incident?

00:34:25 No, I didn't.

00:34:26 No, I didn't.

00:34:28 Did you tell him that a major incident had been declared?

00:34:32 I told him that this was a major incident and that we needed to set up the Met.

00:34:38 Right. Did you tell him that the LFB had declared a major incident?

00:34:41 I can't remember.

00:34:43 Right. Would you ordinarily expect to be told, based on the training and the experience that you had, that one or other or both of the LFB and the Metropolitan Police

00:34:56 had declared a major incident?

00:34:59 Not always.

00:35:01 They would tell us, normally the call would come through, that they require a lay low for a major incident as such, but it's the level of the incident.

00:35:12 I think you touched on this earlier on this morning, but were you told or did you understand that this incident was a level three major incident, as defined in the contingency management plan?

00:35:35 That was my judgment at the time.

00:35:37 Let's just have a look at that. It's RBK0004396, page 34.

00:35:46 This is paragraph 4, section 4.5 within the CMP.

00:36:13 It's a scale and impact. You can see that there are three levels. Level one, which is yellow, minor, limited. Level two, which is amber, medium, disruptive. Level three, which is red, major, severe.

00:36:31 So when you say in your statement, when you tell us that you thought this was major, is that what you're referring to?

00:36:38 Yes, sir.

00:36:38 Yes, sir. Right. And had you made the assessment of impact on the community and council response that we can see in those two blocks there, of the document?

00:36:51 Yes.

00:36:52 Now, in paragraph 10 of your statement, if we can move forward to that, Mr. Layton, page 4 of the statement, you say, in his role as contingency planning manager, David would then escalate the matter and notify all other necessary people.

00:37:15 He would also set up the borough's BEC, Borough Emergency Control Centre. This is where the borough would manage the incident and its response. People on the ground such as myself as Lalo pass information to BEC and BEC coordinate and manage everything going on.

00:37:29 And then you give an example. And then you say at the end, the Lalo is the eyes and ears for the BEC. Now, first of all, do you know where the BEC for this incident was to be set up?

00:37:42 Initially, it would have been at David Kerry's home because he would have set up on his laptop to get things going. Then it would be moved over to the town hall where we have a control centre purposely designed.

00:37:57 And who assisted David Kerry set the BEC up in its early stages?

00:38:04 I do not know.

00:38:06 Who then began to assist David Kerry once he began to pull in staff to help him? Do you know?

00:38:12 I do not know.

00:38:15 Did you and David Kerry discuss on your first call what information, for example, about the residence or about the building you might need to get hold of or give to the LFB?

00:38:28 I do not know.

00:38:30 When we made our first call, I was actually still back in location at home. I passed on all the relevant details and told them that I would update them once I got to the actual scene.

00:38:43 Right.

00:38:44 Once you had finished updating David Kerry on that first call, did you go then directly to the scene?

00:39:02 Yes.

00:39:04 Do you know how long it took you to get to the scene after that call?

00:39:06 A bit longer than normal because I did drive over to that area and then I had to find somewhere to park quite a distance away and then I walked the remainder.

00:39:15 And do you say in your statement at paragraph 11, if we can just move to that, still on page 4 of your statement, at paragraph 11, I arrived at the scene of the fire shortly after 2.30am?

00:39:29 Approximately, yes.

00:39:30 And indeed, just to pin this to a contemporaneous document, your LELO log, if we can just go to that, shows that it's at RBK00029036.

00:39:48 And if you go to the very top of that page, you can see, and this is the first page of that document, on-site 2.30.

00:40:00 Now, just underneath number one, very top of the page, on-site 2.30.

00:40:10 This looks like a piece of paper taken from a pad.

00:40:14 Is this a private piece of paper you had?

00:40:16 It's a notepad that I keep in my folder.

00:40:18 Right, I see.

00:40:20 It's not a formal document that's required by or is a format of any kind.

00:40:24 Okay. And did you start recording the events of that night as soon as you finished the call with David Carey or before?

00:40:36 I started recording as soon as I got to the site.

00:40:39 As soon as you got to the site, okay.

00:40:41 And you can see that that's about 2.30.

00:40:43 Now, you may not know this, but Mike Rumble used an incident pack from another borough, Lambeth, I believe.

00:40:52 Hammersmith probably, sir.

00:40:54 Or is it Hammersmith? Okay.

00:40:56 Did it occur to you to use a Laylow incident pack from another borough?

00:41:03 No.

00:41:04 Okay.

00:41:05 Why is that?

00:41:06 I don't normally have associations with other boroughs at the time.

00:41:11 Is it right that since the fire, RBKAC has introduced an incident logbook?

00:41:16 Yes, it is.

00:41:16 Okay. Now, when you arrived, were you wearing any either jacket or any other kind of external indication?

00:41:24 No.

00:41:25 Which told people you were from RBKAC?

00:41:27 No.

00:41:28 Why is that?

00:41:29 I didn't have any.

00:41:30 Does one normally have one?

00:41:32 I have now, but I didn't at that time.

00:41:35 You didn't at that time.

00:41:37 Did the council issue any Laylows with any kind of external indication that they were a Laylow at a scene?

00:41:42 As far as I'm aware, not at that time.

00:41:45 Not at that time. Right.

00:41:47 Now, I think we can pin down your arrival at the command unit with some precision.

00:41:59 I just wanted to take you to your statement first of all.

00:42:03 Paragraph 13, you say, I walked towards the tower until I got to a police cordon and asked them where the command station was.

00:42:12 I showed them my ID.

00:42:14 They directed me in the direction of the command center, which was a fire truck at the base of the tower situated on Bowmore Road near Kensington Leisure Center.

00:42:24 You describe what you were seeing from the tower or in the tower, at the tower, on your way.

00:42:29 I just want to play a short clip that has already been shown to the inquiry, Mr. Layton, which is a clip of video from Inspector Thatcher's body wall.

00:42:42 It's a video footage. It's about a minute of that.

00:42:46 I just ought to give you fair warning that it may bring back memories of the night itself.

00:42:54 And so if you want to break at any point during seeing it, all you have to do is say so.

00:43:00 It's INQ.

00:43:02 Before we put it up, you're comfortable with this, I hope?

00:43:05 Yes.

00:43:07 Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

00:43:08 It's INQ, Quinn Tupel 0524.

00:43:38 Can I give you guys a... sorry, do you ask the I?

00:43:41 This is Chuck from the Council.

00:43:43 Lovely job.

00:43:45 Can we get the Academy open?

00:43:47 I've got colleagues working on opening up the rest of the centre already.

00:43:50 We've got buses coming to take people to wherever you are, just to house when they come off.

00:43:54 Excellent news.

00:43:56 I'm listening.

00:43:58 Right. Can you just wait here then, so I know where you are. What's your name again, sir?

00:44:03 Nick Layton.

00:44:05 Oh, I spoke to you the other day.

00:44:06 Was it on the...

00:44:08 We had two buses off the Sheffields Bush, not too far away, and...

00:44:15 Now, we've seen that.

00:44:20 Was that the moment when, or the time at which you were arriving at the command unit and presenting yourself there?

00:44:28 I couldn't say for definite, sir.

00:44:29 Okay. Does that trigger a recollection as to whether that was the first time, or around about that time, that you arrived at the command unit?

00:44:36 I would say pretty close.

00:44:39 Okay. Now, we've got an adjusted time for that as 2.47, and that clip runs from 2.47 to 2.47.40.

00:44:49 Can I just ask you, when you got, or arrived, at Grenfell Tower, did you go straight to the command unit, or was that the first time?

00:44:59 Or did you do other things first?

00:45:01 I went straight to the command unit.

00:45:05 Right. So, would that help us pin your arrival time at the incident more accurately to about 2.47?

00:45:15 I would say yes, sir.

00:45:17 Okay. Now, once you got to the command unit, as we've seen from that clip, did you liaise with anybody from the London Fire Brigade?

00:45:24 Yes, I reported straight into the London Fire Brigade to...

00:45:27 Do you remember...

00:45:29 ...and I was there, given my details, contact numbers.

00:45:32 Do you remember who you reported to?

00:45:34 No, I don't.

00:45:36 Do you remember what rank? Could you tell what rank?

00:45:39 No, I don't know the ranking system, but he introduced himself as the incident commander at the time.

00:45:45 Right. And did the incident commander give you any particular instructions at that time?

00:45:57 No, sir. And the first thing that they asked for was to... they wanted to open up the sports centre as a temporary mortuary, which I took the decision myself and agreed to.

00:46:12 Although I didn't have any keys, I gave them permission to force entry.

00:46:19 I'll come back to that in a moment. I'm going to pick it up in your statement.

00:46:22 But just before I do, can I ask you, did you speak to the... apart from what we've just seen when you spoke to Inspector Thatcher, did you liaise with the police in more general terms about what you should be doing?

00:46:34 I spoke to the police, told them I was there to give them any assistance that is required. We obviously already knew that we were in need of rest centres.

00:46:43 I think it was the police that said they had an offer from Belluccio's to be set up as a rest centre.

00:46:53 Yes. Now coming back to what you just said about what you were told by the incident commander, can I go please to paragraph 14 of your statement, which is over the page on page 5.

00:47:05 You say that upon my arrival at the command centre, the first thing I was told by the incident controller was that they required a mortuary to be set up in which to move the deceased, as there was already bodies lying around which needed to be moved.

00:47:20 The emergency services asked if they could set up the mortuary in the adjacent sports centre. Whilst I did not have any keys to access the sports centre, I immediately gave permission for them to force entry to allow it to be used.

00:47:31 And then you go on to talk about tents and temporary mortuary. From your last answer, but one, I think that was the incident commander who told you that.

00:47:43 Yes.

00:47:45 Did you know at the time that his name was Assistant Commissioner Row, Andy Row?

00:47:49 It's possible that he did tell me, sir.

00:47:50 Right. And who asked you to set up the mortuary in the sports centre? You say the emergency services, but who? Was it the LFB or the police?

00:48:10 I'm going by that. I would say the LFB, sir, if that's not my statement.

00:48:13 Okay.

00:48:14 Now, you didn't have the keys, did you?

00:48:16 No, sir.

00:48:17 So you gave permission for the door to be broken down?

00:48:19 Yes.

00:48:20 Do you know who broke the door down into the sports centre?

00:48:24 No, I don't.

00:48:27 Do you know somebody called Michael Perkins? Does that name ring a bell?

00:48:31 The name rings a bell from possibly the second rest centre that we set up.

00:48:36 Did he have a pair of, or set of keys to the sports centre?

00:48:39 Not in the time that we have.

00:48:42 Right. Now, in terms of your role for the rest of the night, you say moving forward in your statement to Perkins, you're going to be the first person to be called to the rest centre.

00:48:52 Not in the time that we have.

00:48:54 Right. Now, in terms of your role for the rest of the night, you say moving forward in your statement to paragraph 21, that, and this is the last three lines of that paragraph,

00:49:08 my duty that night was to report on what was happening with the survivors and to organise rest centres for them.

00:49:17 David Kerry was requesting the Red Cross to attend at each of the rest centres.

00:49:22 Was that the only task that you were required to do?

00:49:28 At various points I was doing, bits and pieces, I was lazy also at times with the LAS to try and organise if we could have paramedics at the rest centres that we were setting up, and bits and pieces, dealing with any requests as it came through.

00:49:47 Right. And looking back at the duty officer manual, we don't need to necessarily to do that, but you understood that, is this right, that you were the single point of contact between the emergency services and the council?

00:50:01 Yes.

00:50:02 And also a link between the incident scene and the BEC?

00:50:05 Yes.

00:50:07 And that also you had to continue to monitor the council's requirements on an ongoing basis throughout the night?

00:50:15 Yes.

00:50:15 So you understood that those were your responsibilities?

00:50:18 Yes.

00:50:19 Now, you go on to say, in the same paragraph, in the middle of that paragraph, I was mainly situated with the Silver Fire Command on base level, which was a fire truck placed within the grounds of Grenfell Tower, that was just above where we just looked at.

00:50:39 Yes.

00:50:39 Now, that's, I'm assuming, the LFB command unit that we've just seen in the video clip?

00:50:45 Yes.

00:50:46 Which we've called CU8. Where did you stand or base yourself?

00:50:50 Literally right outside the vehicle.

00:50:52 Right. And did you always stay there, or did you leave CU8 command unit to carry out other tasks?

00:51:00 I did leave on occasions.

00:51:02 Right. How long did you spend away from the command unit, do you think, on those occasions?

00:51:05 Probably five or ten minutes at a time.

00:51:09 Where did you go?

00:51:11 I did go around checking other areas to see if I could see anything that we could do directly, but I didn't travel too far from the command centre because I was the point of contact there.

00:51:23 Yes.

00:51:24 And was there any particular LFB officer with whom you were in regular contact outside the Silver meetings?

00:51:32 No.

00:51:32 So did you talk to them through the hatch, the window hatch outside of the command unit?

00:51:38 If they needed anything, they would call me back to the vehicle. As I was outside, most of the time they would speak to me outside the vehicle.

00:51:48 Most of the time they would speak to me outside the vehicle.

00:51:53 Now you say that you were the first LELO to arrive before being joined by Mike Rumble.

00:52:06 And this is paragraph 21 of your statement at the very top of that paragraph.

00:52:12 And you put his time of arrival at 3.20am.

00:52:17 Approximately.

00:52:18 Approximately 3.20am as support LELO.

00:52:23 Now I just want to explore a timing point with you Mr. Layton.

00:52:27 Can I ask you please to go to your notes at RBK00029036 at page one.

00:52:34 We looked at it before.

00:52:36 And can I ask you to look at item five in the left hand column.

00:52:44 A third of the way down the page where it says Mike on site 3.10.

00:52:48 Now given that is in your contemporaneous note, can you explain why your statement says 3.20?

00:52:57 No I can't. I'd say that the time there is more accurate.

00:53:01 So the time in your contemporaneous note is more accurate than your statement?

00:53:04 Yes.

00:53:05 Right, thank you.

00:53:06 Now looking at paragraph 24 of your statement if we can, you say that you attended Silver meeting at 3.20am.

00:53:18 And in the fourth line of that paragraph you say the first Silver meeting took place at 03.15am.

00:53:30 And the London Fire Brigade's incident control commander chaired these meetings and they were minuted by the LFB.

00:53:36 Each representative updated on what service they were providing, what resources they had and how they were doing.

00:53:42 I provided an update on the rest centres.

00:53:44 Now do you remember whether Mike Rumble arrived before or after that TCM, that first TCM?

00:53:55 I think it was just before.

00:53:57 Right.

00:54:01 Now you've described his role as that of a support lay low.

00:54:05 Can you explain that role further for us?

00:54:07 Yeah, if I needed any assistance there he could provide it. He could go around to other areas if required.

00:54:17 Did you divide your responsibilities between you?

00:54:20 No we didn't.

00:54:21 You didn't.

00:54:22 So he was basically a helper for you at that time?

00:54:25 Yes.

00:54:26 Now I'm not going to ask you about what you say at paragraphs 14 and 15 in your statement earlier on about the rest centres.

00:54:36 That will be explored at a later stage in this inquiry.

00:54:39 So I'm going to ask you about this point in the night.

00:54:42 Dealing with the first TCM tactical coordination meeting, which you say took place at 3.15am.

00:54:55 Can I just take you back to your lay low log at page one?

00:54:59 That's RBK00029036 again.

00:55:02 And you see under item six in the left hand column two thirds of the way down the page, silver meat, 3.15.

00:55:14 When you put 3.15 in your statement at paragraph 24, is that where, is this document where you got that time from?

00:55:22 Yes.

00:55:22 Now we can see what you've written there under silver meat 3.15, and your own assistant commissioner, 100 still in, trapped to prox, etc.

00:55:41 We can read that.

00:55:41 At that point, did you, or during that meeting, did you understand clearly that occupants of the building were now being told to self evacuate?

00:55:56 No.

00:55:57 Was there any discussion you can recall of that having been, or that being the advice now being given by the LFB to the occupants of the building who called?

00:56:11 They did. You see my notes there. There's a note there to self evacuate.

00:56:16 Self evacuate. So you've picked that up there. Can you just expand on what was being said at the meeting which led you to write self evacuate?

00:56:27 I would say that during that meeting that they stated that the advice would now be given to self evacuate the building.

00:56:35 Do you remember whether there was any discussion about when that advice had begun to be given?

00:56:42 Did you ask?

00:56:43 No.

00:56:45 Did you think at that time that the advice to self evacuate might have an impact on your role as LELO in any way?

00:56:54 Yes.

00:56:56 In what way?

00:56:57 In the fact that we would need more resources for rest centres.

00:57:02 Anything else?

00:57:04 Not at that time, no.

00:57:11 Did you think at that time that you might need to put in place some kind of system to identify who was coming out of the building, self evacuating, and link them to particular flats?

00:57:24 No.

00:57:25 Now it doesn't appear from your record of that meeting that you were asked for plans of the building or a list of residents.

00:57:37 Do you remember whether you were in fact at that meeting asked for plans of the building?

00:57:43 No.

00:57:44 Do you remember whether you were asked for a list of residents at that meeting?

00:57:48 No.

00:57:49 Well when you say no do you mean you recall that you weren't asked?

00:57:52 I don't believe I was asked.

00:57:55 No.

00:57:56 All right.

00:57:57 Thank you.

00:57:58 Now I'm going to turn on to the topic of your liaison with TMO staff at the scene.

00:58:24 And this topic lasts a little bit of time.

00:58:28 Let's see how we go.

00:58:30 But I'm going to try and break after another 10 minutes.

00:58:33 So if that's, are you happy to continue?

00:58:36 Yes.

00:58:37 Thank you very much Mr. Baiten.

00:58:39 Can I ask you please to go to paragraph 22 of your statement still on page 7.

00:58:41 And you say there at approximately 3.30 to 3.45 a.m. Robert Black, Chief Executive Officer of Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organization, the TMO arrived with two colleagues from the TMO.

00:59:01 And then you go on to say I spoke directly with him and I'll come back to that.

00:59:04 Just pinpointing that.

00:59:05 Before I ask you about that, can I just ask you to help me with a number of general points about the TMO.

00:59:13 First of all, what did you understand on the night that the role of the TMO would be in responding to an emergency such as this?

00:59:22 It's the TMO's responsibility to cater for all their displaced residents.

00:59:28 You say cater for them.

00:59:30 Yes.

00:59:31 Can you expand?

00:59:32 Yes, we're going to get rest centres where we've actually set them up.

00:59:38 We would expect them to get staffing, look after the residents.

00:59:42 Right.

00:59:44 Now we'll expand, I'll explore that a bit more shortly.

00:59:49 Did you know at that time whether they had an emergency plan of their own?

00:59:53 I didn't know of the emergency plan.

00:59:56 You didn't know of it at all?

00:59:58 No.

00:59:59 Right.

00:59:59 Does that mean that you can't help me answer the question whether they had or hadn't activated their own emergency plan?

01:00:07 No, sir, I could not help you with that.

01:00:11 How did you understand that the TMO would be able to assist you as LELO in the activation and carrying out of the RBKC contingency management plan?

01:00:24 Once the TMO arrived, then I would be asking them to take on certain amount of responsibilities in order to assist us primarily with things like the rest centres in the first place.

01:00:36 When people want information about the residents, I would go directly to the TMO and ask them to supply this information.

01:00:43 Right.

01:00:44 Now let's look at some detail.

01:00:47 At paragraph 22, as we've just seen, you say that the TMO arrived at 3.30 to 3.45.

01:00:52 Now, just to put this to you, Mr Black says that he arrived at the scene at 2.30.

01:01:00 Can you comment on that?

01:01:02 I can only comment as to when I saw him.

01:01:05 Right.

01:01:10 And so the time of 3.30 to 3.45 is the time you saw Mr Black, not necessarily the time when you say he actually arrived at the scene.

01:01:18 Is that right?

01:01:19 Right.

01:01:22 Assuming for the moment that he did arrive at 2.30 and you only saw him an hour to an hour and a quarter later, do you know what he was doing, what his team was doing in the meantime?

01:01:32 No.

01:01:33 The first introduction I had with Robert Black was when he arrived by the command vehicle.

01:01:41 He introduced himself and just said, have you seen the news?

01:01:46 Which I replied, no I haven't.

01:01:47 Right. The news. Okay.

01:01:51 You've put 03.30 to 03.45. Now, do you remember what time the first tactical command meeting finished?

01:01:59 Probably about 3.30.

01:02:02 Just to pinpoint you in a document if I can to help you, can I ask you to be shown the row log, which is Assistant Commissioner Andy Rose log of the night, at MET Quadruple 05.4.

01:02:17 All 04, page 1.

01:02:30 Now this is the first page of an 11 page document of the various things that happened in the command unit after 2.47 once Assistant Commissioner Roe had taken insolent command.

01:02:44 And it's just so you know, this is a record taken by his logist, Jackie McConnachie, and halfway down the page it has 3.20 tactical coordination meeting.

01:02:57 And that then over the page is recorded as closing at 03.32.

01:03:03 If we can see the last entry just above 03.39 on page 2 of that document.

01:03:07 So based on what you told us before about 03.30, 03.32 is about right to the best of your recollection.

01:03:13 Yes. Okay. Now, my question therefore is, when you first saw Robert Black and his colleagues from the TMO, was that after the first TCM had concluded?

01:03:26 Yes.

01:03:27 And where did you see him?

01:03:29 Outside the control vehicle.

01:03:31 I see. So once it concluded, did you come outside and then see him there?

01:03:35 Yes.

01:03:38 And if I can just go back to your note, your notes, RBK 00029036 at page 1.

01:03:46 You...

01:03:56 You can see him there.

01:03:57 You...

01:04:15 You say it's item 8 underneath the redaction.

01:04:21 TMO on site 03.45.

01:04:25 Yes.

01:04:27 Would that tell us more accurately at what time you met Robert Black and his colleagues?

01:04:32 Yes.

01:04:33 Right. Do you know who the two colleagues who arrived with Robert Black were?

01:04:38 No.

01:04:39 Do the names Teresa Brown or Hash Shamshoon mean anything to you?

01:04:44 No.

01:04:45 What about Graham Webb? Does that name mean anything to you?

01:04:48 No.

01:04:48 Did you know or were you told that Hash Shamshoon had been there since 2.15?

01:04:57 No.

01:05:00 When Mr. Black arrived, did you ask him for any information?

01:05:05 No. When he arrived, I told him that we were setting up rest centres and that we needed... he needed to get staff in there to assist.

01:05:13 Is that the only topic that you covered with Mr. Black on that first encounter?

01:05:17 On that first meeting, yes.

01:05:19 Right.

01:05:20 What did he say?

01:05:21 He got on his phone and made some phone calls.

01:05:24 Right.

01:05:29 Were any of the TMO staff wearing anything to make their appearance known?

01:05:35 No.

01:05:36 So no indication that they were TMO people?

01:05:39 No.

01:05:43 Do you know somebody called Ken Wilson?

01:05:47 I know A. Ken Wilson within RBKC.

01:05:52 Okay. Was he a caretaker?

01:05:54 No, not this one.

01:05:58 Paragraph 22 of your statement, you say in the last part of that paragraph, the first instruction I gave to him was for him to arrange for his staff to get to the rest centres and staff them as quickly as possible.

01:06:11 Robert confirmed that he would arrange for this to happen. Did he and his staff then go and do this?

01:06:19 He made a phone call.

01:06:21 What else did he do?

01:06:24 Nothing at all.

01:06:27 Do you know what happened to the TMO staff? Where did they go?

01:06:30 I don't know.

01:06:32 Did they leave the command unit?

01:06:34 At times, yes.

01:06:36 Did you set up any kind of communication link with Robert Black or his staff?

01:06:40 No.

01:06:41 Why is that?

01:06:43 Because most of the time he was actually based with me.

01:06:46 Right. You say most of the time. It's difficult. How much of the time do you think he was based with you?

01:06:53 Probably 70 to 80% of the time.

01:06:56 Right. When you say based with you, you mean?

01:06:58 By the command vehicle.

01:07:00 Right. So a few feet away from you?

01:07:02 Yes.

01:07:04 Did you arrange to get any kind of updates from Robert Black or his staff?

01:07:07 I was chasing him at times for various information that was requested for us.

01:07:13 Once I put in a request, I would chase him to try and get updates as to when the information would be available.

01:07:22 Yes. Thank you.

01:07:24 Mr Chairman, I think now is an appropriate time for a break.

01:07:27 Is that a good point to make on you?

01:07:29 Well, Mr Lacon, we have a break roughly once an hour. I think it's quite tiring giving evidence.

01:07:32 So we'll take 10 minutes off now. I have to ask you not to talk to anyone about your evidence please while you're out of the room.

01:07:40 And if you go with the usher, we'll start again at 20 to 11.

01:07:44 Alright? If you'd like to go with the usher, she'll look after you.

01:08:02 Alright. 20 to 11 please.

01:08:32 Thank you.

01:09:02 Thank you.

01:09:32 Thank you.

01:10:02 Thank you.

01:10:32 Thank you.

01:11:02 Thank you.

01:11:32 Thank you.

01:12:02 Thank you.

01:12:32 Thank you.

01:13:02 Thank you.

01:13:32 Thank you.

01:14:02 Thank you.

01:14:32 Thank you.

01:15:02 Thank you.

01:15:32 Thank you.

01:16:02 Thank you.

01:16:32 Thank you.

01:17:02 Thank you.

01:17:32 Thank you.

01:18:02 Thank you.

01:18:32 Thank you.

01:19:02 Thank you.

01:19:32 Thank you.

01:20:02 Thank you.

01:20:32 Could you ask Mr. Leighton to come back in please?

01:20:55 Right Mr. Leighton, you happy to carry on?

01:20:57 Yes please.

01:20:58 Thank you very much. Yes Mr. Milley.

01:20:59 Mr. Leighton, thank you for coming back to us.

01:21:01 Paragraph 25 of your statement, if I can take you to that please,

01:21:05 on page 7 of your statement, you can see that you say there,

01:21:10 at 04.15 a.m. the fire brigade asked me to arrange for a dangerous structures officer

01:21:16 to attend the site as there were concerns regarding the stability of the tower.

01:21:21 Now, 04.15 is before the second tactical coordination meeting took place.

01:21:33 Yes.

01:21:34 And we have that starting at 04.34 and I'll come back to that.

01:21:38 If you can go to your note please, RBK00029036 page 1,

01:21:47 we can see under item 9, or against item 9, DS rec.

01:21:56 Recl.

01:21:57 Recl.

01:21:58 Recl.

01:21:59 Blue light 16.15.

01:22:02 Now first of all, 16.15, was that an error for?

01:22:06 That is definitely.

01:22:07 Now, what led you to write the time, let's assume it's 04.15,

01:22:13 what led you to write the time of 04.15 when you put that down?

01:22:19 What made me put that down, I don't know.

01:22:21 Do you think it's right or do you think it's wrong?

01:22:23 I think 04.15 was approximately the right time.

01:22:26 Okay. Now, let's just follow that through a little bit.

01:22:29 Were you aware prior to 04.15 that there were serious concerns

01:22:34 regarding the structural integrity of the building?

01:22:37 There was mention about on the corners of an earlier meeting

01:22:43 but I only said that to be the stuff that was on the walls on the outside.

01:22:51 And that, at the earlier meeting, that's the first silver TCM?

01:22:57 Yeah.

01:22:58 Which started at 03.20 and ended at 03.32 or thereabouts?

01:23:02 Yes.

01:23:03 And if you look at your own note, I think you say under item 6,

01:23:09 fall items up from the end of that unsavable building pot collapse.

01:23:14 Is that your record?

01:23:15 That is my record.

01:23:16 I see.

01:23:17 So that's the first time when you realised, is this right,

01:23:19 that there was a concern regarding the structural integrity of the building?

01:23:23 Yes.

01:23:24 Right.

01:23:25 And just for the record, that ties into the Andy Rowe log

01:23:29 at page 2 of NET0005404 and I'm not going to show you that.

01:23:34 Now, were you aware prior to the start of that first silver meeting, 03.20,

01:23:43 whether there was a request for a dangerous structure engineer?

01:23:50 No, I wasn't.

01:23:51 You weren't.

01:23:52 Can I just show you one or two entries in a document

01:23:54 you will most likely not have seen before,

01:23:57 which is the short incident log produced by the LFB,

01:24:02 which is MET00013830.

01:24:18 And if I can ask you please to go in that document to page 22.

01:24:22 And look at the time mark of 02.17.36.

01:24:26 Do you think it might be good to tell Mr. Layden what this document is

01:24:30 so he understands the question?

01:24:31 Yes.

01:24:32 I will certainly do that, Mr. Chairman, of course.

01:24:35 This is the short incident log produced by or created by the London Fire Brigade,

01:24:40 which is a log created from a longer log,

01:24:44 which records all the messages that were sent to the building,

01:24:49 which is a log which records all the messages coming through the control room,

01:24:55 supposed to record all the messages coming through the control room,

01:24:58 the LFB control room, on the night of the fire.

01:25:01 And we can see the time marks on the left-hand column,

01:25:06 and in the second column from the left we've got the person

01:25:08 who put the message into the system,

01:25:11 and then what kind of message it is.

01:25:14 And at 02.17.36, SAD, who is Sharon Darby, the radio operator,

01:25:19 puts in a service request, EMG CU8 request,

01:25:24 and that's the command unit,

01:25:26 requests dangerous structure engineer,

01:25:28 gas and electricity board, and local authority liaison officer.

01:25:34 My question is, were you aware from the moment you arrived

01:25:40 at the incident ground that requests had been made

01:25:43 for a dangerous structures engineer?

01:25:46 No, not that I recall.

01:25:52 Did you discuss a dangerous structures engineer at your first

01:25:56 or during your first briefing when you arrived at the command unit?

01:26:00 No.

01:26:01 If I can ask you just to look at a second message,

01:26:05 which is page 23, it's the same question,

01:26:09 just to pick all these up,

01:26:10 page 23, time mark of 02.38.21,

01:26:18 there's another service request at that time,

01:26:21 marked AG, which we believe is Angie Gotts,

01:26:25 a control room officer at Stratford on the night,

01:26:28 and it says again, CU8 request dangerous structure engineer,

01:26:32 so she's recording that the command unit was calling

01:26:35 for a dangerous structure engineer.

01:26:36 Were you aware at around that time

01:26:38 that a dangerous structure engineer had been called for?

01:26:40 No.

01:26:41 Then again, page 24,

01:26:48 time mark of 03.15.32,

01:26:54 two-thirds of the way down the page,

01:26:58 03.15.32, SAD, Sharon Darby again, Key, EMG, CU8,

01:27:03 request urgent attendance of dangerous structure engineer

01:27:06 and stress this is a matter of urgency and priority.

01:27:09 Now we know that you are on the incident ground at this time,

01:27:14 you've had your first briefing some 25 minutes or so before

01:27:20 because we saw the body worn video clip.

01:27:23 Do you remember being told or having any discussion

01:27:26 to the effect that the command unit was requesting

01:27:30 urgent attendance of a dangerous structure engineer?

01:27:33 No.

01:27:36 So is that right?

01:27:37 So is it right that nobody involved you in that discussion

01:27:42 even though you were standing there?

01:27:44 No, they didn't.

01:27:45 Okay.

01:27:46 Now we have a call

01:27:51 recorded at, and I'll just show you the transcript,

01:27:55 it's LFB.

01:27:59 All right, okay.

01:28:00 All right.

01:28:01 So we have a call,

01:28:02 let me try it this way.

01:28:08 Do you know or have any knowledge of any other call

01:28:12 made by the control room to RBKC at 03.17

01:28:18 asking for a dangerous structures engineer?

01:28:21 No.

01:28:22 Right.

01:28:23 Now if we can go to the next slide,

01:28:32 back then to the first meeting

01:28:36 of silver at 03.20,

01:28:43 can I just put this question to you?

01:28:45 Do you remember hearing during that first silver meeting,

01:28:49 03.20 to 03.32 or thereabouts,

01:28:52 that a dangerous structures engineer

01:28:54 had been already requested by the LFB?

01:28:58 No.

01:28:59 Okay.

01:29:00 So I'm just going to show you a very short clip

01:29:03 of body worn video footage

01:29:06 which shows Andy Rowe, the incident commander,

01:29:09 and you present during that meeting.

01:29:11 It runs from a time mark of 03.27.05

01:29:19 as adjusted and it runs to 03.27.22 as adjusted.

01:29:25 If I can ask for that to be played please.

01:29:27 It's INQ quintuple 0530.

01:29:31 I should just say there are no pictures

01:29:33 of the exterior of the tower.

01:29:35 This is all inside the command unit.

01:29:36 This is all inside the command unit, Mr Chairman,

01:29:37 and I think we've already seen this.

01:29:43 So you can see it, and there's a danger of collapse,

01:29:45 so we've got a clear limit of exploitation

01:29:46 at the front of the building.

01:29:47 So where the green is, really,

01:29:49 you wipe most of this green out.

01:29:52 This whole corner of the building here

01:29:54 is in danger of collapse, we think.

01:29:56 We've asked for danger structure,

01:29:57 and it actually is played in the office.

01:29:59 So your people need to be very...

01:30:02 Did you hear him say that?

01:30:03 Yes, I did.

01:30:04 Do you recall hearing him say that at the time?

01:30:07 I don't.

01:30:08 You don't? Okay.

01:30:09 You can see yourself in that clip.

01:30:11 Yes, I can.

01:30:12 You don't remember him saying that?

01:30:13 All right.

01:30:17 Does it follow, then,

01:30:18 given that you didn't hear him say

01:30:20 that a DSE had already been asked for,

01:30:25 does it follow that you didn't follow up after this call

01:30:27 as to where the DSE was at that stage?

01:30:30 Correct.

01:30:31 I see.

01:30:33 Now, we do have a call,

01:30:38 or rather, we do have a note of a call

01:30:40 that you made to David Kerry.

01:30:41 Can I ask you to look at the David Kerry log

01:30:43 at RBK00028849?

01:30:55 And go, please, to page three of that document.

01:31:05 And you can see that on the left-hand side,

01:31:08 item 10, 0337,

01:31:11 telephone call from Lalo, you see, Nick Layton,

01:31:15 following a silver meeting at the scene.

01:31:19 100 people trapped on various floors,

01:31:21 100 people trapped on various floors,

01:31:22 100 people trapped on various floors,

01:31:23 100 people trapped on various floors,

01:31:25 one corner in danger of collapse.

01:31:28 So it looks like you had picked up the fact

01:31:31 that there was, at that stage,

01:31:34 one corner of a building in danger of collapse,

01:31:36 and we've seen that from your own note, pot collapse.

01:31:40 Did that, my question is,

01:31:41 did that not signal to you at that time

01:31:44 that you did need a dangerous structures engineer urgently?

01:31:48 Yes, it should have done.

01:31:50 It should have done?

01:31:51 It should have done.

01:31:52 But did it?

01:31:53 No.

01:31:54 Why is that?

01:31:55 I can't answer.

01:31:56 Okay.

01:32:01 So coming back to your witness statement

01:32:02 of paragraph 25, if I can,

01:32:08 when you say that...

01:32:10 I'm sorry.

01:32:21 The London, the fire brigade asked,

01:32:23 at 0415, the fire brigade asked me to arrange

01:32:25 for a dangerous structures officer.

01:32:29 Can you help with the circumstances

01:32:33 surrounding that request at that time?

01:32:36 I believe I was outside the control vehicle,

01:32:39 and fire officers came in and said they needed

01:32:44 a dangerous structures officer as soon as possible,

01:32:47 and they did turn and tell me that if necessary,

01:32:50 they could provide a blue light escort

01:32:54 for the officer to get there quickly.

01:32:57 Right.

01:33:06 Now...

01:33:12 In the same log at page 5...

01:33:17 I'm sorry, I'll have to ask you to jump around.

01:33:19 If you go back to David Kerry's log, please,

01:33:21 and go to page 5 with that,

01:33:25 this is item 18.

01:33:36 So this is RBK00028849.

01:33:40 Item 18, page 5, please.

01:33:46 Item 18, with a time mark of 0418,

01:33:50 David Kerry records a telephone call from Lalo Nick Layton,

01:33:54 LFB, LFB, LFB, LFB, LFB, LFB, LFB,

01:33:59 LFB, LFB, LFB, LFB, LFB, LFB, LFB, LFB, LFB,

01:34:03 LFB, LFB, LFB, LFB, LFB, LFB, LFB,

01:34:06 and LFB had called for a dangerous structures officer

01:34:09 to attend and needed him urgently.

01:34:11 MPS were offering to provide blue lights transport

01:34:14 to get the DSO to the scene.

01:34:19 Do you recall the discussion that you had with him?

01:34:22 Yes, I do.

01:34:23 You do?

01:34:24 Is that an accurate recollection,

01:34:26 or record of what you recall of that discussion with him?

01:34:29 Yes.

01:34:30 Okay.

01:34:31 And that's 0418, so shortly after 0415,

01:34:33 as you recorded in your note.

01:34:35 Do you remember when you had the discussion with the LFB

01:34:39 about needing a DSE at around 0415, as you put it,

01:34:43 did the person or the officer from the LFB tell you

01:34:47 that the LFB had been calling for one for some time?

01:34:54 I couldn't say it with accuracy, sir.

01:34:56 Did you get an impression from the conversation

01:34:59 with the LFB officer that they were frustrated

01:35:02 that a DSE engineer had not come yet?

01:35:05 I got the sense of urgency that they were offering

01:35:08 the minute they offered the blue light to escort,

01:35:11 so from that point aspect, yes.

01:35:15 And then,

01:35:20 having had the discussion with David Kerry

01:35:23 and told him about the call for a DSE,

01:35:26 did you yourself go about getting or finding

01:35:30 a DSE, or did you leave that to David Kerry?

01:35:32 I left that with David Kerry.

01:35:33 Right.

01:35:34 And then he says in his emergency event log sheet

01:35:36 on the right-hand column, 0430,

01:35:40 I telephoned and spoke to the dangerous structures officer,

01:35:43 Amir Fardoui, he was at the Corden,

01:35:46 and then 0431, I telephoned the lay loan,

01:35:49 Nathan, and informed him that the DSO was at the Corden.

01:35:52 First of all, can you help me, is there a difference

01:35:54 between a DSE and a DSO, dangerous structures engineer

01:35:57 and dangerous structures officer?

01:35:59 Not to my knowledge.

01:36:00 Right.

01:36:01 Now, when you spoke to David Kerry

01:36:06 at 0418, did David Kerry tell you

01:36:10 that a dangerous structures engineer

01:36:11 had already been requested?

01:36:13 0418, no.

01:36:15 Right.

01:36:19 Do you remember when Amir Fardoui arrived at the Corden?

01:36:24 I'd say somewhere around 0430.

01:36:28 Did you discover that from David Kerry?

01:36:30 No, no.

01:36:31 When he told you, or did you know that before that?

01:36:35 I actually saw, I couldn't remember, Amir Fardoui,

01:36:41 one of the other building control officers I saw at the time.

01:36:45 Right, now, I'm very sorry, Mr. Layton,

01:36:48 you're going to have to repeat that answer

01:36:49 for the transcript, please.

01:36:51 Okay.

01:36:52 Although I couldn't remember the name of Amir Fardoui,

01:36:55 and there was another officer who I knew belonged

01:36:58 to building control, had arrived at around about that time.

01:37:04 So your recollection is that someone who was not Amir Fardoui

01:37:08 had arrived from building control at that time?

01:37:10 I'm trying to actually think of his name,

01:37:12 unfortunately it's gone blank.

01:37:14 But yes, I saw a familiar officer

01:37:17 from building control at the site.

01:37:19 Right.

01:37:20 I saw the two people.

01:37:21 At the time, Amir Fardoui, I couldn't remember his name.

01:37:24 So you did see Amir Fardoui, but couldn't remember his name?

01:37:27 At that time, yes.

01:37:28 At that time, and you say at that time, about 4.30,

01:37:30 is that right?

01:37:31 Approximately, yes.

01:37:32 And you say you also saw somebody else

01:37:34 from building control?

01:37:35 John.

01:37:36 I'm trying to think.

01:37:39 The other person's name is in my statement.

01:37:42 Is that John Allen?

01:37:43 John Allen.

01:37:44 Right.

01:37:45 Where on the cordon did you see those two individuals?

01:37:49 By the incident control vehicle.

01:37:51 Were they together?

01:37:52 Yes, they were.

01:37:53 Do you know how long they'd been there?

01:37:55 No.

01:37:56 Did you take steps to tell the LFB

01:37:59 that the DSE or DSEs were not there?

01:38:01 No, we were already talking to the LFB.

01:38:03 Right.

01:38:09 And this was, you say, about 4.30?

01:38:11 Approximately, yes.

01:38:12 Now, can I just ask you about a document

01:38:17 that is not yours, but nonetheless is a record

01:38:20 of the night?

01:38:21 It's the row log we've looked at before.

01:38:23 This is MET Quadruple Zero 5404.

01:38:28 And look, please, at page four at the top of that document.

01:38:32 It's the one that's on page four.

01:38:34 It's the one that's on page four.

01:38:36 It's the one that's on page four.

01:38:38 It's the one that's on page four.

01:38:40 And look, please, at page four at the top of that document.

01:38:48 At 04.51, 04.51, top of the screen,

01:38:53 it says structural surveyor in attendance at leisure center

01:38:56 and is to make decision on integrity of building.

01:39:02 Is that a reference to one or other

01:39:05 of Amir Fadoui or John Allen?

01:39:07 That is.

01:39:08 Right.

01:39:09 And I'm just wondering if you could

01:39:11 record with your recollection about the presence

01:39:13 of the structural surveyor in terms of timing.

01:39:16 I would have said it was earlier, personally.

01:39:18 All right.

01:39:20 And then if you go to 05.32, halfway down the page,

01:39:25 at page four, the logist has written in the second line,

01:39:29 corridor to protect egress and entry,

01:39:35 and inbound John Allen structural engineer.

01:39:39 Entry, sir.

01:39:41 I see.

01:39:42 So entry into the building rather than entry

01:39:45 onto the incident ground.

01:39:47 I would say entry into the building, sir.

01:39:49 And I'm asking you to interpret a document that isn't yours.

01:39:51 I appreciate it.

01:39:52 But your recollection is that John Allen wasn't,

01:39:54 as it were, inbound to the site.

01:39:56 He was there.

01:39:57 He was there.

01:39:58 Right.

01:40:02 And your clear recollection is that they were both there

01:40:04 together, both Amir Fadoui and John Allen.

01:40:06 When I saw them, they were both there together.

01:40:08 Right.

01:40:10 Did you have a discussion with John Allen at the time?

01:40:13 No, because he was actually dealing with the LFB at the time.

01:40:16 I see.

01:40:19 Now, can I...?

01:40:38 Can I ask you please to look at a video,

01:40:48 clip of body-worn video from the second TCM,

01:40:54 the second tactical coordination meeting,

01:40:58 that started at 0434, according to the row log.

01:41:05 And this is clip INQ531, so quintuple 0531,

01:41:11 which has an adjusted time of 0439.30 to 0439.55.

01:41:18 So this is taken within that second meeting,

01:41:21 second silver meeting.

01:41:23 If I could just play that to you.

01:41:26 Harder, my friend.

01:41:27 Just don't blip.

01:41:28 I need that to die.

01:41:29 So what I have said is if we can find you,

01:41:31 can we get products to be more effective?

01:41:33 If we can find them, can we get products to be more effective?

01:41:36 I really want to hear...

01:41:37 That's the word that's already gone back there.

01:41:39 I don't think I can contact any of you.

01:41:41 That's probably the most important thing

01:41:43 you can do for me, actually, because...

01:41:45 I've been asking for the last two hours,

01:41:47 so I want them here now to make the structural decision

01:41:49 on that building for me.

01:41:50 So I've said to soon make contact with them

01:41:52 and they will let you know.

01:41:53 It just gets a collective score of 30-40.

01:41:55 Police.

01:41:57 Now...

01:41:59 First of all, do you...

01:42:01 You can hear the commissioner clearly saying on that.

01:42:03 I've been asking...

01:42:04 I couldn't make out all the conversation,

01:42:06 but she was clearly asking for something

01:42:08 that she'd been asking for for two hours.

01:42:10 Yes.

01:42:11 And to the best of your recollection,

01:42:13 is that right, that she had been asking for a DSE

01:42:15 for the past two hours?

01:42:17 I didn't know that before that, but yes.

01:42:20 Right.

01:42:21 Now...

01:42:22 You also can hear...

01:42:29 Well, perhaps you can't hear, actually,

01:42:31 what you're saying.

01:42:32 Perhaps we could play that again

01:42:33 just to try to pick up what you're saying on that.

01:42:40 On that clip.

01:42:41 Pardon my French, don't be...

01:42:43 I need that.

01:42:44 Sir, I have said, if we can find her,

01:42:46 can we get colleagues to blue light the middle?

01:42:48 The DSE, I really want to hear.

01:42:50 That's the word that's already come back out.

01:42:52 I don't think I can take any of you.

01:42:54 That's probably the most important thing

01:42:56 you can do for me, actually, because...

01:42:58 I've been asking for the last two hours,

01:43:00 so I won't be able to make a structural decision

01:43:02 that I can't make out.

01:43:03 I'm not going to be able to make out.

01:43:05 I'm not going to be able to make out.

01:43:07 I'm not going to be able to make out.

01:43:09 I'm not going to be able to make out.

01:43:11 I'm not going to be able to make out.

01:43:13 So I've said, as soon as we make contact,

01:43:15 we'll let you know.

01:43:16 Just get some colleagues to blue light the middle.

01:43:18 Please.

01:43:19 Now, as I say, this is a time mark of 0439...

01:43:22 30 to 0439...

01:43:24 0439.55.

01:43:26 So after 0430, it looks from that...

01:43:29 Help me with this.

01:43:30 It looks from that as if at that point

01:43:32 you didn't know that the DSEs

01:43:35 were at the cordon present.

01:43:37 Yeah.

01:43:38 Would that be fair?

01:43:39 That would be fair.

01:43:40 So your first discovery that they were there

01:43:43 must have been after 0415,

01:43:45 indeed after 0430...

01:43:47 After that meeting.

01:43:48 And after this meeting.

01:43:50 So the question is, why didn't you tell the meeting

01:43:53 what you'd been told by David Kerry,

01:43:56 which was that the DSE or DSO was at the cordon?

01:44:03 I can't answer.

01:44:04 Right. OK.

01:44:11 Now...

01:44:19 If I go take you back to the row log,

01:44:23 MET quadruple 05404

01:44:28 and page three of that, Mr. Layton,

01:44:30 we can see that this is, again,

01:44:33 a note of the meeting,

01:44:37 second tactical coordination meeting

01:44:40 if we can just have that blown up a bit.

01:44:46 And it starts,

01:44:48 commissioner introduces and establishes priorities

01:44:50 in AR absence, safety of building,

01:44:54 LAS access and egress being protected

01:44:56 by right shields, commissioner,

01:44:58 dangerous structures engineer is en route.

01:45:01 And then...

01:45:02 Have we got the right bit up on the screen?

01:45:06 We have, I haven't spotted it.

01:45:08 No, it's my fault.

01:45:09 I'm sorry, I'm working from a document.

01:45:11 You can scroll down, please, to 0434.

01:45:15 That's it.

01:45:17 0434 tactical coordination meeting,

01:45:20 and I'll just pick this up,

01:45:21 four lines or four entries down,

01:45:23 the commissioner says,

01:45:24 dangerous structures engineer is en route.

01:45:28 And then...

01:45:31 About halfway down that main block of text,

01:45:33 local authority, it says,

01:45:36 the rest centre's established on Shepherd's Bush Green,

01:45:39 DSE to be blue-lighted in

01:45:41 as we've been asking for them for two hours.

01:45:47 Again, is that an accurate record

01:45:51 as far as you can recollect?

01:45:53 I have not been asking for no due to survey for two hours.

01:45:59 Right.

01:46:00 It looks as if when the commissioner says,

01:46:03 dangerous structure engineer is en route,

01:46:05 DSE to be blue-lighted in,

01:46:07 it looks as if their impression

01:46:09 is that the dangerous structures engineers are not there.

01:46:11 Yes.

01:46:12 Right.

01:46:14 And you don't say,

01:46:15 no, no, they're here at the Corden.

01:46:17 You're not recorded as having said that.

01:46:20 So does that indicate that you didn't tell them

01:46:22 that they were at the Corden?

01:46:23 No.

01:46:24 OK.

01:46:32 When the commissioner said,

01:46:34 that she's been asking,

01:46:35 the LFB had been calling for a DSE for the past two hours,

01:46:39 was that the first time that you heard that that was so?

01:46:44 For the two hours, yes.

01:46:45 OK.

01:46:46 Now I'm going to turn to a different topic,

01:46:48 which is lists of residents.

01:46:51 If you can go, please,

01:46:52 to paragraph 26 of your statement on page 8.

01:47:05 You say there,

01:47:06 the next silver meeting was at 0430 a.m.

01:47:10 My briefing included informing command

01:47:12 that Harrow Club Rest Centre was now being opened.

01:47:15 I recalled that it was also the 0430 a.m. meeting

01:47:18 that I was asked by the fire brigade

01:47:20 for a list of all residents at Grenfell Tower.

01:47:24 Now, Mr. Leighton,

01:47:25 can I just ask you something about that?

01:47:31 If we can look at your own log,

01:47:34 please, at page 3.

01:47:44 I'm so sorry.

01:47:45 Your log at page 1,

01:47:46 which is RBK00029036.

01:47:49 I apologise, I've given you the wrong reference.

01:47:51 RBK00029036.

01:47:57 You can see...

01:47:58 ..under item 11, 0430,

01:48:04 silver meat,

01:48:06 multi-casualties,

01:48:09 8 to 10 PI...

01:48:11 I'm afraid I'm unable to read that next word.

01:48:17 Can you help us with that?

01:48:20 Are you all right?

01:48:22 Mr. Leighton, would you like a break?

01:48:24 Before we put you on the floor.

01:48:26 Yeah.

01:48:27 Yeah? OK.

01:48:29 You can go to the usher,

01:48:31 and we'll have a five-minute break.

01:48:33 OK.

01:48:44 All right, we'll break until 11.15.

01:48:46 Cheers.

01:48:56 Thank you.

01:49:26 Thank you.

01:49:56 Thank you.

01:50:26 Thank you.

01:50:56 Thank you.

01:51:26 Thank you.

01:51:56 Thank you.

01:52:26 Thank you.

01:52:56 Thank you.

01:53:26 Thank you.

01:53:56 Thank you.

01:54:26 Thank you.

01:54:56 Thank you.

01:55:26 Thank you.

01:55:56 Thank you.

01:56:26 Would you like Mr Leighton to come back in, please?

01:56:57 All right, now, you're feeling all right to carry on, Mr Leighton?

01:56:59 Yes, sir.

01:57:00 Now, if you get to a stage when you feel you need a break,

01:57:02 don't hesitate to indicate, all right?

01:57:04 Yes.

01:57:05 Yes, Mr Leighton.

01:57:09 Mr Leighton, thank you for coming back to us.

01:57:11 Just see how we go with this.

01:57:13 Can I ask you to be shown again,

01:57:15 R-B-K,

01:57:16 00028849 at page three?

01:57:27 I'm sorry, that is my fault.

01:57:29 It's...

01:57:30 That is the Kerry log.

01:57:32 R-B-K, 00029036.

01:57:38 29036.

01:57:40 That's it now.

01:57:41 We were looking at your note of the meeting,

01:57:45 item 11 on the left-hand side,

01:57:48 0430 Silvermeat,

01:57:50 and you were...

01:57:51 We'd got to item 12.

01:57:56 Against line 12, 8-10 PI.

01:57:59 I was going to ask you if you wouldn't mind reading to me

01:58:02 what you'd written there, if you can.

01:58:04 8-10 P1s conveyed.

01:58:07 They were prior to one,

01:58:10 casualties that had been conveyed to hospital.

01:58:12 Right.

01:58:13 I'm sorry, I'm so sorry to ask you to have to repeat that.

01:58:17 Conveyed, and then it looks like...

01:58:19 Well, I can't...

01:58:20 Can you read the next word?

01:58:21 Yeah.

01:58:22 Treatment of 2 P1s at site.

01:58:26 I see.

01:58:28 20 P3s which were people being treated in Nookhan,

01:58:35 around the tower.

01:58:36 Yeah.

01:58:37 I see.

01:58:39 So, conveyed, treated.

01:58:41 Conveyed was already taken away to hospital.

01:58:45 And then 13, bus Bramley Trans P3.

01:58:49 Yeah.

01:58:51 And then press in one location,

01:58:54 next 0550.

01:58:56 And the reason for my taking you through that

01:58:59 was to really point out what's not there,

01:59:02 and that is that there's no record in there

01:59:05 of any request for a list of residents.

01:59:08 Is that right?

01:59:10 Correct.

01:59:12 And so that's why I'm asking you,

01:59:15 when you go back to your statement at paragraph 26, Mr. Laten,

01:59:18 if you can just look at that,

01:59:20 you say,

01:59:22 I recall that it was also...

01:59:25 If you could just have that blown up, please.

01:59:27 I recall that it was also at the 0430 meeting

01:59:30 that I was asked by the Flyer Brigade

01:59:32 for a list of all residents at Grenfell Tower.

01:59:35 What was it when you did your statement

01:59:37 that prompted the recollection that it was at that meeting

01:59:40 that you were asked for a list of residents?

01:59:43 Because I had to go to the next meeting

01:59:46 with a negative response back to...

01:59:50 the meeting about getting any information on the residents.

01:59:56 I know that there were two meetings.

02:00:01 I was due to attend the 7 o'clock meeting,

02:00:04 which I couldn't attend,

02:00:06 and Mike Rumble attended that in my place.

02:00:10 And when I handed over to Mike,

02:00:12 I had to tell him that I still had not got the information.

02:00:16 The next meeting was going to be at 0550,

02:00:24 as you say from your note.

02:00:26 I'm not sure I understood your last answer.

02:00:29 My question really is,

02:00:31 given that there's nothing in your contemporaneous note

02:00:33 about being asked for a list of residents

02:00:35 at the second meeting,

02:00:37 what was it that prompted your recollection

02:00:39 and your statement that you were asked

02:00:41 for a list of residents at that meeting?

02:00:43 As I said, I know for a fact

02:00:46 that we were going to go to two meetings

02:00:49 where we hadn't provided the information

02:00:52 that was requested.

02:00:54 That was the 0550 meeting

02:00:56 and would be the 7 o'clock meeting.

02:01:00 So it was my recollection

02:01:03 that it was approximately 0430

02:01:05 that I was asked,

02:01:06 because I knew I was going to two meetings

02:01:09 where I was not providing the information

02:01:10 I was requested.

02:01:12 Now, is it possible

02:01:16 that you had this recollection

02:01:18 of being asked for this list of residents

02:01:21 prior to or outside

02:01:24 that second tactical coordination meeting?

02:01:27 It is possible.

02:01:37 You then say in paragraph 27,

02:01:40 having received this request,

02:01:42 I was aware that this information

02:01:43 was likely to be with the TMO,

02:01:46 as they were the managing agents for the tower.

02:01:49 I therefore passed this request to Robert Black

02:01:51 and asked him to obtain the information urgently.

02:01:58 Do you remember whether you asked Robert Black

02:02:00 to get that information

02:02:02 before or after the second

02:02:05 tactical coordination meeting?

02:02:10 I can't say for definite.

02:02:16 Did you ask for that information

02:02:18 immediately it was asked for

02:02:20 of you by the IFB?

02:02:21 Yes, I did.

02:02:23 And where was Robert Black standing

02:02:25 when you asked him for a list of residents?

02:02:28 He was outside probably about three foot,

02:02:33 three to four feet in front of the

02:02:36 incident control vehicle

02:02:38 on the side of the road.

02:02:43 And what did he do?

02:02:45 He made a phone call straight away.

02:02:47 Do you know who he called?

02:02:48 No.

02:02:50 Do you know what the result of that call was?

02:02:52 The result was I didn't get the information.

02:02:54 Did he report to you that he had been

02:02:56 unable to get the information?

02:02:57 No, not until I was chasing him

02:02:59 for the information.

02:03:01 Right.

02:03:02 Let's just move on with the same topic.

02:03:04 At paragraph 28 of your statement,

02:03:06 middle of page eight of your statement

02:03:08 to the inquiry, you say,

02:03:10 the next silver meeting was at 5.50.

02:03:13 Before I went to the next meeting,

02:03:15 I asked Robert Black whether he had

02:03:17 managed to get the list of the

02:03:19 Grenfell Tower residents.

02:03:20 However, he did not have this

02:03:22 information and he made another call.

02:03:26 Why did you ask for this information

02:03:29 from Robert Black at that point?

02:03:31 Because I was getting ready to go

02:03:33 to the next silver meeting

02:03:35 and it was just before I went there

02:03:37 so I wanted to get an update.

02:03:39 How sure are you that this wasn't

02:03:41 the first time that you'd asked Robert

02:03:43 Black for that information?

02:03:45 Certain.

02:03:47 Certain.

02:03:49 And where was Robert Black when you

02:03:51 made this request?

02:03:53 On Bowmore Road, I'd say about

02:03:55 three or four feet in, again,

02:03:58 in front of the fire control vehicle.

02:04:01 So this is the same place as the

02:04:03 previous request?

02:04:04 I met him in the same place most times.

02:04:07 Right.

02:04:08 And what did...

02:04:10 You say he made another call.

02:04:12 Do you know who he called?

02:04:14 No, I do not.

02:04:15 Were you standing next to him when

02:04:17 he was making that call?

02:04:18 I was standing in front of him.

02:04:20 What was the upshot of that call?

02:04:22 The upshot was asking somebody for

02:04:24 the details of who he called,

02:04:26 I do not know.

02:04:28 Did you ask him...

02:04:32 Well, did he say whether he was

02:04:34 going to get it?

02:04:35 He just said that he hadn't received

02:04:37 the information, so he made another

02:04:39 phone call.

02:04:40 Right.

02:04:43 Did he explain why?

02:04:45 No, he didn't.

02:04:46 Did you ask him?

02:04:48 Yes.

02:04:49 What did you ask him?

02:04:50 I didn't get an answer.

02:04:51 Right.

02:04:54 Now, we then go to the third TCM

02:04:57 tactical coordination meeting,

02:05:00 and you have the time to

02:05:03 have the time of that at 05.50.

02:05:10 If you go, please, to page five

02:05:14 of the row log, MET quadruple 05.404.

02:05:24 I'll just wait to get that for you.

02:05:26 At 05.50, it says,

02:05:30 tactical coordination meeting.

02:05:37 And then there's quite a lot of

02:05:40 detail in there.

02:05:42 In particular, can I show you

02:05:44 where it says at the end of the

02:05:46 first chunk of text, 115 unaccounted

02:05:48 for, very difficult to establish

02:05:50 exact numbers due to self-evac.

02:05:54 And then a reference to a casualty

02:05:56 bureau being opened.

02:05:58 We can't see anywhere in this

02:06:01 record of that meeting any

02:06:03 reference to a list of

02:06:05 Grenfell Tower residents.

02:06:12 Are you...

02:06:13 How clear are you in your mind?

02:06:15 I'm convinced that there was a

02:06:17 request for a list of residents.

02:06:19 I went back to that meeting.

02:06:21 I had to inform them.

02:06:22 Unfortunately, I had not got

02:06:24 the information.

02:06:26 And at paragraph 29 of your

02:06:28 statement, you say, you reported

02:06:30 to that meeting that the list of

02:06:33 Grenfell Tower...

02:06:34 I'll just go back.

02:06:35 I'll just show it to you on the

02:06:36 screen, Mr. Mason.

02:06:38 29, I reported at the 05.50

02:06:40 silver meeting that the list of

02:06:42 Grenfell Tower residents was

02:06:43 still not available.

02:06:44 And I assured that I was pressing

02:06:46 to get this information urgently.

02:06:56 I recall that the fire brigade

02:06:58 were unhappy that the

02:06:59 information hadn't arrived yet.

02:07:01 And after the meeting finished,

02:07:02 I then went back to Robert Black

02:07:04 and relayed this to him.

02:07:11 And how certain are you of what

02:07:13 you're saying here in your

02:07:14 statement?

02:07:15 100%.

02:07:16 100%.

02:07:26 Now, can I ask you to look at

02:07:32 your own note of this meeting,

02:07:34 RBK00029036, page 2.

02:07:50 And if you can turn on the

02:07:51 screen to page 2, there it is.

02:07:52 Now, this meeting is just below

02:07:54 halfway down, 05.50.

02:07:57 Just scanning your eyes down,

02:07:59 your record of that meeting,

02:08:01 which I think finishes at the

02:08:03 bottom of the page, which says

02:08:05 next 07.10 or 07 something.

02:08:10 We can't see any indication

02:08:12 there of your recording a

02:08:14 discussion about a list of

02:08:16 residents.

02:08:17 Am I right about that?

02:08:19 It's at the very bottom.

02:08:22 Number of all...

02:08:24 Oh, no, sir.

02:08:25 No, it isn't.

02:08:27 So, do you know why you didn't

02:08:30 record the discussion of which

02:08:32 you're now 100% certain took

02:08:34 place about a list of residents

02:08:35 at that meeting?

02:08:36 No.

02:08:37 But nonetheless, me having

02:08:39 shown you, or I having shown

02:08:40 you, your own record of that

02:08:42 meeting, you're still 100%

02:08:43 certain that you raised it at

02:08:45 that meeting?

02:08:46 I am.

02:08:47 Is there any reason why you

02:08:48 didn't record that?

02:08:49 I can't explain it.

02:08:51 Now, did you have a

02:08:54 discussion after this meeting

02:08:56 with David Kerry about obtaining

02:08:58 a list of residents?

02:09:00 No.

02:09:01 Why is that?

02:09:02 I went straight to Robert Black.

02:09:04 The council, I didn't think,

02:09:07 had the full list of residents

02:09:09 as we were not managing the

02:09:10 properties.

02:09:12 Do you...

02:09:18 Right.

02:09:19 And did you have any thoughts

02:09:21 at the time about how hard it

02:09:22 could be to get a list of

02:09:24 residents of this building?

02:09:26 Personally, I thought it should

02:09:28 be straightforward.

02:09:36 Was the information that you

02:09:38 were asking for ever made

02:09:40 available to you before you

02:09:42 left the scene at, you say,

02:09:44 7 o'clock a.m.?

02:09:45 No.

02:09:46 Did you think anybody else

02:09:47 would have this information

02:09:48 other than the TMO?

02:09:50 No, I think it would be

02:09:51 solely with the TMO.

02:09:57 Going back to paragraph 29

02:10:00 of your statement,

02:10:03 you say, in the middle

02:10:05 of that paragraph,

02:10:10 after the meeting finished,

02:10:11 I then went back to Robert

02:10:13 Black and relayed this to him

02:10:16 and asked Robert again

02:10:17 if he had received

02:10:18 the information.

02:10:19 He hadn't,

02:10:20 and he made another call,

02:10:22 but when I checked with him

02:10:23 before I left the scene

02:10:24 at 7 a.m.,

02:10:25 he still hadn't received it

02:10:26 and I passed the matter...

02:10:28 I passed over the matter

02:10:29 to Mike Rumble

02:10:30 so that he could liaise

02:10:31 with Robert.

02:10:32 So just breaking that

02:10:33 down a little bit,

02:10:35 how soon after the meeting

02:10:37 finished did you go back

02:10:38 to Robert Black

02:10:39 and relay what you'd been

02:10:40 told by the LFB to him?

02:10:43 I went probably straight away.

02:10:46 Where was he?

02:10:48 I'm not sure exactly,

02:10:50 but I would have gone

02:10:51 and found him straight away.

02:10:53 I believe he was probably

02:10:54 still somewhere

02:10:55 on Bonewall Street

02:10:58 and I would have spoken

02:10:59 to him.

02:11:00 OK.

02:11:01 And you say,

02:11:03 I asked Robert again

02:11:04 if he'd received the information.

02:11:06 So that would be,

02:11:07 is that on your recollection,

02:11:08 the third time

02:11:09 you'd asked him?

02:11:10 Yes.

02:11:11 And you said

02:11:12 he hadn't

02:11:13 and he made another call.

02:11:15 Yes.

02:11:16 Did he explain to you

02:11:17 why he hadn't?

02:11:18 No.

02:11:19 Were you present

02:11:20 when he made that other call?

02:11:21 I was present

02:11:22 but I wasn't listening.

02:11:24 Right.

02:11:25 And what was the upshot

02:11:26 of that call?

02:11:27 He said he would

02:11:28 get the information to us.

02:11:30 Now, we don't have an end time,

02:11:35 exact end time for that meeting,

02:11:39 but can you recall roughly

02:11:40 when the meeting was?

02:11:42 When that meeting finished

02:11:43 so that we can put a time on

02:11:44 when you had this discussion

02:11:45 with Robert Black?

02:11:47 I would say that meeting

02:11:48 didn't take more than 10,

02:11:50 15 minutes max.

02:11:53 Now, you then say in your statement

02:11:57 as I've just shown you,

02:11:58 when I checked with him

02:11:59 before I left the scene

02:12:00 at 7am,

02:12:01 he still hadn't received it.

02:12:02 How long before you left the scene

02:12:04 do you remember

02:12:05 checking back again

02:12:06 with Robert Black

02:12:07 about what had happened

02:12:08 to the list of residents?

02:12:09 Probably about five minutes

02:12:10 before I left.

02:12:12 Right.

02:12:14 And you say you left at 7am,

02:12:16 so this would be about 6.55

02:12:17 to the best of your knowledge.

02:12:18 Approximately, yes.

02:12:20 Because I needed to brief Mike

02:12:23 of the outstanding issue

02:12:24 of this.

02:12:26 No.

02:12:28 Did you have any contact

02:12:30 with any other members

02:12:31 of the TMO staff

02:12:32 on the night

02:12:33 other than Robert Black?

02:12:34 No.

02:12:37 Were you aware at any stage

02:12:38 of what roles the TMO staff had

02:12:40 within the cordon?

02:12:42 No, I wasn't.

02:12:44 Did you observe

02:12:45 any direct contact

02:12:46 between the TMO staff

02:12:47 and the emergency services?

02:12:50 None at all.

02:12:52 You remember seeing none?

02:12:54 Is that that you remember

02:12:56 seeing none

02:12:57 or that you don't remember

02:12:58 seeing any?

02:12:59 I don't remember seeing

02:13:00 any contact between

02:13:01 the LFB,

02:13:02 the police,

02:13:03 or TMO.

02:13:04 Right.

02:13:05 So there's a bit of a difference.

02:13:06 Can I just put the question

02:13:07 again?

02:13:08 Is it that you do remember

02:13:09 seeing them not having

02:13:10 any contact

02:13:11 or that you don't remember

02:13:12 having contact?

02:13:13 I don't remember them

02:13:14 having any contact whatsoever.

02:13:15 Right.

02:13:17 Can I turn to the subject

02:13:18 of plans?

02:13:20 During your time

02:13:21 at the incident,

02:13:22 did you think

02:13:23 did it occur to you

02:13:24 that the LFB

02:13:25 would be assisted

02:13:26 by having plans

02:13:27 of the layout

02:13:28 of Granfell Tower?

02:13:31 Yes.

02:13:32 At what point

02:13:33 did it occur to you

02:13:34 that they would need plans?

02:13:36 It wasn't immediately.

02:13:38 I know in the building

02:13:40 I'm working

02:13:41 on having plans available

02:13:44 for 5th Brigade,

02:13:46 but no,

02:13:48 I didn't do anything.

02:13:50 Are you aware of

02:13:52 something called

02:13:53 a premises information box?

02:13:55 Yes.

02:13:56 Did you know on the night

02:13:57 whether there was or wasn't

02:13:58 a premises information box

02:13:59 at Granfell Tower?

02:14:01 As far as I'm aware,

02:14:02 if there was,

02:14:03 it wasn't available.

02:14:05 Okay.

02:14:06 When did you first discover

02:14:08 that plans for Granfell Tower

02:14:11 were missing

02:14:12 and were needed?

02:14:14 I can't say with any clarity.

02:14:19 Now, at paragraph 35

02:14:21 of your statement

02:14:22 on page 10,

02:14:27 you say,

02:14:30 at around 7am

02:14:32 I handed over the roll

02:14:33 of Lay Low to Mike Rumble

02:14:34 and I handed him

02:14:35 my note straight log

02:14:37 so that he knew

02:14:38 what had been happening.

02:14:39 Although I was still

02:14:40 duty officer for the rest

02:14:41 of the week,

02:14:42 I was no longer the Lay Low

02:14:43 for Granfell Tower.

02:14:44 At no point prior

02:14:45 to me leaving the site

02:14:46 had I ever been asked

02:14:47 about the layout

02:14:48 of Granfell Tower

02:14:49 or been asked to obtain

02:14:50 any plans for the tower.

02:14:54 Now,

02:14:57 let me just

02:14:58 put something to you.

02:15:00 Inspector Thatcher,

02:15:01 who attended

02:15:03 the silver TCMs,

02:15:05 Tactical Coordination Meetings,

02:15:07 told us in evidence

02:15:08 that his recollection

02:15:09 from those meetings

02:15:10 is that you were asked

02:15:11 by the LFB

02:15:12 for up-to-date plans

02:15:13 for the building.

02:15:16 I cannot recollect

02:15:18 that at all.

02:15:21 And I can play this to you

02:15:23 if you like.

02:15:24 Yes.

02:15:25 His body-worn video footage

02:15:29 shows Andy Rowe,

02:15:33 the incident commander,

02:15:34 saying at the Tactical

02:15:36 Coordination Meeting

02:15:37 at 7.13,

02:15:38 which was after you left,

02:15:40 that he had been asking

02:15:41 for plans for a very long time.

02:15:44 That's what he says.

02:15:45 We can look at it

02:15:46 if you like,

02:15:47 but you weren't there.

02:15:49 My question is,

02:15:50 is he right,

02:15:52 to the best of your knowledge,

02:15:54 that the LFB had been

02:15:55 asking for plans

02:15:56 for a very long time?

02:15:58 If they had,

02:15:59 they weren't made to meet.

02:16:00 Right.

02:16:02 And indeed,

02:16:03 Inspector Thatcher,

02:16:04 who was at that meeting,

02:16:05 said that the LFB

02:16:06 had been asking for plans

02:16:07 from the word go.

02:16:08 Can you comment on that?

02:16:10 No.

02:16:12 Did you...

02:16:16 To be fair to you,

02:16:18 we don't see any record

02:16:20 of that request,

02:16:22 request for plans,

02:16:24 during the first TCM

02:16:26 or the second TCM

02:16:27 or the third TCM.

02:16:29 Did you ever overhear

02:16:31 a request being made

02:16:33 by the LFB for plans?

02:16:35 No.

02:16:39 Now, can I ask you please

02:16:41 to look at the row log,

02:16:43 MET quadruple 05404,

02:16:47 and go please to page five,

02:16:49 middle of that page.

02:16:54 And Mr. Layton,

02:16:55 can I ask you please

02:16:56 to look at the time mark

02:16:58 of 06.13,

02:16:59 if we can just have

02:17:00 that highlighted.

02:17:06 And then this is,

02:17:07 I should just be clear to you,

02:17:09 it looks as if it's outside

02:17:11 the context of silver meetings.

02:17:14 So, but I want to ask you

02:17:16 about it anyway.

02:17:18 DSE, District Surveyor,

02:17:19 could not get high enough.

02:17:20 No floor collapse,

02:17:22 pancake, frame building,

02:17:24 max fire resistance,

02:17:25 four hours,

02:17:26 firefighter shaft,

02:17:27 two hours,

02:17:28 if columns spall,

02:17:29 not saying will collapse,

02:17:30 if no people let it burn,

02:17:31 would attempt to locate plans,

02:17:33 John Allen and then

02:17:34 there's a blanked over detail.

02:17:39 Do you recall ever hearing

02:17:41 a discussion involving

02:17:44 Andy Rowe or any other

02:17:45 LFB officer about an attempt

02:17:48 to locate plans as recorded here?

02:17:50 No.

02:17:53 Were you aware that Robert Black

02:17:55 had emailed a copy of the plans

02:17:57 of the building at 06.16 a.m.

02:18:02 to John Allen?

02:18:03 No.

02:18:07 Would it follow

02:18:08 that you don't know

02:18:09 whether or not John Allen

02:18:10 then handed those to the LFB?

02:18:12 No, I do not.

02:18:14 So this is completely outside

02:18:15 your knowledge, is it?

02:18:16 Yes.

02:18:17 Right.

02:18:18 Now you left and you say

02:18:20 you handed over to Mike Rumble.

02:18:22 Did you give Mike Rumble

02:18:24 a brief, a handover briefing

02:18:26 as to what requests had been made

02:18:28 of you, which was still

02:18:29 outstanding?

02:18:30 Yes, I did.

02:18:31 And can you remember what it was

02:18:32 that was outstanding?

02:18:33 It was the list of residents

02:18:36 for the LFB

02:18:38 and trying to establish

02:18:41 what people were in rest centres.

02:18:45 And did you give any impression

02:18:48 of how urgent it was

02:18:49 for Mike Rumble to keep

02:18:50 following up on the list

02:18:51 of residents?

02:18:52 Yes, I did.

02:18:53 What did you say to him?

02:18:54 Do you remember?

02:18:55 I told him that the LFB

02:18:56 had been asking for this

02:18:57 information for possibly

02:18:59 the last three meetings.

02:19:00 I had not been able

02:19:01 to give it to them.

02:19:03 I said,

02:19:04 I said it will come up

02:19:05 on the next meeting.

02:19:07 Was that a matter of concern

02:19:10 to you at the time?

02:19:11 Yes, it was.

02:19:13 And so far as you know,

02:19:15 Mike Rumble understood

02:19:16 the importance and urgency

02:19:18 of obtaining that information.

02:19:19 Yes.

02:19:25 Yes, thank you very much, Mr Laiton.

02:19:27 I do have one question

02:19:28 just by way of clarification

02:19:30 of something that I want

02:19:31 to get back to.

02:19:32 And it's a subject

02:19:33 we covered right at the start

02:19:34 of your evidence

02:19:35 about when you were first

02:19:37 called by the GDIT.

02:19:39 It's really a timing point.

02:19:41 Can I ask, please,

02:19:42 that the witness is shown

02:19:44 MET00023294,

02:19:48 23294,

02:19:51 which is the CAD.

02:19:53 We saw CAD 482.

02:19:56 And I'll explain

02:19:57 to you what this is.

02:19:58 And I think it's a very

02:20:00 good point.

02:20:01 I'll explain to you

02:20:02 what this is.

02:20:03 And that's the first page

02:20:05 of this document.

02:20:06 What this is,

02:20:07 as far as we understand it,

02:20:09 Mr Laiton,

02:20:10 is the Metropolitan Police's

02:20:12 running computer-assisted record,

02:20:15 computer-assisted dispatch record

02:20:17 of all the messages

02:20:18 coming through

02:20:19 the Metropolitan Police

02:20:21 in relation to this incident.

02:20:23 And if I can ask you, please,

02:20:24 to go to page 11 of that.

02:20:30 You can see that at 02-1002,

02:20:36 four-fifths of the way

02:20:37 down the page,

02:20:38 we can please have

02:20:39 that highlighted.

02:20:41 TWOP KNC Council informed,

02:20:46 and there's a reference,

02:20:47 Katherine Ascombe,

02:20:48 they will be contacting

02:20:49 their duty officer,

02:20:51 who will liaise

02:20:52 with BSC Direct.

02:20:53 Council has set up

02:20:54 a dedicated op named Erin

02:20:56 for any further

02:20:57 poll contact.

02:20:58 First of all,

02:20:59 do you know

02:21:00 who Erin Ascombe is or was?

02:21:03 I believe she was the operator

02:21:04 that took the call.

02:21:05 And do you know

02:21:06 who Erin might be?

02:21:07 I think Erin might be

02:21:08 the supervisor,

02:21:09 because they knew,

02:21:12 they obviously realised

02:21:13 it was made the emergency,

02:21:14 they set up a dedicated team

02:21:16 to take the calls.

02:21:20 Doing the best you can,

02:21:22 and I know this isn't

02:21:23 your record,

02:21:24 does this help you

02:21:25 time the first discussion

02:21:27 or call you took,

02:21:29 the only call you took

02:21:30 from GDIT?

02:21:32 Yes.

02:21:34 Would this indicate

02:21:37 that it was the police

02:21:38 who called GDIT?

02:21:42 No, not to me.

02:21:44 This is a police record,

02:21:46 but it just refers to the fact

02:21:48 that somebody called.

02:21:50 Right.

02:21:51 Going back to the Kerry log,

02:21:54 which we looked at

02:21:55 earlier on,

02:21:56 which is RBK00028849.

02:22:00 Perhaps we should just

02:22:01 have both of these on the

02:22:02 screen at the same time.

02:22:03 We can do that, Mr Laiton.

02:22:05 So keep CAD 482 on the screen

02:22:08 and then put up on the screen,

02:22:10 please, the Kerry log,

02:22:12 RBK00028849.

02:22:16 Okay.

02:22:17 So, I think we've got

02:22:18 a couple of questions

02:22:19 for you, Mr Laiton.

02:22:20 I think we've got a couple

02:22:21 of questions for you, Mr Laiton.

02:22:22 So, I think we've got a couple

02:22:23 of questions for you, Mr Laiton.

02:22:24 So, I think we've got a couple

02:22:25 of questions for you, Mr Laiton.

02:22:27 Okay.

02:22:28 And compare the two,

02:22:31 you've got David Kerry

02:22:33 marking a call from you

02:22:35 at 0221,

02:22:37 where you say,

02:22:38 police call GDIT at 0203,

02:22:42 and we've also got the

02:22:44 message on the counter

02:22:46 at 021002.

02:22:48 Is it possible to link

02:22:50 those together in some way?

02:22:53 It's possible, but it's not.

02:22:56 Right.

02:22:58 You're clear in your recollection,

02:23:01 are you, that the police called...

02:23:03 It was the police who called

02:23:04 the GDIT at 0203.

02:23:07 That is my understanding.

02:23:09 Well, that's certainly

02:23:10 David Kerry's note,

02:23:12 and this doesn't help you

02:23:13 clarify that any further.

02:23:15 This CA police...

02:23:17 That's the police document

02:23:18 saying that ties in.

02:23:20 Right.

02:23:21 That ties in.

02:23:23 It may tie in.

02:23:25 What does it tie in with,

02:23:26 let me ask you?

02:23:27 It just ties into who made the call

02:23:29 initially into the Addabelle Service.

02:23:32 Right.

02:23:34 And it might tie in...

02:23:35 Well, does it also tie in

02:23:36 with the time of 0221,

02:23:38 which is the time of your call

02:23:39 to David Kerry?

02:23:40 Yes, it would.

02:23:41 Right.

02:23:42 So that then leaves

02:23:43 outstanding the question

02:23:44 of the call at 0203.

02:23:46 Can you explain that?

02:23:47 No, I cannot.

02:23:48 Okay.

02:23:50 Looking back at that, then,

02:23:51 and reflecting on it,

02:23:52 you told us earlier

02:23:54 that you thought that it was

02:23:55 the LFB who had called GDIT.

02:23:57 Yes.

02:23:58 Is that right?

02:24:00 Not according to this, no.

02:24:02 Right.

02:24:03 Might you be wrong

02:24:04 that it was the LFB?

02:24:05 I could have been wrong.

02:24:06 Okay.

02:24:12 Mr. Nathan,

02:24:13 thank you very much.

02:24:14 You'll be glad to know

02:24:15 that I've come to the end

02:24:16 of my questions for you

02:24:17 this morning.

02:24:18 The normal process

02:24:19 is that we then rise

02:24:20 for a few minutes

02:24:21 so that I can double-check

02:24:22 with my mates and my team

02:24:23 whether I've covered everything

02:24:24 and then maybe some other

02:24:25 questions that people have.

02:24:27 So I'm going to ask the chairman

02:24:28 to rise for five minutes

02:24:29 just to allow that to happen.

02:24:31 Well, this is to give

02:24:32 Mr. Millett a chance

02:24:33 to order his thoughts

02:24:34 and check he's asked

02:24:35 all the right questions.

02:24:36 So we'll rise now

02:24:37 for five minutes,

02:24:38 come back at 10 to 12,

02:24:40 and same drill as before,

02:24:41 don't talk to anyone

02:24:42 about your evidence, please.

02:24:44 And the usher will look

02:24:45 after you.

02:24:46 All right?

02:24:47 Thank you.

02:24:51 All right.

02:25:02 Ten to twelve, I think.

02:25:21 Thank you.

02:25:46 Thank you.

02:26:11 Thank you.

02:26:36 Thank you.

02:27:01 Thank you.

02:27:26 Thank you.

02:27:51 Thank you.

02:28:16 Thank you.

02:28:41 Thank you.

02:29:06 Thank you.

02:29:31 Thank you.

02:29:56 Thank you.

02:30:21 Thank you.

02:30:46 Thank you.

02:31:11 Thank you.

02:31:26 Will that Mr. Millett,

02:31:28 one or two questions?

02:31:29 One or two, Mr. Chairman,

02:31:30 yes, thank you.

02:31:50 All right, Mr. Latham,

02:31:51 I think Mr. Millett's

02:31:52 got one or two questions,

02:31:53 so let's see how we go.

02:31:54 Yes, Mr. Chairman,

02:31:55 thank you very much.

02:31:56 Mr. Latham,

02:31:57 thank you for coming back to us.

02:31:58 There are just one or two.

02:31:59 First of all,

02:32:00 in terms of your training

02:32:01 as a lay low,

02:32:03 were these desktop training

02:32:04 sessions or programmes

02:32:06 or were they hands-on practical?

02:32:09 Desktop training sessions.

02:32:10 Desktop.

02:32:12 Secondly,

02:32:13 did you ever have any prior

02:32:14 dealings with Robert Black?

02:32:18 Before Grenfell Tower.

02:32:19 Before Grenfell Tower.

02:32:20 Never.

02:32:21 And you ever met him before?

02:32:23 Nothing I'm aware of.

02:32:25 Right.

02:32:26 Finally,

02:32:27 can I ask you to look please

02:32:28 at your own note of the night

02:32:29 at Rbk 00029036,

02:32:34 page two.

02:32:42 And as we can see,

02:32:44 two-thirds of the way down the page

02:32:46 at the time of 0550,

02:32:48 this is the TCM,

02:32:49 and your record of it.

02:32:50 We looked at it a moment ago

02:32:52 before the break,

02:32:53 and under the line

02:32:55 towards the bottom of the page,

02:32:56 it says numbers all rest centres,

02:32:58 names and addresses.

02:33:00 Can you just help us?

02:33:01 What is the reference there

02:33:02 to names and addresses?

02:33:05 We were trying to get information

02:33:09 from the rest centres

02:33:11 of any persons that were there

02:33:13 so that we could tell the fire brigade

02:33:16 people that we were known

02:33:18 were out of the tower.

02:33:20 Right.

02:33:21 So is that then therefore

02:33:24 not a reference to your raising

02:33:27 or being told about the need

02:33:28 for a list of residents in the tower?

02:33:31 No, it's not.

02:33:32 It's not.

02:33:34 Would it have helped the process

02:33:36 of identifying people

02:33:37 by name and address

02:33:38 at the rest centres

02:33:39 to have had a list of residents?

02:33:42 Yes, it would.

02:33:44 Mr Chairman,

02:33:45 I have nothing further.

02:33:46 Yes.

02:33:47 Mr Lakin,

02:33:48 I have no further questions for you.

02:33:49 It just remains for me

02:33:50 to thank you very much

02:33:51 for coming today

02:33:52 and assisting the inquiry

02:33:54 with our investigations.

02:33:55 We very much appreciate it.

02:33:56 So thank you.

02:33:57 I'd add my thanks

02:33:58 to those of you Mr Millett.

02:34:00 Mr Lakin,

02:34:01 I'm sorry,

02:34:02 I think it must have been difficult

02:34:03 for you at various points

02:34:05 in dealing with these matters

02:34:06 and I'm sorry about that,

02:34:07 but you have to understand

02:34:10 that your evidence

02:34:11 is very helpful to us.

02:34:12 Yes.

02:34:13 So we're very grateful to you

02:34:14 for coming along

02:34:15 to tell us what you were doing

02:34:16 and your experience on the night.

02:34:20 Thank you very much

02:34:21 for coming to give your evidence.

02:34:23 Right, now you're free to go.

02:34:24 Would you like to go with the usher?

02:34:25 She'll look after you.

02:34:41 Yes, Mr Millett.

02:34:43 Mr Chairman,

02:34:44 we are, I think, able

02:34:45 to go directly

02:34:46 into our next witness.

02:34:47 Right.

02:34:48 Without any change of scenery.

02:34:50 So I now call,

02:34:52 unless I'm wrong about that,

02:34:54 I now call Mr Mike Rumble

02:34:56 of RBKC please.

02:34:58 Yes, thank you.

02:35:20 I think you may have been wrong

02:35:23 about that.

02:35:24 I thought we were about

02:35:25 to have an inquiry first,

02:35:26 but never mind.

02:35:31 This witness is going to stand,

02:35:33 as you can tell,

02:35:34 to give his evidence.

02:35:35 Shall I see?

02:35:36 Yes.

02:35:37 I thought I would explain that

02:35:38 for those who perhaps

02:35:39 aren't able to see

02:35:40 what we can see.

02:35:50 Thank you.

02:36:05 Thank you very much.

02:36:06 You've been on the call

02:36:07 of duty, have you?

02:36:20 Thank you.

02:36:47 I swear by Almighty God

02:36:49 that the evidence I shall give

02:36:51 shall be the truth

02:36:53 the whole truth

02:36:54 and nothing but the truth.

02:36:56 Thank you very much,

02:36:57 Mr Rumble.

02:36:58 I know you're going to stand,

02:36:59 aren't you?

02:37:00 I am.

02:37:01 Thank you, sir.

02:37:02 Good. Thank you.

02:37:03 Yes, Mr Millett.

02:37:04 Mr Rumble,

02:37:05 could you please give

02:37:06 the inquiry your full name?

02:37:07 Michael John Scott Rumble.

02:37:09 Can I start by thanking you

02:37:11 very much for attending

02:37:12 the inquiry today

02:37:13 and assisting us

02:37:14 with our investigations

02:37:15 and the investigation

02:37:16 that we've been doing

02:37:17 for the past few weeks?

02:37:18 Thank you, sir.

02:37:19 As you've said,

02:37:20 we've been very hard on

02:37:21 you with the investigations.

02:37:22 We very much appreciate

02:37:23 you're doing so.

02:37:24 My questions are intended

02:37:26 to be short and simple.

02:37:27 Sometimes they don't

02:37:28 work out their way,

02:37:29 so if you need me

02:37:30 to repeat it

02:37:31 or put the question

02:37:32 in a different way,

02:37:33 I'm very happy to do so.

02:37:34 Equally, recalling some

02:37:35 of the events of the night

02:37:36 may be difficult at times,

02:37:38 and if you need a break

02:37:39 at any point,

02:37:40 please let us know.

02:37:41 Thank you.

02:37:42 Now, you've provided

02:37:43 two witness statements

02:37:44 for us.

02:37:45 The first is your

02:37:46 Metropolitan Police

02:37:47 of some seven pages,

02:37:48 and that's RBK00028988,

02:37:55 and the second is your

02:37:57 Rule 9 witness statement

02:37:58 of the 24th of September,

02:37:59 2018, at RBK00029037

02:38:05 of some 10 pages.

02:38:07 Can I ask you,

02:38:08 first of all, please,

02:38:09 to look at the first

02:38:12 of those, your police

02:38:15 witness statement

02:38:16 which carries an RBK reference.

02:38:18 That's 00028988.

02:38:22 Yes.

02:38:23 Well, that's...

02:38:24 Well, it doesn't matter.

02:38:25 We'll stick with this one,

02:38:26 which is your inquiry statement

02:38:27 for the time being.

02:38:28 That's RBK29037,

02:38:31 as you can see.

02:38:32 Turn, please, to page 10.

02:38:35 That has a name

02:38:36 and a signature

02:38:37 and address under a statement

02:38:38 of truth.

02:38:39 Is that your signature?

02:38:40 It is, yes.

02:38:41 And have you read

02:38:42 this witness statement recently?

02:38:43 I have.

02:38:44 And can you confirm for us

02:38:45 that the contents are true?

02:38:46 I can confirm that it is true.

02:38:48 Thank you very much.

02:38:49 Now, it is true, yes.

02:38:53 And to look at the other statement,

02:38:55 please, the first one you did,

02:38:56 which is RBK00028988.

02:39:00 And turn, please,

02:39:01 to page 7 in that.

02:39:06 You can see a signature there.

02:39:10 Is that your signature?

02:39:11 It is.

02:39:12 And have you read

02:39:13 this statement recently?

02:39:14 I have.

02:39:15 Exhibited to your second statement

02:39:18 are a number of documents,

02:39:19 MJSR1 through to MJSR5.

02:39:24 And I'll just read those

02:39:25 formally into the record.

02:39:26 The first is a Jezip memoir,

02:39:28 RBK00029038.

02:39:33 That's MJSR1.

02:39:35 MJSR2 is your RBKC

02:39:38 or the RBKC Contingency

02:39:40 Management Plan,

02:39:41 RBK0004396

02:39:45 MJSR3 is the London Resilience

02:39:48 Major Incident Procedure Manual,

02:39:50 RBK00013294,

02:39:52 which you've got elsewhere.

02:39:54 MJSR4 is the Lambeth Laylow

02:39:57 Incident Pack you used on the night,

02:39:59 RBK00029039.

02:40:02 And MJSR5 is the Laylow Log,

02:40:05 14th of June,

02:40:06 RBK00028838.

02:40:13 Can I, on that last document,

02:40:18 just have that up there please,

02:40:19 RBK00028838.

02:40:23 I have one or two preliminary questions.

02:40:25 You can either hard copy

02:40:26 all that screen or that screen,

02:40:27 make your choice.

02:40:32 That's RBK00028838.

02:40:42 Now,

02:40:49 is that it?

02:40:52 Perhaps we should turn the next,

02:40:53 turn the pages.

02:40:58 And then turn the page again.

02:41:00 I think you start

02:41:02 at this next page there.

02:41:04 Correct, that's the log I commenced

02:41:07 when I arrived at the scene.

02:41:08 So you've exhibited, I think,

02:41:09 just as I say, is that it?

02:41:11 I think this works on the basis

02:41:12 you've exhibited both Nick Leighton's log

02:41:15 and yours.

02:41:16 Yes, that's correct.

02:41:17 Just to be clear.

02:41:18 That's the first page, is it,

02:41:20 of your Laylow Incident Pack

02:41:22 you filled out on the night?

02:41:23 It is.

02:41:24 How soon are, sorry,

02:41:26 when did you fill it out?

02:41:28 Was it at the time or afterwards?

02:41:29 Yes, so this particular log was

02:41:31 the one I was keeping on me

02:41:32 at all times,

02:41:33 and as the incident progressed,

02:41:36 whenever I got a spare moment,

02:41:38 I tried to fill in as much detail

02:41:39 as I could on that log.

02:41:41 Thank you.

02:41:42 Now, we'll come back to that

02:41:44 in due course.

02:41:45 Can I start, please,

02:41:46 by asking you some questions

02:41:47 about your position,

02:41:48 career, training and experience.

02:41:51 I think you've been a Parks Police Inspector

02:41:54 for RBKC since 2009.

02:41:57 That's correct, yes.

02:41:58 And since 2013,

02:42:00 that's been a bi-borrow roll

02:42:03 split or divided between RBKC

02:42:06 and the London borough

02:42:07 of Hammersmith and Fuller.

02:42:08 Correct.

02:42:10 And so you are essentially

02:42:12 in that role responsible

02:42:13 also for that borough, Hammersmith and Fuller.

02:42:15 Yes, so for the parks and open spaces

02:42:17 and cemeteries across those two boroughs.

02:42:19 Yes.

02:42:20 And you are a trained LALO.

02:42:23 Yes, I am.

02:42:24 And I think you've been

02:42:25 a trained LALO since October 2015.

02:42:28 Yes.

02:42:29 On the night of the Granville Tower fire,

02:42:31 were you a LALO

02:42:33 or a LALO Support Officer?

02:42:35 I was a LALO training officer

02:42:37 at that stage.

02:42:38 And so in official terms,

02:42:41 from the moment of your involvement,

02:42:43 did you have the same

02:42:44 official capacity as Nick Layton?

02:42:46 Indeed, yes.

02:42:50 Is there a formal role

02:42:52 of a LALO Support Officer?

02:42:54 There is.

02:42:55 It tends to be

02:42:57 somebody who's being trained as a LALO

02:43:00 will start as a LALO Support Officer

02:43:02 and then carry on the training

02:43:04 with the London Fire Brigade

02:43:05 and then after that

02:43:06 they are sort of a qualified LALO.

02:43:08 But you were there on the night

02:43:09 as a fully accredited LALO.

02:43:11 Correct, yes.

02:43:13 Now at paragraph 6.2

02:43:15 in your inquiry witness statement,

02:43:21 I'm sorry, 6.2

02:43:22 in your inquiry statement,

02:43:24 it's page 2, paragraph 6.2,

02:43:27 you explain the training

02:43:29 you had as a LALO

02:43:31 and we can see what you say there.

02:43:34 What form did the training

02:43:35 you described there take?

02:43:37 Was it desktop or was it...

02:43:40 No, there was a practical course

02:43:43 at London Fire Brigade Headquarters.

02:43:48 And was that in 2015?

02:43:52 Yes, that's correct.

02:43:53 October 2015.

02:43:54 Did that course involve

02:43:56 dealing with fires?

02:43:58 There were a number of fires

02:44:01 mentioned as part of that course.

02:44:04 But it wasn't a practical course

02:44:07 it was desktop

02:44:08 as far as that was concerned.

02:44:09 So it was going through

02:44:10 a number of scenarios.

02:44:11 Did that involve a fire

02:44:12 in a high rise residential block?

02:44:14 I believe they'd mentioned

02:44:16 a number of fires

02:44:18 that had happened.

02:44:20 It was part of the manual.

02:44:22 So there were fire brigade officers

02:44:25 addressing that course

02:44:26 who had experience of major fires.

02:44:29 Major fires, high rise fires?

02:44:31 Yes, I can't recall

02:44:32 whether the Lacanel House fire

02:44:34 had occurred,

02:44:35 whether that was one

02:44:36 of the case studies.

02:44:37 But certainly they mentioned

02:44:39 a number of fires involving

02:44:41 blocks of flats.

02:44:43 Right.

02:44:44 And were those fires

02:44:47 trained as major incidents

02:44:49 as part of that training?

02:44:50 Yes, they would have been

02:44:51 classified as major incidents.

02:44:53 Right.

02:44:54 And do you remember

02:44:56 it's difficult perhaps to recall

02:44:58 but what was your major

02:44:59 learning point

02:45:00 or takeaway message

02:45:01 from that training

02:45:02 so far as it involves

02:45:04 a major incident fire

02:45:05 in a high rise residential block?

02:45:08 Yes, I mean, I think

02:45:11 the term high rise

02:45:13 may be a little bit misleading.

02:45:14 I think some of the fires

02:45:15 may have been smaller

02:45:17 than high rise

02:45:18 but nevertheless

02:45:19 I think the training

02:45:20 around that was really

02:45:22 about the fire brigade's

02:45:23 primary role

02:45:25 and what they may then require

02:45:27 from us as LALOs

02:45:29 and from the local authority

02:45:31 in a support role.

02:45:32 And what was that?

02:45:34 It really was, I mean, obviously

02:45:36 going back to the LALO manual

02:45:39 the local authority role

02:45:41 obviously is one of sort of

02:45:44 going from the stage

02:45:45 of evacuating residents

02:45:47 to setting up rest centres,

02:45:49 repatriation centres

02:45:51 and eventually looking at

02:45:53 humanitarian housing needs

02:45:55 further down the line

02:45:57 and then ideally

02:45:58 repatriating those people

02:45:59 back to their premises

02:46:01 at the end of an incident.

02:46:03 Now, at page 3 of your statement

02:46:05 at paragraph 6.5

02:46:07 you refer to an exercise

02:46:11 unified response

02:46:13 at Dartford in March 2016

02:46:16 and you say that

02:46:17 you describe it as a large scale

02:46:19 multi-agency disaster

02:46:20 training drill.

02:46:25 Who else,

02:46:27 which other LALO

02:46:29 at RBKC, if any,

02:46:31 attended that training?

02:46:33 Yeah, as I recall

02:46:35 David Kerry,

02:46:36 who's the emergency services manager

02:46:39 I think he was there

02:46:40 for all four days

02:46:42 of the event

02:46:45 and I was acting, if you like

02:46:48 as the London local authorities LALO

02:46:50 on the final day

02:46:52 of that incident

02:46:53 or that exercise.

02:46:55 And what did that exercise involve?

02:46:57 It was a major tube crash

02:47:00 so it involved a scenario

02:47:02 involving a tube train

02:47:05 on which a building had collapsed

02:47:07 on top of it.

02:47:08 Right.

02:47:09 It was an extremely

02:47:10 realistic exercise

02:47:11 it had taken some months

02:47:12 to set up

02:47:13 and was a very good scenario.

02:47:18 Did that involve

02:47:19 mass evacuation

02:47:20 of the building or?

02:47:22 It was mainly evacuation

02:47:24 of two passengers

02:47:26 those who had been rescued

02:47:28 from the tube train

02:47:30 but obviously those

02:47:31 who had been

02:47:32 in the vicinity as well.

02:47:34 Right.

02:47:38 And what was the major

02:47:39 learning point

02:47:40 that you took away

02:47:41 from your participation

02:47:42 in that exercise?

02:47:43 I think from that

02:47:45 it was mainly around

02:47:47 joint working

02:47:48 with the other services.

02:47:50 Again, it was very apparent

02:47:51 that the fire brigade

02:47:52 had set up the exercise

02:47:54 and they were the lead agency on it.

02:47:57 So again, it was

02:47:58 taking our lead

02:47:59 from the lead agency

02:48:01 and trying to respond

02:48:02 and provide as many services

02:48:04 as we could

02:48:05 acting with the fire brigade

02:48:07 being the lead agency

02:48:08 from there.

02:48:10 And you say in paragraph 6.6

02:48:12 of your statement

02:48:13 second statement

02:48:14 of page 3

02:48:15 that you were the

02:48:16 lay low for LBHF

02:48:18 London Borough

02:48:19 of Hammersmith and Fulham

02:48:20 at the Shepard's Court Fire

02:48:22 in August 2016.

02:48:24 Although everyone

02:48:25 was evacuated safely

02:48:26 on that occasion

02:48:27 approximately 20 households

02:48:28 were unable to return

02:48:29 to their properties

02:48:30 that night

02:48:31 and had to be placed

02:48:32 at temporary local accommodation.

02:48:35 What did your role

02:48:36 entail at that incident?

02:48:40 I was on duty on that.

02:48:42 It was late

02:48:43 on a Friday afternoon.

02:48:45 It was obviously

02:48:46 a very busy period of the day

02:48:48 with people returning home.

02:48:50 So I was on duty

02:48:52 as the parks police inspector

02:48:53 when we heard

02:48:54 the message

02:48:55 about the incident occurring.

02:48:57 And basically

02:48:58 because we were on duty

02:48:59 I sort of volunteered

02:49:00 to go to the scene

02:49:01 and start the log

02:49:03 acting as the lay low

02:49:04 at the scene.

02:49:06 It was a very well

02:49:07 coordinated response.

02:49:09 We were lucky in that

02:49:10 we had the whole

02:49:11 of Shepard's Bush Green

02:49:12 available to us

02:49:14 as a marshalling point

02:49:15 for the fire appliances

02:49:17 and for the ambulance

02:49:18 and for police vehicles.

02:49:20 So it was, if you like,

02:49:21 a little bit of a

02:49:22 textbook incident

02:49:24 in that it did go

02:49:25 extremely well.

02:49:27 There was obviously

02:49:28 danger to life there

02:49:29 and there were flames

02:49:31 coming up the front

02:49:32 of that building

02:49:33 over about two or three

02:49:35 stories as I recall.

02:49:38 It was also very lucky

02:49:40 that there weren't

02:49:41 a lot of people

02:49:42 in the building at the time

02:49:43 so they were able

02:49:44 to be all evacuated safely.

02:49:46 I think some of them

02:49:47 came across to the green

02:49:48 to start with.

02:49:50 And then after that

02:49:51 we were also lucky

02:49:52 that within a couple

02:49:53 of hundred yards

02:49:54 of the premises

02:49:55 there was,

02:49:56 I forget what it was,

02:49:57 it was some sort

02:49:58 of community centre

02:50:00 that we were able

02:50:01 to get opened up

02:50:02 and that's where

02:50:03 the casualties

02:50:04 were initially taken.

02:50:07 And did you have

02:50:08 any particular difficulties

02:50:10 in obtaining information

02:50:12 which the emergency service

02:50:14 is required at that incident?

02:50:17 Not really

02:50:18 because the housing

02:50:19 department from H&F

02:50:20 were on the scene

02:50:21 very quickly.

02:50:23 We were able to

02:50:24 set up a, you know,

02:50:26 within the reception

02:50:26 centre an arrangement

02:50:30 of council staff in there

02:50:31 who were able to get

02:50:32 details of the residents

02:50:34 and which flats

02:50:35 they had come from.

02:50:36 And then after that

02:50:38 we coordinated with

02:50:40 a number of local hotels

02:50:42 who had actually offered

02:50:43 bed spaces for people

02:50:44 if they weren't able

02:50:45 to return to their flats

02:50:46 that day.

02:50:49 Were there any lessons

02:50:50 learnt or takeaway points

02:50:51 from the Shepherds Court fire

02:50:53 in August 2016

02:50:54 that you were able

02:50:55 to apply at Grenfell?

02:50:57 I think, again,

02:50:59 the principle of having areas

02:51:03 where we could take

02:51:04 people who had been evacuated

02:51:06 obviously worked very well

02:51:07 on that occasion,

02:51:08 but you were obviously

02:51:09 talking about a far

02:51:11 lesser number of people

02:51:12 than was at Grenfell.

02:51:16 Now, moving on to your role

02:51:18 in emergencies

02:51:19 as a lay low,

02:51:20 paragraph six you say

02:51:24 at the start of that paragraph

02:51:28 back on page two,

02:51:29 three lines down,

02:51:30 the lay low, you say,

02:51:32 is someone who is part

02:51:33 of an on-call response team

02:51:34 that attends incidents

02:51:36 on behalf of the local

02:51:37 authority and liaises

02:51:38 with the contingency

02:51:39 planning teams.

02:51:43 And then you say

02:51:44 the role is to be the link

02:51:45 between the incident scene

02:51:46 and the borough

02:51:47 via the Borough Emergency

02:51:48 Control Centre,

02:51:49 the BEC, if one is set up.

02:51:51 The key role is to be

02:51:53 the key role is to

02:51:54 survey, assess

02:51:55 and disseminate information

02:51:56 and to relay requests

02:51:57 from the emergency services

02:51:58 back to the BEC.

02:52:00 Now, the role of a lay low

02:52:04 I think is also set out

02:52:05 in the silver manual.

02:52:08 If I could show you that,

02:52:09 that's RVK00029035.

02:52:21 And it's page,

02:52:22 page 39 of that.

02:52:35 Would you agree

02:52:36 that those functions

02:52:37 set out there

02:52:38 under CMP 5.4?

02:52:40 It's very difficult to read

02:52:41 on the small screen.

02:52:42 Can you have it?

02:52:43 Which bit do you want

02:52:44 to refer to?

02:52:45 Yes, there.

02:52:46 I think we've blown it up.

02:52:47 Thank you.

02:52:49 Can you see that there?

02:52:50 Would you agree

02:52:51 that the functions set out there

02:52:52 as key tasks

02:52:53 and those six bullet points

02:52:56 were part of your role

02:52:58 on the night?

02:52:59 Yes, I would.

02:53:01 Now, we'll come back to that

02:53:03 or may come back to that shortly.

02:53:04 Going back to your statement,

02:53:06 can you please go to page 3?

02:53:12 Paragraph 8 there,

02:53:14 under the heading

02:53:15 14th of June 2017,

02:53:17 you say,

02:53:18 at approximately 2.45 hours

02:53:19 I received a telephone call

02:53:20 from David Kerry,

02:53:21 the RBKC Contingency Planning Manager,

02:53:24 and he informed me

02:53:25 that there was a major fire

02:53:26 at Grenfell Tower.

02:53:30 And you go on to say

02:53:32 that you were told

02:53:33 that Nick Layton,

02:53:34 the Borough Duty Officer

02:53:35 and Layla had already

02:53:36 been informed of the fire

02:53:37 and was making his way

02:53:38 to the scene,

02:53:39 but in light of the scale

02:53:40 of the fire,

02:53:41 further support was required.

02:53:42 Were you told at that stage

02:53:45 that the Metropolitan Police

02:53:47 had declared the fire

02:53:49 a major incident?

02:53:51 Not that I can recall, no.

02:53:53 Were you told

02:53:54 that the London Fire Brigade

02:53:56 had declared the fire

02:53:58 a major incident?

02:53:59 I don't believe

02:54:00 I was told at that time.

02:54:04 What level of major incident

02:54:06 did you or were you led

02:54:08 to believe this was?

02:54:11 From the information

02:54:12 that I got from Mr Kerry,

02:54:13 I'd obviously got the impression

02:54:15 that it was serious,

02:54:17 but obviously until

02:54:18 I arrived at the scene,

02:54:19 I didn't know quite

02:54:21 how serious it was.

02:54:23 And you're familiar,

02:54:25 we can look at it if you like,

02:54:27 with the yellow, amber,

02:54:28 red scales of seriousness.

02:54:31 Did there come a time

02:54:33 when you thought

02:54:34 it was level three major?

02:54:37 Obviously once I'd arrived

02:54:39 at the scene

02:54:40 and when I parked the vehicle

02:54:43 as close as I could get to it,

02:54:45 it was obviously very apparent

02:54:46 that in the network

02:54:47 of small streets

02:54:48 leading up to the tower,

02:54:50 just the sheer scale

02:54:52 of the number of fire appliances

02:54:54 and emergency vehicles there,

02:54:56 that this was,

02:54:57 I was certainly at that stage

02:54:59 I would have considered

02:55:00 a major incident.

02:55:02 Did you have a discussion

02:55:04 with Mr Layton

02:55:05 when you first found him

02:55:07 about manpower,

02:55:08 RBKC manpower

02:55:10 that you might need?

02:55:12 Not that I recall at that stage.

02:55:16 What did you understand

02:55:19 your role to have been

02:55:21 in attending,

02:55:22 given that Nick Layton

02:55:24 was already there as a Lalo

02:55:26 or was on his way?

02:55:28 Yes, so initially

02:55:29 it was to support him.

02:55:32 He obviously told me

02:55:34 that at a fairly early stage

02:55:36 he obviously had to return

02:55:38 to the town hall

02:55:39 to open up and carry out

02:55:41 his other duties there.

02:55:43 And so it was sort of apparent

02:55:45 that at some stage

02:55:46 in the next hour or two hours

02:55:48 I would be taking over from him

02:55:50 as the main Lalo on scene.

02:55:52 During the period

02:55:53 when you were there together

02:55:54 who was the,

02:55:55 if I can put it this way,

02:55:56 the senior Lalo

02:55:57 or were you equal?

02:55:58 I would say we were equal.

02:56:00 Because Nick was there earlier

02:56:02 and had a better grasp

02:56:03 of what was actually going on,

02:56:05 he carried on

02:56:07 with that particular role

02:56:09 which gave me an opportunity

02:56:10 to look at a number

02:56:11 of other aspects

02:56:12 and certainly familiarise

02:56:14 myself with the location.

02:56:16 I see.

02:56:17 And just briefly,

02:56:18 what other aspects

02:56:19 were you looking at?

02:56:20 Well, obviously one

02:56:21 of the other council premises

02:56:22 nearby was the

02:56:23 Kensington Leisure Centre.

02:56:25 Although it's owned

02:56:27 by the council,

02:56:28 it's operated by

02:56:29 Greenwich Leisure

02:56:30 who would be normally

02:56:32 arriving there

02:56:33 probably not before

02:56:34 seven o'clock in the morning.

02:56:36 So I needed to see

02:56:38 whether that premises

02:56:40 was actually accessible.

02:56:42 I was not aware

02:56:43 of that.

02:56:44 And when I arrived,

02:56:45 obviously it was open

02:56:47 and I think as we've learned,

02:56:49 it was broken into,

02:56:50 if you like,

02:56:51 by the police

02:56:52 or the fire service

02:56:53 as an obvious point

02:56:54 of using it

02:56:57 for the purpose

02:56:58 that it was used.

02:57:00 Now, just timing your

02:57:02 arrival at the scene,

02:57:03 you say in your second

02:57:05 statement at paragraph 8.3

02:57:06 on page 4,

02:57:08 if you can just have that

02:57:09 please on the screen,

02:57:11 in the second line

02:57:12 that you arrived

02:57:15 there at approximately

02:57:17 3.10 hours.

02:57:23 Is that right?

02:57:25 Yes, that's correct.

02:57:26 I probably arrived there

02:57:28 sort of six or seven minutes

02:57:29 earlier,

02:57:30 but obviously had to walk

02:57:32 from the nearest point

02:57:33 where I could leave the vehicle

02:57:34 to get to Paymore Road.

02:57:36 What were you using

02:57:37 when you did your statement

02:57:38 to approximate your time

02:57:39 of arrival as 0.310 hours?

02:57:42 Well, I looked at my watch

02:57:43 and just made a note.

02:57:45 Right.

02:57:46 Now, you say also

02:57:47 in that paragraph

02:57:48 in the next part

02:57:50 that you had a Laylow incident pack

02:57:53 issued by Lambeth Council

02:57:55 which contained a handy

02:57:56 aid-in-aim wire stroke

02:57:57 checklist on immediate

02:57:58 problems to consider

02:58:00 and you exhibited.

02:58:04 Is it right that RBKC,

02:58:06 as you say,

02:58:07 didn't have their own incident pack?

02:58:09 Yes, I mean, I believe

02:58:10 they used one that was provided

02:58:13 by the London Fire Brigade,

02:58:15 but essentially all that was

02:58:17 was a lined piece of A4

02:58:19 with a few notes on it.

02:58:21 I'd obviously acquired

02:58:22 the Lambeth Council pack

02:58:24 at the major incident exercise

02:58:26 at Dartford,

02:58:27 and I considered it

02:58:28 was a very useful document.

02:58:30 Right.

02:58:31 So luckily I was able

02:58:33 to locate it in the office

02:58:34 before I went to the scene.

02:58:36 A matter of chance.

02:58:37 Yes, yes.

02:58:38 I mean, I'd obviously kept it

02:58:39 with my notes from the Laylow course

02:58:43 and the documents

02:58:45 from the major incident exercise.

02:58:47 How did the Lambeth incident pack

02:58:50 help you?

02:58:52 I think, I mean,

02:58:53 I do like to make my notes

02:58:55 as effectively as possible.

02:58:57 It was a good layout

02:58:58 to do that,

02:58:59 but it also contained

02:59:00 a number of useful things,

02:59:02 like there's a chart

02:59:03 which shows the rank structure

02:59:05 of the London Fire Brigade

02:59:06 and the police,

02:59:07 and the keynotes

02:59:09 from methane

02:59:10 and the other mnemonics

02:59:12 that are used in the incident.

02:59:13 So, you know,

02:59:15 it was very useful

02:59:16 to have that with me.

02:59:17 Also sort of A5 fold oversize

02:59:19 which was useful

02:59:20 to keep in my pocket.

02:59:22 Can I just look at that with you?

02:59:23 It's MJS4,

02:59:26 MJSR4,

02:59:27 which is RBK00029039,

02:59:31 just to square that off,

02:59:33 Mr. Rumbl, if we can.

02:59:35 If we could just turn the pages

02:59:36 quickly to see how this pack

02:59:39 works.

02:59:42 So it looks like

02:59:43 it's a spiral-bound A5

02:59:45 with some contents in it.

02:59:46 Yes.

02:59:47 And various logs at the end

02:59:50 under the appendices.

02:59:52 And so did you,

02:59:54 and there's the reference

02:59:56 on page five,

02:59:57 if we could stop there,

02:59:58 to the methane.

02:59:59 Did you find that helpful to you?

03:00:00 Yeah, it was indeed, yes.

03:00:02 Yes.

03:00:03 Now,

03:00:05 you say in paragraph 8.5

03:00:13 or 8.3,

03:00:14 at the end of 8.3

03:00:15 and then in 8.5,

03:00:16 I located this fire control

03:00:18 silver vehicle

03:00:21 and it formed the command control

03:00:22 of my presence.

03:00:25 When you say the command control,

03:00:26 do you mean the LFB command unit?

03:00:29 Yes, I mean,

03:00:30 it was obviously very apparent

03:00:31 on my arrival

03:00:33 that this was a fire brigade-led incident

03:00:37 and, you know,

03:00:40 I knew that that's who

03:00:41 I would be reporting to.

03:00:43 I mean, normally,

03:00:44 ideally at a major incident,

03:00:45 you would have the fire brigade control,

03:00:49 the police control

03:00:50 and the ambulance control co-located.

03:00:53 I think because of the layout

03:00:54 and the narrow streets

03:00:56 around the area,

03:00:57 that wasn't possible.

03:00:59 So I definitely made

03:01:01 my initial point of contact

03:01:03 with my ongoing point of contact,

03:01:05 the fire brigade

03:01:06 silver command vehicle.

03:01:07 How long after arriving

03:01:08 at around 3.10,

03:01:10 do you think you made first contact

03:01:11 with the command unit?

03:01:13 Oh, within five or ten minutes.

03:01:15 Do you remember who you spoke to

03:01:16 at the command unit?

03:01:17 I don't.

03:01:18 I mean, I think I just knocked on the door

03:01:20 and reported my arrival to them.

03:01:22 Right.

03:01:23 And did they tell you anything

03:01:25 at that stage

03:01:26 about what they needed from you?

03:01:27 No, I think I can't recall

03:01:30 how long it was

03:01:31 before I located Nick Layton

03:01:34 and we then discussed

03:01:36 what would be required

03:01:37 from the local authority.

03:01:39 So at that stage,

03:01:41 I sort of gave them my contact details.

03:01:44 As far as I remember,

03:01:45 I probably gave them

03:01:46 my mobile phone number

03:01:47 and obviously said,

03:01:48 I'm on the scene

03:01:49 and if there's anything you want,

03:01:51 please get in contact.

03:01:53 And obviously,

03:01:54 I was told about the silver meeting

03:01:57 so I would then be aware

03:01:58 that when the next silver meeting

03:02:00 was going to take place.

03:02:03 Right.

03:02:05 And so at the time of your arrival,

03:02:07 did they tell you

03:02:08 that this first silver meeting

03:02:10 had happened yet

03:02:11 or was in progress

03:02:12 or was about to happen?

03:02:13 I got the impression

03:02:14 that Nick Layton

03:02:15 had probably just come

03:02:16 from one meeting,

03:02:17 so one had just recently taken place

03:02:21 and I obviously wasn't anticipating

03:02:23 the next one for at least an hour.

03:02:25 Okay.

03:02:26 We could follow this through

03:02:27 because you then say in 8.4

03:02:28 that you went to the

03:02:29 Kensington Leisure Centre

03:02:31 and then in 8.5 of your statement

03:02:33 on the screen there

03:02:34 towards the bottom of the Parley Scott.

03:02:35 Yes.

03:02:36 I returned to the silver command vehicle

03:02:38 and met up with Nick,

03:02:39 Nicholas Layton

03:02:40 who was acting as Lalo.

03:02:41 He informed me

03:02:42 that he'd attended

03:02:43 at a silver meeting

03:02:44 at 03.15 hours

03:02:46 and that approximately

03:02:47 100 people were believed

03:02:48 to still be inside

03:02:49 Grenfell Tower.

03:02:50 Now, was this the first occasion

03:02:54 on which you met Nick Layton

03:02:55 on the scene?

03:02:56 Sorry, was this the...

03:02:57 The first occasion

03:02:58 at which you met Nick Layton?

03:02:59 Yes, I believe so.

03:03:00 Right.

03:03:01 Now, we know that this meeting

03:03:02 finished at or around 03.32.

03:03:06 I don't need to show you

03:03:08 the log that the LFB made for that,

03:03:11 but would that sound about right to you

03:03:13 as to when you met Nick Layton first,

03:03:16 having arrived at around 03.10?

03:03:18 Yes.

03:03:19 Excellent.

03:03:20 Now...

03:03:26 Does that mean

03:03:26 that you're clear in your recollection

03:03:27 that you didn't attend

03:03:28 the first TCM?

03:03:30 That's correct, yes, I didn't.

03:03:37 Did you attend any of the TCMs

03:03:40 during the time that Nick Layton

03:03:41 was present at the incident?

03:03:43 As I recall,

03:03:44 I think the first one I attended

03:03:46 was the one approximately 07.10.

03:03:49 Yes.

03:03:50 That's after Nick Layton had left?

03:03:52 Yes.

03:03:53 I see.

03:03:56 When you met up with Nick Layton,

03:03:59 you say that he told you

03:04:00 that he'd had the silver meeting

03:04:01 and that approximately 100 people

03:04:03 were believed to still be

03:04:04 inside Granfell Tower.

03:04:06 Did he tell you anything else

03:04:08 as to what had transpired

03:04:09 at that first silver meeting?

03:04:11 Not really, no.

03:04:12 I mean, he did tell me

03:04:13 that obviously in our role

03:04:16 of looking at reception centres

03:04:18 and where we're going to house

03:04:22 people who'd been evacuated

03:04:23 from the tower,

03:04:25 he did tell me

03:04:26 that there had been one premises

03:04:29 on Shepherds Bush Green set up

03:04:31 which I believe may have been a pub

03:04:32 or similar premises

03:04:34 and they'd had that particular,

03:04:36 if you like,

03:04:37 volunteered their premises

03:04:38 to be set up.

03:04:39 Was that Belushi's?

03:04:40 I believe so, yes.

03:04:42 At the stage you met Nick Layton,

03:04:44 did you discuss

03:04:45 your respective responsibilities

03:04:47 in carrying out your Lele roles?

03:04:50 Only in general terms.

03:04:54 I was happy for Nick

03:04:56 to carry on as the primary Lele,

03:04:59 if you like,

03:05:00 which gave me a little bit of time

03:05:02 to look at the scenario

03:05:04 around the scene

03:05:05 and sort out a few other matters.

03:05:07 What did you agree

03:05:08 or discuss between yourselves

03:05:10 about what you would do?

03:05:13 I was looking at obviously premises

03:05:16 which we could use

03:05:18 for evacuating people too

03:05:21 and obviously the primary one there

03:05:23 was the Kensington Leisure Centre

03:05:26 but when I got there

03:05:27 it was obvious

03:05:28 that it had been entered

03:05:31 and it was being used

03:05:32 by the fire service

03:05:33 and the police

03:05:35 and that obviously was not going

03:05:36 to be a suitable location

03:05:38 to put residents in

03:05:41 and also it was, in my opinion,

03:05:44 far too close to the tower

03:05:47 because at that stage

03:05:48 we didn't know

03:05:50 whether there was a danger

03:05:51 of any form of collapse

03:05:53 Right. Did you discuss

03:05:55 the risk of collapse

03:05:56 with Nick Layton

03:05:57 at that first meeting

03:05:58 with him after the first meeting?

03:05:59 I can't recall

03:06:00 whether I discussed it

03:06:01 and obviously because

03:06:03 of the horrendous nature

03:06:04 of the fire

03:06:05 and obviously when I arrived

03:06:07 obviously I'd never experienced

03:06:08 anything like that

03:06:09 on that scale

03:06:11 but it was in my mind

03:06:14 that there could be a danger

03:06:17 of certainly debris falling

03:06:19 and there could be a danger

03:06:20 of collapse, yes.

03:06:23 So did you have a discussion

03:06:25 with Nick Layton at that stage

03:06:26 about the need

03:06:27 to have a dangerous

03:06:28 structures engineer present?

03:06:30 Not that I recall.

03:06:33 Now I'm going to turn

03:06:34 to the TMO

03:06:37 and just ask you first of all

03:06:40 to look at paragraph 9

03:06:41 of your statement.

03:06:44 You say there

03:06:47 at the top of page 5

03:06:49 and we can have this expanded

03:06:50 for you so you can see

03:06:51 it on the screen

03:06:52 I believe that the Kensington

03:06:53 and Chelsea Tenant Management

03:06:55 Organisation, TMO,

03:06:56 also have some form

03:06:57 of emergency call-out system.

03:06:59 There were representatives

03:07:00 from the TMO on site

03:07:01 from early on.

03:07:04 Now first of all

03:07:06 do you know what the TMO's

03:07:08 emergency call-out system

03:07:09 is or was?

03:07:11 Yes, only in very basic detail.

03:07:14 I mean I met the one TMO rep

03:07:17 there, Hash,

03:07:19 and I'm just wondering

03:07:22 I'm still not quite sure

03:07:23 what his role was

03:07:24 but I understood he had a role

03:07:27 in the management

03:07:28 of the Lancaster West Estate.

03:07:30 Right, did you know

03:07:31 on the night whether or not

03:07:32 the TMO had activated

03:07:34 their own emergency plan?

03:07:36 Not until later,

03:07:38 you know a lot later

03:07:39 in the day.

03:07:41 Right, and what did you discover

03:07:43 later in the day

03:07:44 that they had

03:07:45 or that they hadn't

03:07:46 activated their own emergency plan?

03:07:48 When I spoke to,

03:07:49 I obviously spoke to Mr Black,

03:07:50 the Chief Executive

03:07:51 if he was on the scene

03:07:52 at a fairly early stage,

03:07:53 and Theresa Brown,

03:07:55 and in speaking to them

03:07:57 it was obvious that they had

03:08:00 called out if you like

03:08:01 a number of members of staff

03:08:03 to assist either at the scene

03:08:05 or back at the sort of

03:08:08 TMO offices.

03:08:10 So it was apparent for me

03:08:11 that they were aware

03:08:14 of the seriousness

03:08:15 of the situation

03:08:16 and whether they'd got

03:08:17 a formal call-out procedure

03:08:18 or not, I'm not sure,

03:08:19 but they were getting the staff

03:08:22 in if you like.

03:08:23 Right, just standing back

03:08:25 from it for a moment,

03:08:27 did you know on the night

03:08:29 what would happen

03:08:30 if they had their own plan

03:08:32 and activated it,

03:08:33 how that would link

03:08:34 with your plan?

03:08:35 Not specifically, no.

03:08:36 Okay, now at paragraph 9

03:08:40 of your statement

03:08:41 that we're on,

03:08:42 you go on to say

03:08:43 around the time

03:08:44 I met with Nicholas Layton

03:08:45 I also made contact

03:08:46 with someone

03:08:47 whom I only know as Hatch,

03:08:48 I believe that he was a warden

03:08:50 from the TMO

03:08:52 and that's I think Hatch Shamshoon.

03:08:55 I believe so, yes.

03:08:56 I didn't know his name at the time.

03:08:58 Right.

03:08:59 You didn't know his name

03:09:00 at the time.

03:09:01 Had you ever met him before?

03:09:02 No.

03:09:04 And where did you make

03:09:07 that contact with Hatch?

03:09:09 Again, it was outside

03:09:10 the Farbligate Silver Command

03:09:12 vehicle and I think obviously

03:09:14 he was with Nicholas Layton

03:09:16 when I first met him

03:09:17 I see.

03:09:18 And who introduced Hatch to you?

03:09:21 Did he introduce himself?

03:09:22 I believe that was Nicholas, yes.

03:09:24 I see.

03:09:25 Did you have any discussion

03:09:26 with Hatch?

03:09:28 Only in the sort of vaguest terms

03:09:30 to ensure that he was in contact

03:09:33 with the rest of the TMO

03:09:35 if you like.

03:09:36 Did you ask him anything specific

03:09:38 or did you ask him for anything specific?

03:09:40 Not at that stage, no.

03:09:41 I mean it was,

03:09:43 you know, he was a very

03:09:45 he was,

03:09:47 it was obviously he had knowledge

03:09:49 of the neighbourhood

03:09:51 but his other role

03:09:54 I'm not sure of.

03:09:56 Was he there when you arrived

03:09:57 or did he arrive

03:09:58 a lot later?

03:09:59 I think he was probably there.

03:10:00 I mean obviously when I,

03:10:01 he was there with Nicholas

03:10:02 when I first met Nicholas.

03:10:04 Okay.

03:10:05 Did you provide him with a radio

03:10:06 or some kind of means

03:10:07 of communication?

03:10:08 I did, yes.

03:10:09 I brought a couple of our spare

03:10:11 council radios with me

03:10:12 to the scene

03:10:13 and I gave them a radio each

03:10:15 just to hopefully facilitate

03:10:17 better communication.

03:10:19 Right.

03:10:20 So would that mean

03:10:21 that he was able to communicate

03:10:22 with anybody?

03:10:23 Well, let me ask it this way.

03:10:24 Who would Hatch have been able

03:10:26 to communicate

03:10:27 by using the radio you gave him?

03:10:28 Yeah, the council radio system

03:10:30 which is primarily used

03:10:31 by the Parks Police

03:10:32 but also by neighbourhood wardens

03:10:34 and sort of out of office services

03:10:36 like that

03:10:37 is on what's called

03:10:38 a talk through system.

03:10:39 Right.

03:10:40 So anybody can talk

03:10:41 to anybody else

03:10:42 it's monitored by the 24-7

03:10:45 CCTV room in Hammersmith Town Hall

03:10:49 which covers both boroughs.

03:10:51 So it's a useful way

03:10:53 of obviously communicating

03:10:54 with other council staff.

03:10:56 Does that mean that Hatch Shamchoo

03:10:58 if he broadcast a message

03:11:00 over the radio you gave him

03:11:02 could be heard by those

03:11:05 RBKC officers who had their

03:11:07 radios with them and on?

03:11:09 That's correct, yes.

03:11:10 Now you then go on

03:11:12 in the same paragraph

03:11:13 of your statement,

03:11:14 second statement, paragraph 9, page 5

03:11:16 to say TMO representatives

03:11:19 were not allowed

03:11:20 into the silver meetings

03:11:21 so as LELO we also had to act

03:11:23 as the liaison between the TMO

03:11:24 and the emergency services.

03:11:26 Robert Black, the chief executive

03:11:27 of the TMO

03:11:28 and Theresa Brown

03:11:29 also of the TMO

03:11:30 were in attendance.

03:11:32 First of all,

03:11:34 do you remember what time

03:11:37 Robert Black was present

03:11:39 when Robert Black arrived?

03:11:43 I can't recall exactly.

03:11:44 I mean I think he was in the

03:11:46 vicinity in advance

03:11:48 of the silver meeting

03:11:50 at 7.10.

03:11:52 Right.

03:11:53 So probably you know

03:11:54 maybe between half past 6

03:11:55 and 7.00.

03:11:57 Roughly what time

03:11:59 do you recall you

03:12:01 were aware of his presence

03:12:02 at the incident?

03:12:04 Again, I would think

03:12:06 I mean I came back

03:12:07 to the silver vehicle

03:12:09 probably 10 to 20 minutes

03:12:11 before the 7.10 meeting

03:12:14 and as I recall

03:12:15 it's a bit difficult obviously

03:12:17 to because I obviously met

03:12:18 an awful lot of people

03:12:19 on the night

03:12:20 but I've got a recollection

03:12:22 that I did meet him

03:12:23 and Theresa Brown

03:12:24 before that 7.10 meeting.

03:12:27 Do you have a recollection

03:12:28 of meeting either

03:12:29 of those individuals

03:12:31 at any stage prior

03:12:32 to that meeting,

03:12:33 prior to that 20 minute point

03:12:35 prior to the meeting?

03:12:37 Yeah, not that I can recall

03:12:39 right.

03:12:42 Do you remember

03:12:43 what the first matter

03:12:45 that you discussed with them

03:12:46 was either of them?

03:12:50 I think obviously they

03:12:53 came to me

03:12:54 as the council representative

03:12:56 to offer their services

03:12:58 and say that they

03:12:59 were at the scene

03:13:01 and so I think at that stage

03:13:03 I knew that the 7.10 meeting

03:13:05 was about to take place

03:13:07 and then I think what I said

03:13:08 to them was

03:13:09 well obviously after that meeting

03:13:11 I'll get back to you

03:13:12 and it made sense then

03:13:15 to attend that meeting

03:13:16 find out what the requirements

03:13:17 from the fire service were

03:13:19 and then speak

03:13:20 to the TMO representatives.

03:13:22 Had you ever come across

03:13:24 Robert Black or Theresa Brown

03:13:25 before?

03:13:26 Not personally,

03:13:27 I think I may have met him

03:13:29 at one meeting

03:13:30 but only in passing.

03:13:33 Now you say

03:13:34 as I've just read to you

03:13:35 that the TMO representatives

03:13:36 were not allowed

03:13:37 into silver meetings.

03:13:39 Why is that?

03:13:40 I think because

03:13:42 of the major incident structure

03:13:46 the key participants

03:13:47 obviously are the emergency services

03:13:50 and the council

03:13:51 as a key partner within that

03:13:55 so other organisations

03:13:56 who could assist

03:13:58 and may well have a part

03:14:00 later on in the incident

03:14:03 are not necessarily invited

03:14:06 to that meeting.

03:14:07 Obviously people like

03:14:08 the gas service

03:14:09 and London Transport

03:14:13 and various utilities

03:14:14 if you like

03:14:15 can be party to that meeting

03:14:16 but they're not always invited

03:14:18 to every meeting.

03:14:19 It depends on

03:14:20 the fire brigade commander

03:14:21 will have the ultimate say

03:14:22 as to who comes to that meeting.

03:14:25 Was there any discussion

03:14:26 at the time that you can recall

03:14:27 about whether the TMO

03:14:29 should have been

03:14:30 at any of those silver meetings?

03:14:32 Not that I can recall.

03:14:33 Right.

03:14:38 Now, were you aware

03:14:43 at any time before

03:14:45 Nick Layton left the scene

03:14:47 that he had been asking

03:14:51 Robert Black

03:14:52 for details of residents

03:14:54 of Grenfell Tower?

03:14:57 I don't believe

03:14:58 that was specifically mentioned

03:14:59 to me at that stage.

03:15:03 What about details

03:15:04 of the residents

03:15:05 who were at rest centres?

03:15:08 That was, I mean, again,

03:15:12 I can't say,

03:15:13 I can't recall

03:15:14 what that was specifically

03:15:15 asked for.

03:15:19 Were you aware

03:15:21 that requests that had been made

03:15:23 by Nick Layton

03:15:24 to the TMO

03:15:25 for a list of residents

03:15:27 of the tower

03:15:28 were outstanding

03:15:30 by the time of the third TCM

03:15:33 at 0550?

03:15:36 Is that something you knew?

03:15:38 Yes, again,

03:15:39 I can't recall that.

03:15:43 When or after

03:15:44 Nick Layton left the scene,

03:15:46 do you remember following up

03:15:47 the question

03:15:48 or chasing the TMO

03:15:50 for a list of residents?

03:15:53 I did at some stage

03:15:54 ask them for that

03:15:55 list of residents.

03:15:56 I've got the feeling

03:15:57 that that was though

03:15:58 after the 710 meeting.

03:16:01 Right.

03:16:03 Do you remember

03:16:04 observing any direct contact

03:16:06 between the TMO staff

03:16:08 and the emergency services?

03:16:11 At some stage,

03:16:12 I was made aware

03:16:13 that Mr Black had on his phone

03:16:17 a floor plan

03:16:18 of part of the tower

03:16:20 and I think he then spoke

03:16:24 through the hatch,

03:16:25 so there is a sort of hatch

03:16:26 on the silver vehicle

03:16:28 whereby a fire brigade

03:16:30 can speak to anybody

03:16:31 outside the vehicle

03:16:33 and I recall at some stage

03:16:35 that he was speaking

03:16:36 with them

03:16:37 about what he may have

03:16:39 got on his mobile phone

03:16:40 but I can't recall

03:16:41 the time that took place.

03:16:43 Okay, we'll come back

03:16:44 to that in a minute

03:16:45 and follow that up.

03:16:46 Before I do,

03:16:47 can I ask you

03:16:48 to look at paragraph 11

03:16:49 of your statement

03:16:53 and just summarising it there,

03:16:55 you set out there

03:16:57 the arrangements you made

03:16:58 for other parks,

03:16:59 police, constables,

03:17:00 including two experienced

03:17:01 officers to attend the scene

03:17:06 and they arrived at 7.40,

03:17:10 you go on to say,

03:17:11 Tilbury and Pullen arrived

03:17:13 at about 7.40,

03:17:15 does that mean

03:17:16 that for a period

03:17:18 until their arrival

03:17:19 you were actually

03:17:20 the sole lay low at the scene?

03:17:22 It does, yes.

03:17:23 Okay.

03:17:26 Were there any

03:17:27 outstanding priorities

03:17:28 that you recall

03:17:29 you had to address

03:17:31 once he had gone

03:17:32 but before they arrived?

03:17:34 I think obviously

03:17:36 the actions from the 7.10 meeting

03:17:39 were the ones

03:17:40 that I was trying

03:17:41 to get sorted out

03:17:42 at that stage.

03:17:45 And do you remember

03:17:47 what those were?

03:17:49 I believe one of them

03:17:51 was the request

03:17:52 from the fire brigade,

03:17:54 the most urgent request

03:17:56 was the one for plans

03:17:58 of the building.

03:17:59 Now we'll come to that.

03:18:03 Before I do,

03:18:04 just a couple of questions,

03:18:05 do you know

03:18:11 or can you help me

03:18:12 with whether you know

03:18:13 whether Mr Black

03:18:15 or indeed Theresa Brown

03:18:16 had asked anybody else

03:18:18 within the TMO

03:18:19 for a list of residents?

03:18:22 I don't,

03:18:23 I mean most of the requests

03:18:25 for the TMO I passed on

03:18:26 to Theresa Brown

03:18:29 but what happened

03:18:31 subsequently,

03:18:32 who she asked I wouldn't know.

03:18:34 Okay, now we come then

03:18:35 to the fourth TCM,

03:18:37 silver at 7.13 or so

03:18:40 and I want to take you

03:18:46 to your log

03:18:48 which is RBEK00028838

03:18:53 please.

03:19:01 And this starts

03:19:03 on page,

03:19:04 I think page four,

03:19:05 correct me if I'm wrong,

03:19:06 but it starts on page four

03:19:10 in the bottom part

03:19:12 of the document

03:19:14 underneath the spiral bound

03:19:15 half way down,

03:19:16 07.10 silver meeting,

03:19:18 is that right?

03:19:19 Yes.

03:19:20 So this is your record

03:19:21 of that meeting

03:19:23 that you were taking,

03:19:25 is this right

03:19:26 contemporaneously

03:19:27 with the meeting?

03:19:28 Yeah, I tried to get down

03:19:30 and obviously the

03:19:31 silver command vehicle

03:19:32 is very cramped

03:19:34 and there were probably

03:19:35 a dozen or more people

03:19:36 in there so

03:19:37 I am trying to obviously

03:19:39 scribble as much as I can

03:19:41 down in that limited space.

03:19:44 Now, going over the page

03:19:47 to page five of that,

03:19:48 do your notes continue

03:19:50 of where you're recording

03:19:53 what was happening

03:19:54 at that meeting?

03:19:55 Yes.

03:19:56 Now picking it up

03:19:58 at the bottom

03:19:59 or towards the bottom

03:20:00 of page five

03:20:01 you can see

03:20:02 there is a pair

03:20:06 of asterisks action

03:20:08 and then second asterisk

03:20:10 electoral roll question mark.

03:20:12 Yeah.

03:20:17 Does that record

03:20:18 that you were asked

03:20:20 to obtain a copy

03:20:21 of the electoral roll?

03:20:23 Yes.

03:20:24 And you say in your statement

03:20:26 in paragraph 11.1

03:20:28 that you were also asked

03:20:29 for a floor plan

03:20:30 from the TMO.

03:20:32 Correct.

03:20:33 And is that because

03:20:34 we see that

03:20:35 is the prompt for that

03:20:36 that we see that recorded

03:20:37 in your contemporaneous note?

03:20:38 Yes.

03:20:39 Now there is a tick

03:20:40 next to that.

03:20:41 What does that signify?

03:20:45 Difficult to recall now.

03:20:46 I think it was

03:20:48 my indication

03:20:50 that I had actioned that

03:20:51 by actually requesting

03:20:53 that from the TMO.

03:20:55 Right.

03:20:56 Now going back

03:20:57 to your statement

03:20:58 if I can please

03:20:59 you say in paragraph 11.1

03:21:05 there Nicholas Leighton

03:21:08 had to leave the scene

03:21:09 at approximately 6.30

03:21:10 as he had to go

03:21:11 to the town hall

03:21:12 and unlock it

03:21:13 in readiness

03:21:14 for the staff arriving

03:21:15 that day.

03:21:16 Just pausing there

03:21:17 Nicholas Leighton

03:21:18 in his statement

03:21:19 says he left about 7am.

03:21:21 Who do you think is right?

03:21:27 I think I probably

03:21:28 lost sight of him

03:21:29 around about 6.30.

03:21:31 And obviously I don't know

03:21:33 how he got back to the town hall

03:21:35 whether he had to walk back there.

03:21:38 Now in that same paragraph

03:21:42 if one looks about

03:21:43 two thirds of the way down it

03:21:45 paragraph 11.1

03:21:46 you say it was at this meeting

03:21:48 that the LFB commander

03:21:49 indicated that there was likely

03:21:50 to be significant fatalities.

03:21:52 I was also asked to obtain

03:21:54 a copy of the electoral roll

03:21:55 for Grenfell Tower

03:21:56 from RBKC

03:21:56 as well as a floor plan

03:21:58 from the TMO.

03:21:59 This was the first time

03:22:01 you say these requests

03:22:02 had been made.

03:22:06 Do you mean there

03:22:07 that this was the first time

03:22:08 you had been asked

03:22:09 or do you mean

03:22:10 that this was the first time

03:22:11 RBKC had been asked?

03:22:13 Certainly it was the first time

03:22:15 I had been asked

03:22:16 and I don't recall

03:22:18 Nick Leighton

03:22:19 telling me

03:22:20 that he had been asked

03:22:21 before that time.

03:22:23 Right.

03:22:26 Now in terms of a floor plan

03:22:34 again do you think

03:22:37 that was the first time

03:22:38 that RBKC had been asked?

03:22:44 I wouldn't be able to say

03:22:45 that with any certainty

03:22:46 because obviously there are

03:22:48 other methods of communication

03:22:50 so somebody else from RBKC

03:22:53 could have been asked

03:22:54 by somebody from the TMO

03:22:55 via another channel.

03:22:57 But for me as Lalo

03:22:59 that was the first request

03:23:00 that had been made

03:23:01 to me in that role.

03:23:03 Okay.

03:23:04 Now I'm just going to play

03:23:05 to you if I can

03:23:06 some footage

03:23:07 which was taken

03:23:08 on Mr. Ollyspector Thatcher's

03:23:10 body worn video

03:23:11 of this part of that meeting.

03:23:14 It's INQ quintuple 0518

03:23:18 and it's an adjusted time

03:23:19 of 7.29am and 45 seconds

03:23:22 to 7.30am and 15 seconds

03:23:25 so it's just over a minute

03:23:27 if we can please have that

03:23:28 and what I'm going to be

03:23:29 looking at is what is being

03:23:30 said about plans if I can.

03:23:36 Can I just confirm as well

03:23:38 and we have been asking this

03:23:40 for a very long time

03:23:41 have they been given plans

03:23:44 before any plans

03:23:45 and what I've got

03:23:46 back through local authority

03:23:48 you know I think it's going

03:23:49 to be a bit of a struggle.

03:23:50 As far as I'm aware

03:23:51 the guy from the TMO

03:23:52 the MD from the TMO

03:23:53 has got plans on his

03:23:54 phone and he was looking

03:23:56 at what to bring them

03:23:57 through to something

03:23:58 so.

03:23:59 What it's worth I've got

03:24:00 a picture from the

03:24:01 BA control that they have

03:24:03 of a standard floor

03:24:05 but also we know

03:24:06 which numbers of labs are.

03:24:07 Sending it on a phone

03:24:08 is no good for me

03:24:09 so if that and I hate

03:24:11 to say this and please

03:24:12 don't recall this

03:24:13 in the minutes

03:24:14 but having experienced

03:24:15 the back end of the

03:24:16 Lackdown inquiry

03:24:17 having been in charge

03:24:18 of other major incidents

03:24:20 I'm telling you now

03:24:21 that the fact you have

03:24:22 not been able to get

03:24:23 me a set of plans

03:24:24 actually as a set of plans

03:24:26 is a major deficiency

03:24:28 and will be highlighted

03:24:29 so do your best

03:24:31 to get someone else

03:24:32 within the council

03:24:33 to get those set of plans

03:24:34 if it comes back to this unit

03:24:35 we'll get it to the right people

03:24:36 have you been asked about it?

03:24:37 I've gone and sent a guide

03:24:38 to get calls trying to check

03:24:39 on my subject's system

03:24:41 and see if I can get

03:24:42 something as.

03:24:45 Now.

03:24:48 First of all

03:24:49 you've heard him

03:24:50 say there that

03:24:51 first of all

03:24:52 you were the gentleman

03:24:53 to identify yourself

03:24:54 in that footage

03:24:55 you were there

03:24:56 you were the gentleman

03:24:57 just towards the rise

03:24:58 of the phrase

03:24:59 and do you recall

03:25:01 incident commander

03:25:03 Rose saying that

03:25:04 we have been asking

03:25:05 for plans for a very long time?

03:25:07 I do yeah

03:25:08 and obviously at that stage

03:25:10 I thought it inappropriate

03:25:12 to sort of query that

03:25:13 because it was very

03:25:15 apparent from his

03:25:16 statement that

03:25:18 that was a major

03:25:20 demand from the fire service

03:25:22 and I suppose

03:25:23 my reaction to that was

03:25:24 well I may not have heard

03:25:26 that request before

03:25:28 but I'll certainly do my best

03:25:29 to action it.

03:25:31 Now it sounds as if

03:25:33 you had already discussed

03:25:34 the matter of plans

03:25:35 with somebody at the TMO

03:25:37 is that right or?

03:25:39 Again I don't have

03:25:41 a recollection of that

03:25:42 I mean the recollection

03:25:44 I do have is I came away

03:25:45 from that 710 meeting

03:25:47 with a clear message

03:25:48 ringing in my ears

03:25:49 that the fire brigade

03:25:50 wanted those plans

03:25:51 and that's when

03:25:52 I spoke to Theresa Brown.

03:25:54 Right there's a reference

03:25:55 to plans being available

03:25:57 on a mobile phone

03:25:58 can you assist us with that?

03:25:59 Yeah I'm not quite sure

03:26:01 how I found out about that

03:26:02 but certainly Robert Black

03:26:05 had on his mobile phone

03:26:07 it would appear a plan

03:26:10 of at least one floor

03:26:11 of the tower.

03:26:13 Now how that had arrived

03:26:14 whether that had been

03:26:15 emailed to him or WhatsApp

03:26:17 or whatever I don't know

03:26:18 or whether it was just

03:26:19 something he had

03:26:20 on his phone

03:26:21 anyhow but once I

03:26:23 discovered that

03:26:24 it obviously made sense

03:26:26 to tell the fire service

03:26:28 that that was the case

03:26:30 and make arrangements

03:26:32 for Mr Black to speak

03:26:34 with them directly.

03:26:36 Now going back to your

03:26:37 statement please

03:26:38 at paragraph 11.3

03:26:40 on page 6

03:26:43 we'll just wait to get

03:26:44 that up on the screen

03:26:45 you say we can have

03:26:47 this highlighted

03:26:48 at approximately 0740 hours

03:26:50 I was made aware

03:26:51 that Robert Black

03:26:52 had a copy of the plan

03:26:53 on one floor

03:26:54 on his mobile phone

03:26:56 just pausing there

03:27:01 where do you get the 0740

03:27:03 or approximately 0740

03:27:05 from?

03:27:08 Yeah I mean that was

03:27:10 obviously my recollection

03:27:11 that was roughly the time

03:27:12 that I became aware of that.

03:27:14 Did you become aware

03:27:15 of that during the meeting

03:27:16 or before this meeting

03:27:17 that we've seen videoed?

03:27:19 Yes I mean I think

03:27:20 I did mention something

03:27:21 about a mobile phone

03:27:22 in that clip

03:27:23 yes

03:27:24 so maybe I was

03:27:26 you know maybe that was my

03:27:28 my recollection of the time

03:27:30 was wrong at that particular juncture.

03:27:33 I was going to put it to you

03:27:35 is it possible that your 0740

03:27:36 is wrong and that

03:27:37 in fact you had come

03:27:39 to learn that Robert Black

03:27:40 had a copy of the plan

03:27:42 on a floor on his phone

03:27:43 prior to the start

03:27:44 of this meeting?

03:27:46 Yep that is possible

03:27:48 although I've got

03:27:50 the recollection that

03:27:51 he didn't or you know

03:27:54 he didn't deliver

03:27:55 that mobile phone

03:27:57 to the fire brigade

03:27:58 until after that 710 meeting.

03:28:00 Do you know how

03:28:01 you were made aware

03:28:02 that Robert Black

03:28:03 had a copy of the plans

03:28:04 of one floor on his phone?

03:28:06 You know again

03:28:07 I think it must have

03:28:08 just been in conversation

03:28:10 when I was liaising

03:28:12 with the TMO team

03:28:15 and somehow I must have

03:28:17 obviously must have been aware

03:28:18 made aware of that.

03:28:20 So is it possible

03:28:21 that you had discussed

03:28:22 building plans with the TMO

03:28:25 prior to that silver TCM

03:28:28 which started at 0730?

03:28:30 Yeah that is possible yes.

03:28:35 Following this silver TCM

03:28:38 did you action the request

03:28:41 to get plans

03:28:42 which the incident commander

03:28:44 had underlined?

03:28:45 Yes I did.

03:28:47 Yes as far as I recall

03:28:49 I passed that request back

03:28:51 so I think later on

03:28:53 I wasn't sure at that stage

03:28:55 whether the

03:28:56 Borough Emergency Control Centre

03:28:57 the BEC had actually

03:28:58 been set up

03:28:59 and I think I have got a time

03:29:01 later on in my statement

03:29:02 when I became aware

03:29:04 that that had been set up.

03:29:06 So I was aware that the TMO

03:29:09 especially Theresa Brown

03:29:11 were on the scene

03:29:13 and it made far more sense

03:29:15 if you like to

03:29:17 speak with them

03:29:18 as it was far more likely

03:29:20 that they would have access

03:29:21 to plans of the tower

03:29:23 than maybe somebody might have

03:29:24 back at the town hall.

03:29:26 Now you say at paragraph 11.3

03:29:28 I recall him

03:29:30 speaking to the fire officer

03:29:31 at silver command

03:29:32 and I believe he forwarded

03:29:33 the plan to the requested

03:29:34 fire email address

03:29:35 although I never saw

03:29:36 a hard copy of the plans.

03:29:38 Do you remember

03:29:39 whether that discussion

03:29:41 you recall between him

03:29:44 and the fire officer

03:29:45 happened before

03:29:46 or after this meeting

03:29:47 the silver meeting?

03:29:49 I've still got the recollection

03:29:52 that that happened

03:29:53 after the silver meeting.

03:29:55 Did you know

03:29:56 that Robert Black

03:29:57 had sent plans

03:29:59 to the Dangerous Structure

03:30:01 Engineer at 6.15

03:30:03 or about 6.15?

03:30:06 No I didn't.

03:30:07 Right.

03:30:08 Did anybody from the TMO

03:30:10 including Mr Black

03:30:11 tell you that?

03:30:13 Not that I recall, no.

03:30:15 You say you recall him

03:30:25 speaking to the fire officer

03:30:26 and you believe

03:30:27 he forwarded the plan.

03:30:28 Do you know why

03:30:30 you were not used

03:30:31 as the conduit

03:30:32 between the TMO

03:30:33 and the London Fire Brigade

03:30:34 for the forwarding

03:30:35 of those plans

03:30:36 as the lay low?

03:30:38 No, I mean all I can recall

03:30:40 is the fact that

03:30:42 there was discussion

03:30:44 between Mr Black

03:30:46 and the fire control truck

03:30:48 after the 7.10 meeting.

03:30:50 Right.

03:30:52 Did you ever see

03:30:53 any plans of Grenfell Tower

03:30:55 on the night?

03:30:57 I believe at some stage

03:30:59 they did appear

03:31:00 in the silver command vehicle.

03:31:03 Do you remember when?

03:31:05 I don't.

03:31:07 Can I ask you

03:31:08 to look at something?

03:31:10 It's LFB quadruple zero

03:31:13 1968.

03:31:19 I'd like you to go

03:31:20 or be taken please

03:31:21 to page 49.

03:31:29 Do you recognise that

03:31:31 as a plan sent to the LFB

03:31:33 at any stage?

03:31:35 Only because I've seen that

03:31:36 on footage which has already

03:31:39 been shown to this inquiry.

03:31:41 But not from the night?

03:31:42 Not all the time.

03:31:43 Page 51 please.

03:31:50 Same question again.

03:31:52 Do you recognise that

03:31:53 as a plan sent to the LFB?

03:31:57 Yes, again same answer really.

03:32:00 I realise from the footage

03:32:03 that has been shown

03:32:04 at some stage

03:32:05 it was in the silver

03:32:07 command truck

03:32:08 and I must have been

03:32:09 in the silver command

03:32:10 truck after it had been

03:32:12 displayed within there

03:32:13 but I must in all honesty

03:32:15 I can't recall

03:32:16 seeing it displayed.

03:32:18 It wasn't brought

03:32:19 to my attention shall we say.

03:32:21 Let's have a look

03:32:22 and see what was displayed.

03:32:23 We have a photograph for you

03:32:24 which is MET triple zero

03:32:26 18729.

03:32:35 We can see that this is

03:32:36 well I should tell you

03:32:37 what this is.

03:32:38 This is a photograph

03:32:39 taken from within CU8

03:32:41 the command unit you were at

03:32:44 and there is a whiteboard

03:32:45 and to the right of the whiteboard

03:32:46 we can see pinned up

03:32:47 or clipped up to it

03:32:48 is a list of plans

03:32:51 or set of plans

03:32:52 showing four floors

03:32:53 of the tower.

03:32:54 Is that what you recall

03:32:55 seeing in the command unit?

03:32:57 As I say I can't in all honesty

03:32:59 recall seeing it.

03:33:00 I know it must have been there

03:33:02 but because all the meetings

03:33:05 I went to you were trying

03:33:06 to cram an awful lot of people

03:33:08 into a very small space.

03:33:11 Unless the fire commander

03:33:12 was actually pointing

03:33:13 to the whiteboard

03:33:14 then I probably wasn't aware

03:33:16 of it.

03:33:20 Did you know that by

03:33:23 and there is a reason

03:33:24 for me asking you this

03:33:25 but did you know that by 7.30

03:33:27 the dangerous structures

03:33:30 engineer John Allen

03:33:31 had returned to Kensington

03:33:32 Town Hall to look

03:33:33 for a copy of the plans?

03:33:35 I wasn't aware of that

03:33:36 at that stage.

03:33:37 Do you know from your experience

03:33:39 where these plans

03:33:40 might be kept

03:33:41 and how easy they were

03:33:42 to access?

03:33:43 No, obviously it would be

03:33:44 very unlikely

03:33:45 that there would be

03:33:46 a member of the housing staff

03:33:47 in the town hall

03:33:48 at that time

03:33:49 unless they had been

03:33:50 specifically called in

03:33:51 by the BEC or any other agency

03:33:54 or the surveyor.

03:33:56 So in my mind

03:33:58 it was always more likely

03:34:00 that copies of the plans

03:34:02 would be found

03:34:03 with the TNO

03:34:04 rather than with the council.

03:34:10 Do you remember

03:34:13 plans being brought back

03:34:15 to the incident ground?

03:34:17 I don't, not physically, no.

03:34:20 Were you aware

03:34:21 of something called

03:34:22 a premises information box

03:34:23 at Grenfell Tower?

03:34:24 I've only been aware

03:34:25 of that since the inquiries

03:34:26 have been in progress

03:34:27 but I wasn't aware of it before.

03:34:29 Was there one?

03:34:30 Not as far as I know.

03:34:32 I mean I'd only

03:34:33 personally I'd only

03:34:34 visited Grenfell Tower

03:34:35 once before

03:34:36 and that was to attend

03:34:37 a meeting in one of the

03:34:38 meeting rooms

03:34:39 on the ground floor

03:34:40 so that was my only

03:34:41 actual physical experience

03:34:43 of the tower before

03:34:44 the date of the fire.

03:34:45 Right. Did you know

03:34:46 prior to the silver meeting

03:34:47 at 7.13 that there was

03:34:49 no premises information box

03:34:50 at Grenfell Tower?

03:34:51 No, I can't recall

03:34:53 that being specifically

03:34:54 mentioned at that stage.

03:34:56 Did it occur to you

03:34:57 to say well there should be

03:34:58 a premises information box here

03:35:00 surely the plans are in it?

03:35:03 Looking back on it

03:35:04 in hindsight logically

03:35:06 it would be good

03:35:07 if there had been

03:35:08 premises immediately

03:35:09 or plans immediately

03:35:10 available but from my own

03:35:12 knowledge I didn't know

03:35:13 that that was the case

03:35:15 or I did not know either.

03:35:18 Now slightly different topic

03:35:21 short topic list of residents

03:35:24 and we've seen your log

03:35:27 referring to the request

03:35:28 for the electoral roll

03:35:35 and in your witness statement

03:35:36 of paragraph 11.2

03:35:40 you say, this is page 6

03:35:42 in the last sentence

03:35:45 I requested them

03:35:46 halfway through the last

03:35:47 sentence I requested them

03:35:48 to obtain and provide

03:35:50 a copy of the electoral roll

03:35:54 for Grenfell Tower

03:35:55 the them there is

03:35:56 I think is the BEC

03:35:57 is that right?

03:35:58 Correct, yes.

03:36:02 Was one supplied?

03:36:05 That I don't know.

03:36:08 Now we saw earlier

03:36:09 that you had made a note

03:36:11 at the 7.13 meeting

03:36:13 against

03:36:23 well let's have a look at it

03:36:24 perhaps rather than guessing

03:36:25 if you go to RBK0002838

03:36:28 and turn back to page 5

03:36:30 use this way to do this

03:36:32 you can see that in your note

03:36:34 of that meeting

03:36:38 it's on page

03:36:42 it's on page 5 at the bottom

03:36:45 you can see that

03:36:46 we looked at this before

03:36:47 there was a tick

03:36:48 next to floor plans

03:36:51 but you put a question mark

03:36:52 next to electoral roll

03:36:56 what does the absence

03:36:57 of the tick against

03:36:58 electoral roll tell us

03:36:59 if anything?

03:37:02 I mean I suppose

03:37:03 at that stage

03:37:04 I still don't know

03:37:05 whether the electoral roll

03:37:06 these days is an electronic

03:37:08 document rather than

03:37:09 a hard copy

03:37:11 I rather suspect it is

03:37:14 all I can say is

03:37:16 I was probably questioning

03:37:17 myself as to whether

03:37:19 that electoral roll

03:37:20 was accessible

03:37:23 but I put the request

03:37:25 into the BEC

03:37:26 and what happened

03:37:27 from then I don't know

03:37:30 Now looking at the roll-off

03:37:33 of the meeting

03:37:34 of the tactical coordination

03:37:36 group at 045

03:37:38 you'll find this

03:37:39 at MET000

03:37:41 sorry, Quadruple 05404

03:37:44 page 8

03:37:55 at 845 a quarter

03:37:57 of the way down the page

03:37:59 just have that highlighted

03:38:00 for you on the screen

03:38:01 TCM

03:38:03 you can see

03:38:04 that you're in attendance

03:38:05 there Rumble Lalo

03:38:08 and then you look

03:38:10 some way down the page

03:38:11 two thirds of the way

03:38:12 down the page

03:38:14 you can just scroll down

03:38:15 it says there

03:38:17 local authority

03:38:19 numbers trying to

03:38:20 rationalise rest centres

03:38:21 list asked for

03:38:23 at last silver

03:38:25 is being given

03:38:26 to FSG sector

03:38:29 do you remember

03:38:30 what that was about?

03:38:33 No, I mean I wouldn't

03:38:34 know what FSG sector

03:38:36 actually stood for

03:38:38 because that may well be

03:38:39 a fabricate term

03:38:43 what I obviously did do

03:38:44 at each of those meetings

03:38:45 was to try and get

03:38:47 as comprehensive a list

03:38:48 as I could

03:38:49 of the rest centres

03:38:50 that were operating

03:38:51 and that was a constantly

03:38:53 changing situation

03:38:55 because the community

03:38:57 were acted magnificently

03:38:59 on the night

03:39:00 and premises were

03:39:02 opening up to accommodate

03:39:03 people within

03:39:06 probably a sort of

03:39:07 half mile to actually

03:39:08 a mile radius

03:39:09 from the tower

03:39:10 so it was a little bit

03:39:11 difficult to try and keep

03:39:13 up to date

03:39:14 with where people

03:39:17 were actually being taken

03:39:18 to it was a constantly

03:39:19 changing situation

03:39:24 and one more question

03:39:31 the list that's referred

03:39:32 to here in this note

03:39:33 does that trigger

03:39:34 any recollection

03:39:35 about whether there was

03:39:36 a discussion

03:39:37 about the list of residents

03:39:38 that had been asked for

03:39:39 at last being supplied?

03:39:47 Yes, it could well be

03:39:48 I mean I know later on

03:39:49 in my statement

03:39:50 I do refer to

03:39:52 when I actually got hold

03:39:53 of that the list

03:39:56 from the TNO

03:39:58 Yes, now Mr Chairman

03:39:59 I've just noted the time

03:40:00 I've got about

03:40:01 five minutes of questions

03:40:02 left and no more than that

03:40:04 I'm in your hands

03:40:05 as to whether we break

03:40:06 to finish the witness

03:40:07 subject to any further

03:40:08 questions

03:40:09 Right, well I imagine

03:40:10 Mr Rumbol you'd like

03:40:11 to finish before

03:40:12 we break for lunch

03:40:13 That would be very nice

03:40:14 Even if we have to run

03:40:15 on a little bit

03:40:16 Indeed, yes

03:40:17 Let's see if you can do it

03:40:18 Thank you very much

03:40:19 You've said in your last answer

03:40:25 that you do refer

03:40:30 to when you got hold

03:40:31 of the list

03:40:32 in your statement

03:40:33 If I can ask you

03:40:34 just to look at that

03:40:35 I think it's paragraph 13.2

03:40:38 in your second statement

03:40:40 which you'll find

03:40:41 on page seven

03:40:43 you say there

03:40:44 if you could just have

03:40:45 that highlighted on the screen

03:40:47 paragraph 13.2

03:40:50 a little later

03:40:51 but before 11 o'clock hours

03:40:54 I was handed a list

03:40:55 of all the tenants

03:40:56 of Grenfell Tower

03:40:57 by Theresa Brown

03:40:58 I remember that

03:40:58 this was a computer

03:40:59 spreadsheet print out

03:41:00 on A3 sized paper

03:41:01 and it contained a list

03:41:02 of the residents names

03:41:04 It was given to me

03:41:05 at the silver truck

03:41:06 and I informed

03:41:07 silver control

03:41:08 that I had the list

03:41:12 Can I ask you

03:41:13 please to be shown

03:41:14 RBK00014629

03:41:28 Is that the document

03:41:32 you're referring to

03:41:33 the spreadsheet

03:41:34 that you're referring to

03:41:35 It is and the

03:41:36 post-it note was my notes

03:41:38 with my scribbled signature

03:41:40 on the bottom

03:41:41 confirming that

03:41:43 Ah, that's you

03:41:44 It is, yes

03:41:52 Now that

03:41:53 looking at it

03:41:54 simply shows

03:41:55 the number

03:41:56 of residents

03:41:57 the number of people

03:42:01 registered to each flat

03:42:03 doesn't it

03:42:04 It doesn't show you

03:42:05 the names

03:42:06 and any details

03:42:07 of the residents

03:42:09 Was that what

03:42:10 you were expecting

03:42:12 At that stage

03:42:13 I have got the recollection

03:42:14 that there was another

03:42:16 document probably

03:42:17 A4 in size

03:42:19 which I believe

03:42:20 did contain

03:42:22 some names

03:42:23 and I believe

03:42:24 both documents

03:42:25 were given to me

03:42:26 at the same time

03:42:29 Can I ask you

03:42:30 in the light of that answer then

03:42:32 to be shown

03:42:33 LFB

03:42:36 0002434

03:42:38 sorry 24371

03:42:51 That's LFB

03:42:52 00024371

03:42:55 Is that the document

03:43:08 you were referring to

03:43:09 in your last answer

03:43:10 the A4 document

03:43:11 I believe so

03:43:12 Do you remember when

03:43:13 you received that

03:43:15 To the best of my recollection

03:43:16 I got both documents

03:43:17 at the same time

03:43:19 There's another document

03:43:20 as well

03:43:21 I'm sorry to

03:43:22 bombard you with them

03:43:24 LFB 00024372

03:43:29 I'll just look at

03:43:30 the first page of that

03:43:39 Again

03:43:40 it's another list

03:43:41 with similar information on it

03:43:43 Do you recall seeing that

03:43:45 I believe so

03:43:46 but obviously

03:43:47 I only had

03:43:48 if you like physical

03:43:49 control of these documents

03:43:51 for a very short

03:43:52 number of minutes

03:43:53 because once the

03:43:54 silver control

03:43:55 were aware

03:43:56 that they were available

03:43:57 they wanted them

03:43:58 transferred to

03:43:59 the bronze vehicle

03:44:00 which I believe

03:44:01 was in Grenfell Road itself

03:44:02 Now you refer to

03:44:03 a bronze vehicle

03:44:04 just now

03:44:05 and indeed

03:44:06 in your witness statement

03:44:07 of paragraph 11.3

03:44:09 What was the bronze vehicle

03:44:11 you were referring to

03:44:12 Well it was another

03:44:13 London Fire Brigade

03:44:14 control vehicle

03:44:15 which was

03:44:17 I say I believe

03:44:18 it was located

03:44:19 in Grenfell Road

03:44:20 so it was far closer

03:44:21 to the bronze vehicle

03:44:22 so it was far closer

03:44:23 to the tower

03:44:24 than the one in

03:44:25 Bomer Road

03:44:26 Had that been there

03:44:27 throughout your involvement

03:44:28 Yes

03:44:29 it had been

03:44:30 Do you know whether

03:44:31 you heard anybody

03:44:32 describe that

03:44:33 as the FSG Command Unit

03:44:34 It could well have been

03:44:35 I mean I was sort of

03:44:36 trying to stick to

03:44:37 the gold silver

03:44:38 bronze designation

03:44:39 Right

03:44:40 So I sort of

03:44:41 knew it

03:44:42 as the bronze vehicle

03:44:43 Who told you

03:44:44 that it was the bronze vehicle

03:44:45 I suppose

03:44:47 the fire service

03:44:49 told me where it was

03:44:50 and then

03:44:51 I went and found it

03:44:53 Now you say also

03:44:54 your statement

03:44:55 second statement

03:44:56 of paragraph 11.3

03:45:04 I'm so sorry

03:45:05 paragraph 13.2

03:45:11 13.2 on page 7

03:45:14 You say there

03:45:16 that in the second

03:45:19 part of that paragraph

03:45:20 I was asked to take it

03:45:21 to the bronze vehicle

03:45:22 which I did

03:45:23 and I asked

03:45:24 Theresa

03:45:25 if she could email it

03:45:26 to the designated

03:45:27 LFB email address

03:45:29 Did you give her

03:45:30 that address

03:45:31 or did you just say

03:45:32 send it to

03:45:33 the designated

03:45:34 LFB address

03:45:35 No as far as I recall

03:45:36 I did give her

03:45:37 the actual address

03:45:38 and I think

03:45:39 that was the

03:45:40 address

03:45:41 that I was asking

03:45:42 to send to

03:45:43 the email address

03:45:44 and I think

03:45:45 the actual email address

03:45:46 may well have been

03:45:47 on my notes

03:45:48 at the time

03:45:49 my log

03:45:51 I can't recall

03:45:52 for certain

03:45:53 but

03:46:00 And to the best

03:46:01 of your knowledge

03:46:02 did Theresa Brown

03:46:03 send that information

03:46:05 to the email address

03:46:06 you gave

03:46:07 As far as I'm aware

03:46:08 she did

03:46:13 And roughly

03:46:14 what time was this

03:46:15 do you think

03:46:20 I would have said

03:46:21 it was all

03:46:24 within

03:46:27 so I'm just trying to think

03:46:31 so it was probably

03:46:32 just before

03:46:33 the 11 o'clock

03:46:34 silver command meeting

03:46:35 Right

03:46:43 So does that mean

03:46:44 that the LFB

03:46:45 had no tenant list

03:46:46 or even a list

03:46:47 of numbers

03:46:48 per flat

03:46:49 before 11

03:46:50 o'clock

03:46:51 or so

03:46:52 Not as far as I'm aware

03:46:53 Thank you

03:46:54 Mr Rumble

03:46:56 thank you very much

03:46:57 for your assistance

03:46:58 you'll be glad to know

03:46:59 that I've come to the end

03:47:00 of my questions

03:47:01 the normal routine

03:47:02 is that I then

03:47:03 pause

03:47:04 for a few minutes

03:47:05 just to check

03:47:06 whether I've got

03:47:07 any questions

03:47:08 and normally

03:47:09 the chairman rises

03:47:10 Mr Chairman

03:47:11 I mean your

03:47:12 hands as to what we do

03:47:13 I think that's the best course

03:47:14 Yes

03:47:15 I feel people are sometimes

03:47:16 rather inhibited

03:47:17 if the witness and I

03:47:18 are sitting here

03:47:19 overhearing your

03:47:20 conversations

03:47:21 So Mr Rumble

03:47:22 Mr Minnett needs

03:47:23 a couple of minutes

03:47:24 to check that

03:47:25 he's asked all the questions

03:47:26 Indeed

03:47:27 I'll rise for

03:47:28 just under five minutes

03:47:30 we'll get back in here

03:47:31 before 1.15

03:47:33 to mop up

03:47:34 anything that's left over

03:47:36 All right

03:47:37 Okay

03:47:38 So please don't talk

03:47:39 to anyone about your

03:47:40 evidence while you're

03:47:41 in the room

03:47:42 and the usher will now

03:47:43 take you to a quiet place

03:47:45 Thank you

03:47:46 All right

03:47:47 Thank you

03:48:01 Mr Minnett I'm getting

03:48:02 to say 1.15

03:48:03 or sooner if possible

03:48:04 We'll bring you back

03:48:06 Mr Chairman

03:48:07 as soon as we can

03:48:08 Thank you

03:48:12 Thank you

03:48:42 Thank you

03:49:12 Thank you

03:49:42 Thank you

03:50:12 Thank you

03:50:42 Thank you

03:51:12 Thank you

03:51:42 Thank you

03:52:12 Thank you

03:52:42 Thank you

03:53:12 Thank you

03:53:42 Thank you

03:54:12 Thank you

03:54:42 Thank you

03:55:12 Thank you

03:55:42 Thank you

03:56:12 Thank you

03:56:42 So we can have a shorter

03:56:45 motion

03:57:10 Yes Mr Minnett

03:57:11 Well after all that

03:57:13 Well I know

03:57:14 there's a queue

03:57:15 I'm afraid

03:57:16 and I've also satisfied

03:57:17 myself that my own notes

03:57:18 also have further questions

03:57:19 I want to call

03:57:20 One or two

03:57:21 Won't take very long

03:57:22 Mr Chairman

03:57:23 So if we could please

03:57:24 have the witness back

03:57:25 Yes very well

03:57:41 Well the

03:57:43 it's taken

03:57:44 rather longer than

03:57:45 I'd hoped

03:57:46 it's slightly ominous

03:57:47 but we'll see

03:57:48 anyway there are

03:57:49 a few more questions

03:57:50 Yes Mr Minnett

03:57:51 We won't take very long

03:57:52 First of all

03:57:53 Mr Rumble

03:57:54 can I ask you

03:57:55 to look at paragraph 13.3

03:57:57 of your statement

03:57:59 at the foot of page 7

03:58:03 You say that

03:58:04 during this meeting

03:58:06 as the

03:58:07 silver meeting

03:58:09 later in the morning

03:58:11 on the 14th of June

03:58:12 you were asked to obtain

03:58:13 an asbestos register

03:58:15 for the building

03:58:17 Who asked you

03:58:19 to obtain that

03:58:22 As far as I recall

03:58:23 it obviously came out

03:58:24 of that silver meeting

03:58:25 and I would anticipate

03:58:27 it would have been

03:58:28 somebody from

03:58:29 the London Fire Brigade

03:58:30 but I cannot call whom

03:58:33 Did you know

03:58:34 why you were being asked

03:58:35 Not specifically

03:58:36 but obviously

03:58:38 they were

03:58:39 trying to find

03:58:40 as many documents

03:58:41 to do with the premises

03:58:42 that would assist

03:58:43 their operation

03:58:44 as possible

03:58:45 so this may well

03:58:46 have been a logical

03:58:47 request

03:58:48 Do you know

03:58:49 even today

03:58:50 whether it was provided

03:58:51 I don't

03:58:52 Can I ask you then

03:58:54 to look at

03:58:55 the Lambeth pack

03:58:56 that you were using

03:58:57 which is Rbk000

03:58:59 29039

03:59:01 and I'm wondering

03:59:02 what the

03:59:03 Rbk000 29039

03:59:10 Now we looked

03:59:11 intently at your own notes

03:59:13 within the document

03:59:14 but if you go

03:59:15 to the formal

03:59:16 or formatted

03:59:17 parts of the document

03:59:18 page 6

03:59:22 you can see

03:59:23 we looked at page 5

03:59:24 where there was methane

03:59:25 I should have

03:59:26 taken you to page 6

03:59:27 immediate problems

03:59:28 to consider

03:59:29 at the top of the page

03:59:31 Second item down

03:59:32 immediate problems

03:59:33 to consider

03:59:34 dangerous structures

03:59:35 officers

03:59:36 to assess

03:59:37 dangerous buildings

03:59:38 stroke civil engineering

03:59:39 structures

03:59:44 First question

03:59:45 would your

03:59:49 use of this document

03:59:50 or your training

03:59:51 or your experience

03:59:52 have caused you

03:59:53 immediately to consider

03:59:55 the need for

03:59:56 a dangerous structure

03:59:57 officer

04:00:00 I believe it would

04:00:01 have done

04:00:02 yes

04:00:03 as I say

04:00:04 I cannot recall

04:00:05 I know obviously

04:00:06 at some stage

04:00:07 I met John Allen

04:00:08 the district surveyor

04:00:10 who was performing

04:00:11 that function

04:00:13 I was also

04:00:14 relying on

04:00:16 what was happening

04:00:17 back at the town hall

04:00:18 when the BEC

04:00:19 had been set up

04:00:20 so they too

04:00:21 would have had

04:00:22 a checklist

04:00:23 if you like

04:00:24 to go through

04:00:25 which that

04:00:26 no doubt would also

04:00:27 have been on

04:00:28 but at the minute

04:00:29 I just cannot recall

04:00:30 whether I

04:00:31 specifically

04:00:32 asked for one

04:00:33 at that stage

04:00:34 At the time of your

04:00:35 arrival

04:00:36 did you think

04:00:37 or realise

04:00:38 that a dangerous

04:00:39 structures officer

04:00:40 or dangerous structures engineer

04:00:41 would need to see

04:00:42 the building straight away

04:00:43 to assess

04:00:44 whether or not

04:00:45 it was in danger of collapse

04:00:47 It was obviously apparent

04:00:48 that

04:00:49 the building

04:00:50 was very much

04:00:51 on fire

04:00:54 I don't have

04:00:55 any sort of

04:00:56 knowledge of

04:00:57 engineering structures

04:00:59 I was aware

04:01:00 however though

04:01:01 it was

04:01:02 mainly

04:01:03 a concrete

04:01:04 building

04:01:05 It's not as if

04:01:06 it was like

04:01:07 a wood building

04:01:08 but nevertheless

04:01:09 because the fire

04:01:10 was behaving

04:01:11 very unpredictably

04:01:14 there was obviously

04:01:15 that danger

04:01:16 and obviously

04:01:17 debris was falling

04:01:18 At the time

04:01:19 the debris appeared

04:01:20 to be

04:01:21 I hesitate to say

04:01:22 light debris

04:01:23 but it wasn't

04:01:24 sort of heavy pieces

04:01:25 of concrete

04:01:26 or metal

04:01:27 or wood

04:01:28 It was

04:01:29 burnt objects

04:01:30 if you like

04:01:31 so

04:01:32 obviously the

04:01:33 clouding

04:01:34 will come very much

04:01:35 into this

04:01:36 but

04:01:37 there was no

04:01:38 as far as I'm aware

04:01:39 there wasn't

04:01:40 it wasn't apparent

04:01:41 that there were

04:01:42 large lumps of concrete

04:01:43 or anything falling

04:01:44 off the building

04:01:45 at that stage

04:01:46 So it didn't occur to you

04:01:47 in the light

04:01:48 of this thing

04:01:49 on your checklist

04:01:50 that you needed

04:01:51 to get a dangerous

04:01:52 structures engineer

04:01:53 there straight away

04:01:54 Yes

04:01:55 obviously that went

04:01:56 on the checklist

04:01:57 but as I say

04:01:58 I cannot recall

04:01:59 which

04:02:00 that engineer

04:02:01 was called

04:02:02 or by whom

04:02:03 Right

04:02:04 Following the two

04:02:05 silver meetings

04:02:06 you were present at

04:02:07 did you do anything

04:02:09 to follow up

04:02:10 what remained outstanding

04:02:12 that you had asked for

04:02:13 at those meetings

04:02:17 I think I went through

04:02:18 my log

04:02:19 and

04:02:20 if there was anything

04:02:21 that was deficient

04:02:22 in that

04:02:23 I either made a second

04:02:24 request to the BEC

04:02:25 or tried to follow it up

04:02:26 in some other way

04:02:27 Right

04:02:28 How satisfied were you

04:02:29 having done that

04:02:30 that people understood

04:02:31 what it was

04:02:32 that you wanted

04:02:35 I mean the one request

04:02:36 that I have put

04:02:37 in my statement

04:02:38 that I'm not sure

04:02:39 was when the fire brigade

04:02:40 requested a minivan

04:02:41 and I think that was

04:02:42 for the purpose

04:02:43 of transporting

04:02:44 firefighters away

04:02:45 from the scene

04:02:46 for refreshments

04:02:47 and back again

04:02:48 Now as far as I'm aware

04:02:50 that request

04:02:51 was never actionable

04:02:52 so that was something

04:02:54 that happened

04:02:58 should have been followed up

04:02:59 but I don't know

04:03:01 whether it was

04:03:02 The other fact

04:03:04 I suppose

04:03:05 I need to highlight

04:03:06 is that

04:03:07 at the stage

04:03:08 I was talking to the BEC

04:03:09 I was also not aware

04:03:11 of how many people

04:03:12 might have been

04:03:13 in that BEC

04:03:14 how many people

04:03:15 were actually

04:03:16 at the town hall

04:03:19 able to respond

04:03:20 to these requests

04:03:21 Right

04:03:23 Final question

04:03:25 Did you know

04:03:26 in your rollers

04:03:27 lay low

04:03:28 or indeed otherwise

04:03:30 whether the TMO

04:03:31 had a contingency plan

04:03:32 for a full or partial

04:03:33 evacuation of this building

04:03:36 I was never made aware

04:03:37 of that

04:03:41 Mr Rumble thank you very much

04:03:42 those are my

04:03:43 further questions I have for you

04:03:44 I have no other questions

04:03:46 it just remains

04:03:47 for me to thank you

04:03:48 very much for coming today

04:03:49 and giving your evidence

04:03:50 to the enquiry

04:03:51 and assisting us

04:03:52 with our investigations

04:03:53 we're extremely grateful

04:03:54 Thank you

04:03:55 Thank you sir

04:03:56 I just would like to add sir

04:03:58 is I would like to add

04:04:00 my sympathy

04:04:01 and ongoing

04:04:02 thoughts to the survivors

04:04:03 and relatives

04:04:04 of those that have died

04:04:05 and

04:04:10 it obviously will remain

04:04:11 in my memory

04:04:12 for a long time to come

04:04:13 I'm sure it will

04:04:14 Thanks sir

04:04:15 and we are very grateful

04:04:16 to you for coming

04:04:17 to give your evidence

04:04:19 it's all part of

04:04:20 a big jigsaw puzzle

04:04:21 which we want to build up

04:04:23 so to hear how it was

04:04:25 and to see how it's going

04:04:26 on in your

04:04:28 particular responsibility

04:04:29 and what was done

04:04:30 is always very helpful

04:04:31 as being part of

04:04:32 that overall picture

04:04:34 Thank you very much

04:04:35 I'm sorry we've kept you

04:04:36 for a rather late lunch

04:04:37 No problem

04:04:38 At least you've now finished

04:04:39 and you can leave

04:04:40 Thank you

04:04:41 The Arshad

04:04:42 if you'd like to get the Arshad

04:04:43 she'll look after you

04:04:44 Thank you

04:04:55 Good morning

04:04:56 Well it has been

04:04:57 rather a long morning

04:04:58 but I think it was

04:04:59 a good thing

04:05:00 to enable that witness

04:05:01 to finish his evidence

04:05:02 We'll break now

04:05:03 and resume the half-past two

04:05:04 please

↩ All hearings